№ files_lp_3_process_7_070742
File format: docx
Character count: 62758
File size: 112 KB
This document presents a comparative analysis of mainstream and heterodox perceptions of capitalism and crises, focusing on their ethical implications and proposing alternative economic structures based on socio-environmental considerations.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Manchester, Liverpool, Cambridge
Theme:
Economics, Capitalism, Crises
Document Type:
Research Paper
Institution:
Manchester Metropolitan University, University of Liverpool, Anglia Ruskin University
Authors:
Sophia Kuehnlenz, Valeria Andreoni, Imko Meyenburg
Target Audience:
Academics, Researchers, Policymakers
Date Approved:
2021
Date of Last Revision:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2008-2011
Region / city:
N/A
Theme:
Heterodox economics, pluralist economic theory, critical analysis of mainstream economics
Document type:
Academic book series
Organization / institution:
Routledge
Author(s):
Wolfram Elsner, Peter Kriesler, Edward Fullbrook, John T. Harvey, Frederic Lee, Jon Bekken, Jonathan P. Goldstein, Michael G. Hillard, John Pullen, Enrico A. Marcelli, Colin C. Williams, Pascale Jossart, Sebastian Berger, Jack Reardon, Davide Gualerzi, William M. Dugger, William Waller, David Hamilton, Glen Atkinson, Emily Chamlee-Wright, Robin Hahnel, Kristen Sheeran, Virgil Storr
Target audience:
Academics, scholars, students of economics
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
1940s
Region / City:
New Orleans
Topic:
Theatre, Southern Gothic, Symbolism, Social Change, American Dream
Document type:
Analytical Essay
Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Theatre students, Scholars of American Literature
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Note:
Contextual description
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Princeton
Theme:
Democratic Capitalism
Document Type:
Research Seminar Syllabus
Institution:
Princeton University
Author:
Carles Boix
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Action:
Fall 2018
Approval Date:
September 2018
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Subject:
Economics, Capitalism, Market Transactions, Surplus
Document Type:
Educational Assessment / Quiz
Institution:
Economic Studies Department
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Students of economics, business, and finance
Period Covered:
Contemporary market scenarios
Topics:
Capitalism, Wealth, Consumer and Producer Surplus, Tax Impact, Market Efficiency
Format:
Multiple-choice questions with answers
Number of Questions:
21
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Economics, Capitalism, Fiat Currency
Document Type:
Essay
Author:
Unspecified
Target Audience:
General public, economists, and social theorists
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Unspecified
Date of Revisions:
Unspecified
Context:
A critical examination of the profit motive within capitalist economies, particularly through the lens of fiat currency systems and the potential for economic illusion.
Year:
2015
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Business Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility
Document Type:
Educational Lesson Plan
Institution:
Conscious Capitalism Institute / Educational Program
Author:
John Mackey (cited), Module 8 Curriculum Team
Target Audience:
Business students, management trainees
Period Covered:
2015–present
Key Concepts:
Conscious Capitalism, CSR, Stakeholder Theory, Corporate Culture, Leadership
Case Study:
REI #OptOutside initiative
Supplementary Materials:
Videos, articles, audio-visual resources
Year:
2021
Region / City:
United Kingdom, Essex
Topic:
Racism, International Relations, Political Economy
Document Type:
Essay
Organization / Institution:
University of Essex
Author:
Pierluigi De Rogatis
Target Audience:
Academics, Scholars, Researchers
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2024/25
Region / City:
Bradford
Subject:
Mainstream Primary and Secondary School Funding
Document Type:
Consultation Paper
Organization:
Bradford Authority
Author:
Andrew Redding
Target Audience:
Schools and Academies in Bradford
Period of Action:
2024/25 Financial Year
Approval Date:
Not provided
Amendment Date:
6 October 2023
Year:
2022
Note:
Region / city
Theme:
Education, Public Finance Initiatives
Document type:
Guidance document
Agency / institution:
Department for Education (DfE)
Target audience:
Local authorities, academies
Date of amendments:
June 2022
Year:
2023
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Theme:
Education, School Design
Document type:
Brief
Institution:
[Insert full name of school, URN code and project code]
Author:
[Author name or responsible body]
Target audience:
Technical professionals in school design and construction
Period of validity:
[Not specified]
Approval date:
[Not specified]
Date of amendments:
December 2023
Year:
2023
Month:
February
Country:
England
Education sector:
Primary and secondary education
School type:
Mainstream academies and free schools
Document type:
Non-statutory guidance
Issuing body:
Department for Education
Intended audience:
Mainstream free schools in pre-opening
Regulatory framework:
School Admissions Code
Subject matter:
School admission arrangements
Includes:
Admission number, oversubscription criteria, sixth-form admissions, application process
Review status:
Kept under review
Year:
2022
Region / City:
UK
Theme:
PFI agreements, Education
Document Type:
Guidance
Organization:
Department for Education (DfE)
Author:
Department for Education (DfE)
Target Audience:
Local authorities, academies
Period of Validity:
Ongoing updates
Approval Date:
June 2022
Date of Last Revision:
June 2022
Region:
Croydon
Country:
United Kingdom
Subject:
Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND)
Document Type:
Informational Guide
Initiative:
Croydon Locality SEND Support (CLSS)
Target Group:
Parents and Carers
Beneficiaries:
Children and Young People with SEND (Nursery to Year 11)
Implementing Bodies:
Local Schools and Local Authority
Key Roles:
Area SEND Leads, SENDCos, Educational Psychologists
Funding Sources:
Locality Funding, Early Years SEND Funding (SENIF)
Scope:
Mainstream Schools
Exclusions:
Children with EHCP, Special Schools, Enhanced Learning Provisions
Year:
2021
Date of publication:
June 2021
Jurisdiction:
England
Legislation:
Companies Act 2006
Document type:
Model articles of association
Issuing body:
Department for Education
Legal form:
Company limited by guarantee
Subject:
Governance and constitutional framework of academy trusts
Applies to:
Mainstream academies, special academies, 16–19 academies, alternative provision academies, free schools, studio schools
Status:
Model document for adoption and adaptation by academy trusts
Regulatory context:
Funding agreements with the Secretary of State; charity and company law
Scope:
Membership, trusteeship, meetings, financial reporting, governance procedures, disqualification and indemnity provisions
Year:
2019–2021
Region:
Northern Ireland
Subject:
Specialist educational provision and equality screening
Document Type:
Equality and Human Rights Screening Template
Policy Title:
A Framework for Specialist Provision in Mainstream Schools
Responsible Authority:
Education Authority (EA)
Related Strategy:
Providing Pathways – Strategic Area Plan for School Provision 2017–2021
Legislative Context:
Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Act (NI) 2016; The Children’s Services Co-operation Act (NI) 2015
Stakeholders:
Children and young people with special educational needs; families; school staff; Boards of Governors; Education Authority staff; Department of Education; Health and Social Care Trusts; voluntary organisations
Geographical Scope:
Regional
Evidence Base:
Schools Census Data 2015/16–2019/20; EA enrolment and HR data; Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency data; academic research; stakeholder engagement
Target Group:
Pupils with a statement of special educational needs in mainstream schools
Policy Context:
Area Planning strategy and continuum of support for special educational needs
Impact Consideration:
Accessibility of specialist provision and regional consistency
Year:
2019–2020
Region / city:
Australia
Theme:
Disability Services, Health Care
Document Type:
Grant Opportunity Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA), Community Grants Hub
Author:
National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA)
Target Audience:
Organizations and individuals applying for disability-related grants
Period of validity:
2019–2020
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Ethiopia, Addis Ababa
Subject:
Islam, Muslim communities, political securitization
Document Type:
Academic article
Institution / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Mükerrem Miftah
Target Audience:
Scholars, policymakers, students of Ethiopian studies and religious studies
Period Covered:
Post-1990s Ethiopia
Data Sources:
Fieldwork, interviews with religious leaders, observation, documents, research articles
Keywords:
Islam, Muslims, Suffiyah, Wahhabism, al-Ahbash, EPRDF, Ethiopia
Country:
United Kingdom
Region / City:
Bradford
Topic:
Special educational needs and disabilities in mainstream education
Document type:
Guidance document
Sector:
Education
Institutional context:
Local area education system and mainstream schools
Target group:
Children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND)
Audience:
Schools, school leaders, SENCOs, teachers, governing bodies and support staff
Key roles mentioned:
Governing body, Headteacher, Senior Leadership Team (SLT), Special Educational Needs Coordinator (SENCO), teachers, teaching assistants
Legal framework referenced:
Children and Families Act (2014); SEND Code of Practice (2015); Equality Act (2010); Education Act (1996); Teachers’ Standards (2012)
Structure of guidance:
Ordinarily Available Provision; SEN Matrix; Local Inclusion Support Offer
Educational approach:
Inclusive culture and whole-school approach
Evidence source referenced:
Education Endowment Foundation recommendations
Core focus:
Expectations for inclusive practice and support for pupils with SEND in mainstream schools