№ lp_1_2_60483
File format: docx
Character count: 42828
File size: 5329 KB
The document is a detailed report analyzing the results of internal surveys at LSE for first and second-year students, focusing on how various student characteristics correlate with satisfaction levels in relation to their educational experiences.
Year:
2020
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Student surveys, educational performance
Document type:
Report
Institution:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Authors:
Hasan Younis, Yunxiao Chen, Ellen Austin
Target audience:
Academic and research institutions, educational policymakers
Period of validity:
2018-2019
Approval date:
05/10/2020
Date of changes:
None
Note:
Context
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Gauteng
Theme:
Education
Document Type:
Application Form
Institution:
Gauteng Department of Education (GDE)
Target Audience:
Applicants for advertised educator promotion and education therapist posts
Note:
Year
Region / City:
London
Subject:
Supplier onboarding
Document type:
Guideline
Institution:
London School of Economics & Political Science
Target audience:
LSE suppliers
Year:
2023
Region / city:
London
Topic:
PhD examination fees and expenses
Document type:
Form
Organization / institution:
LSE PhD Academy
Author:
LSE PhD Academy
Target audience:
Examiners of PhD candidates
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
January 2023
Amendment date:
January 2023
Description:
This is a form detailing the fees and reimbursable expenses for examiners participating in PhD examinations at the London School of Economics.
Year:
2018
Institution:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Department:
Department of Gender Studies
Type of document:
Guide / Academic Policy
Audience:
Students
Topic:
Plagiarism, Academic Integrity, Citation
Scope:
Undergraduate and Graduate Coursework
Document status:
Updated August 2018
Format:
Digital and Print
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Employment opportunities, job advertisement
Document type:
Job posting
Organization / Institution:
LSE (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Potential job applicants
Duration:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
London
Subject:
Graduate Admissions, Reference Request
Document Type:
Reference Form
Organization / Institution:
London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)
Author:
LSE Graduate Admissions Team
Target Audience:
Referees for applicants to LSE postgraduate programs
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Region / City:
London
Topic:
Employment, Academic Positions
Document Type:
Job Advertisement
Institution:
London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)
Target Audience:
Internal applicants at LSE
Context:
Job advertisement for various research and policy positions at LSE, including details about salary, duties, and application process.
Date:
2 May 2019
Institution:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Organising body:
LSE Teaching and Learning Centre
Partner organisation:
LSE Students’ Union
Event type:
Education symposium
Venues:
The Lincoln Centre, 18 Lincoln’s Inn Fields; 32 Lincoln’s Inn Fields; Parish Hall; Saw Swee Hock Building Basement
Themes:
Inclusivity; Research-informed teaching; Student experience; Teaching innovation
Keynote speaker:
Professor Dilly Fung, Pro-Director Education
Participants:
LSE staff speakers; Change Makers student researchers; LSESU representatives
Sessions:
Morning staff sessions; Change Makers presentations; Marketplace of ideas; Keynote address; Teaching Excellence Awards ceremony
Audience:
LSE staff and students
Year:
2026
Institution:
London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)
Department:
Social Media Team
Type of document:
Guidance / Informational text
Audience:
Researchers, academics, LSE staff and students
Topics:
Research communication, social media strategy, content promotion
Channels:
Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter
Content:
Campaign planning, content optimisation, audience engagement, video content, blog promotion
Collaboration:
Media Relations, Film and Audio, Public Affairs, Events, Digital Communications
Purpose:
Promoting research visibility and engagement through social media platforms
Access:
Internal and external LSE audiences
Related resources:
LSE Blogs, LSE Impact, LSE Review of Books, LSE Business Review
Year:
2020
Region / City:
California
Topic:
Integrated Resource Planning, Energy Forecasting, GHG Emissions, Energy System Reliability
Document Type:
Report
Author:
California Energy Commission
Target Audience:
Local Energy Suppliers (LSEs), Policy Makers, Energy Planners
Period of Validity:
Until 2030
Approval Date:
[DATE]
Date of Amendments:
[DATE]
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Freedom of Expression, Social Media, Digital Policy
Document Type:
Article
Organization / Institution:
LSE (London School of Economics)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
General public, policy makers, tech professionals
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Integrated Resource Planning
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
[NAME OF FILING ENTITY]
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Local System Entities (LSEs), Regulatory Bodies
Effective Period:
2025-2045
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Canberra
Topic:
Vital signs monitoring, early warning scores
Document type:
Procedure
Institution:
North Canberra Hospital
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Clinical staff at North Canberra Hospital
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Canberra
Theme:
Healthcare, Clinical Guidelines
Document Type:
Procedure
Organization:
Canberra Health Services
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Clinicians, Medical Officers, Nurses, Allied Health Professionals
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Autism Screening
Document Type:
Overview / Summary
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Adults, researchers, clinicians
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of modifications:
N/A
Note:
Year
Contextual description:
This document is a framework for assessment in clinical training for healthcare professionals.
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Tender evaluation and scoring methodology
Document Type:
Tender Evaluation Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Tender Evaluation Team, Contractors
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Document Type:
Grading rubric
Subject:
Essay writing
Evaluation Categories:
Introduction; Body Paragraphs; Conclusion; Vocabulary/Word Choice; Writing Mechanics & MLA Formatting
Scoring Scale:
1–5 (60%–100%)
Formatting Style:
MLA
Length Requirements:
More than 3 pages = 5 point deduction; Less than 2 pages = 5 point deduction
Required Components:
Works Cited Page; Check-off List/Rubric
Penalties:
Missing Works Cited Page = 5 point deduction; Missing paragraphs = 10 point deduction per paragraph; Missing Check-off List/Rubric = 2 point deduction
Additional Notes:
Essays may receive lower than 60% at the discretion of the teacher; Essay must accurately address the prompt
Author:
Not specified
Institution:
Not specified