№ lp_2_1_32619
File format: docx
Character count: 3349
File size: 169 KB
Educational assessment rubric outlining performance criteria, scoring levels, formatting requirements, and point deductions for academic essays evaluated in MLA style.
Document Type:
Grading rubric
Subject:
Essay writing
Evaluation Categories:
Introduction; Body Paragraphs; Conclusion; Vocabulary/Word Choice; Writing Mechanics & MLA Formatting
Scoring Scale:
1–5 (60%–100%)
Formatting Style:
MLA
Length Requirements:
More than 3 pages = 5 point deduction; Less than 2 pages = 5 point deduction
Required Components:
Works Cited Page; Check-off List/Rubric
Penalties:
Missing Works Cited Page = 5 point deduction; Missing paragraphs = 10 point deduction per paragraph; Missing Check-off List/Rubric = 2 point deduction
Additional Notes:
Essays may receive lower than 60% at the discretion of the teacher; Essay must accurately address the prompt
Author:
Not specified
Institution:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Canberra
Topic:
Vital signs monitoring, early warning scores
Document type:
Procedure
Institution:
North Canberra Hospital
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Clinical staff at North Canberra Hospital
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Canberra
Theme:
Healthcare, Clinical Guidelines
Document Type:
Procedure
Organization:
Canberra Health Services
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Clinicians, Medical Officers, Nurses, Allied Health Professionals
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Autism Screening
Document Type:
Overview / Summary
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Adults, researchers, clinicians
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of modifications:
N/A
Note:
Year
Contextual description:
This document is a framework for assessment in clinical training for healthcare professionals.
Year:
2020
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Student surveys, educational performance
Document type:
Report
Institution:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Authors:
Hasan Younis, Yunxiao Chen, Ellen Austin
Target audience:
Academic and research institutions, educational policymakers
Period of validity:
2018-2019
Approval date:
05/10/2020
Date of changes:
None
Note:
Context
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Tender evaluation and scoring methodology
Document Type:
Tender Evaluation Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Tender Evaluation Team, Contractors
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
AGREE II guideline assessment
Document Type:
Supplement
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Researchers, healthcare professionals
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Date of Update:
3/19/2025
Region:
Massachusetts
Subject:
World Language Proficiency Assessment
Document Type:
Official Assessment Policy and Approved Assessment List
Issuing Authority:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Program:
State Seal of Biliteracy
Target Audience:
School Districts and High School Students
Education Level:
High School
Assessment Categories:
Complete-Domain Assessments; Partial-Domain Assessments; Alternative Assessments; Additional Assessments
Criteria:
Minimum Scores and Proficiency Levels for Seal of Biliteracy and Seal with Distinction
Languages Covered:
Multiple World Languages including Arabic, Chinese, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Latin, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, American Sign Language, and others
Year:
Not specified
Region / city:
Not specified
Subject:
Clinical assessment of suicidal ideation, depression severity, and diagnostic performance
Document type:
Supplementary table
Organization / institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Researchers, clinicians in psychiatry and mental health
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Supplementary Table 2. Diagnostic performance metrics of different models in distinguishing patients with major depressive disorder from healthy control groups.
Year:
2019
Region / city:
Canada
Topic:
Immigrant assimilation, occupational income scores
Document type:
Research paper
Organization / institution:
University of Guelph, London School of Economics, St. Francis Xavier University
Author:
Kris Inwood, Chris Minns, Fraser Summerfield
Target audience:
Academics, researchers in economics and sociology
Period:
1911-1931
Approval date:
January 2019
Modification date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Australia
Field:
Ophthalmology, Genetics
Document type:
Research Article
Institution:
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, University of Queensland, The University of Western Australia, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Queensland University of Technology, University of Tasmania, University of Melbourne
Author:
Weixiong He, Samantha Sze-Yee Lee, Santiago Diaz Torres, Xikun Han, Puya Gharahkhani, Michael Hunter, Chandrakumar Balartnasingam, Jamie Craig, Alex W Hewitt, David A Mackey, Stuart MacGregor
Target Audience:
Researchers, Healthcare professionals
Period:
2023
Date approved:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
8-year follow-up
Region / City:
Multicenter international study
Subject:
Chronic hepatitis B treatment outcomes
Document type:
Supplementary table
Institution:
Clinical research consortium
Author:
Study investigators
Population:
Adult patients with chronic hepatitis B
Interventions:
TAF-TAF vs TDF-TAF
Endpoints:
Fibrosis progression measured by FibroTest
Analysis set:
Full analysis set (FAS)
Metrics:
Mean changes, standard deviation, fibrosis stage shifts
Notes:
Some baseline FibroTest scores missing (3 in TDF-TAF, 4 in TAF-TAF)
Year:
Not specified
Study population:
Patients after cessation of 5-year endocrine therapy
Therapy groups:
Tamoxifen (TMX); Aromatase inhibitor (AI)
Assessment time points:
Baseline; 6 months; 1 year after cessation
Instruments:
QLQ-C30; QLQ-BR45; QLQ-ELD14
Age subgroup:
QLQ-ELD14 assessed only in patients >65 years
Statistical test:
Mann Whitney U test
Outcome measures:
Mean scores and P-values
Score interpretation (functional scales):
0–100 scale, higher score indicates higher functional level
Score interpretation (symptom scales):
0–100 scale, higher score indicates greater degree of symptoms
Domains assessed (QLQ-C30):
Physical; Role; Emotional; Cognitive; Social; Global quality of life; Fatigue; Nausea and vomiting; Pain; Dyspnea; Sleep disturbance; Appetite loss; Constipation; Diarrhea; Financial impact; Summary score
Domains assessed (QLQ-BR45):
Body image; Future perspective; Sexual functioning; Sexual enjoyment; Breast satisfaction; Systemic therapy side effects; Upset by hair loss; Arm symptoms; Breast symptoms; Endocrine therapy symptoms; Skin mucosis symptoms; Endocrine sexual symptoms; Hot flushes; Joint symptoms
Domains assessed (QLQ-ELD14):
Mobility; Worries about others; Future worries; Maintaining purpose; Burden of illness; Joint stiffness; Family support
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Long Island
Topic:
Sports, Athletics
Document Type:
Instructions
Organization / Institution:
Newsday
Author:
Newsday
Target Audience:
Athletic directors, coaches, and assistants
Effective Period:
2026 season
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Type of document:
Evaluation rubric
Framework:
High-Leverage Practices
Primary focus:
HLP 7
Embedded practices:
HLP 8, HLP 9, HLP 13, HLP 14, HLP 15, HLP 17, HLP 18, HLP 19, HLP 21
Educational context:
Inclusive and special education
Performance levels:
Ineffective, Approaching Effective, Effective, Highly Effective
Key dimensions:
Expectations, Organization, Teacher Tone, Structure, Student Characteristics, Teacher Feedback
Target population:
Students with disabilities
Referenced organizations:
Council for Exceptional Children; CEEDAR Center; GMU TTAC Region 4
Referenced years:
2019–2024
Geographic reference:
United States
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Tennessee
Subject:
Education, Emergency Remote Learning
Document Type:
Template, Guidance
Organization:
Tennessee Department of Education
Author:
Tennessee Department of Education
Target Audience:
Local Education Agencies, Public Charter Schools
Effective Period:
2020-2021 school year
Approval Date:
June 26, 2020
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Arlington, VA
Topic:
Education, High-Leverage Practices, Special Education
Document Type:
Self-Assessment Tool
Organization / Institution:
Council for Exceptional Children, CEEDAR Center
Author:
T. C. Aceves, M. J. Kennedy
Target Audience:
Educators, Educational Professionals
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
February 2024
Date of Changes:
None
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Arlington, VA
Theme:
High-leverage practices for students with disabilities
Document type:
Self-assessment tool
Organization / Institution:
Council for Exceptional Children, CEEDAR Center
Author:
T. C. Aceves, M. J. Kennedy, A. I. Hashey, T. L. Kaczorowski, D. M. DiCesare, J. McLeskey
Target audience:
Educators, specialists in special education
Period of validity:
2024
Approval date:
February 2024
Modification date:
February 2024
Year:
2026
Institution:
Villanova University Office for Residence Life
Document Type:
Evaluation Rubric
Target Audience:
Resident Assistants and Staff Supervisors
Components:
Administrative Responsibilities, Community Development, Communication, Paperwork, Timeliness, CB Planning and Execution, CB Proposals and Reports
Date of Issue:
2026