№ files_lp_4_process_3_060684
File format: docx
Character count: 11865
File size: 17 KB
An academic lesson plan detailing a semester-long course activity where graduate students collaboratively review digital humanities projects for publication, illustrating peer review processes, editorial guidance, and integration of humanistic and technical inquiry.
Year:
2023
Institution:
University of Texas, Department of English
Authors:
Jennifer Guiliano, Roopika Risam, Tanya Clement
Document Type:
Lesson plan / Educational case study
Subject:
Digital Humanities, Peer Review, Student Publication
Target Audience:
Graduate students in Digital Humanities
Course Duration:
One semester
Publication Platform:
Reviews in Digital Humanities
Assignment Type:
Collaborative project review
Learning Outcomes:
Critical evaluation of digital projects, understanding DH methodologies, producing publishable reviews
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Topic:
Accessibility, Open Educational Resources
Document Type:
Checklist
Organization / Institution:
MSU Libraries
Author:
MSU Libraries
Target Audience:
OER Authors
Document Type:
Educational planning worksheet
Subject:
Open Educational Resources (OER) content development
Purpose:
Chapter content planning and alignment with learning objectives
Intended Users:
OER development team members
Structure:
Four-column worksheet (Learning Objectives; Content Plan; Links Found; To Do List)
Includes Example Source Author:
Tonia Dousay
Includes Example Source Platform:
Edtechbooks
License Referenced:
CC-BY
Related Resource Mentioned:
OER Assessment Mapping Worksheet
Project Phase Referenced:
Year 2 content development
Document Type:
Evaluation Framework
Subject:
Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Accessibility in Open Educational Resources
Acronym:
IDEA
Field:
Education
Resource Type:
Open Educational Resources (OER)
Structure:
Thematic Assessment Framework with Action Guidelines
Intended Use:
Creation, Assessment and Editing of Educational Materials
Key Components:
Imagery, Language, Names, References, Examples, Terminology, Metadata
Focus Areas:
Representation, Intersectionality, Stereotypes, Citation Diversity, Inclusive Metadata
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Palo Alto, CA
Theme:
Commercial medical equipment procurement
Document type:
Combined Synopsis/Solicitation Notice
Agency:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
Authorized dealers and suppliers of medical equipment
Period of action:
2018
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Australia / New Zealand
Subject:
Open Educational Resources (OER) Project
Document Type:
Grant Application
Organization / Institution:
OER Collective
Author:
Multiple contributors (Lead author, Co-authors, Institutional Contacts)
Target Audience:
Project Team, Educational Institutions, OER Developers
Period of Activity:
2025-2027
Approval Date:
TBD
Modification Date:
TBD
Year:
2023
Institution:
Indiana University Bloomington
Program:
OER Summer Sprint
Document Type:
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
Subject:
Open Educational Resources adaptation and textbook replacement
Workshops Dates:
June 5–7, 2023
Academic Year of Implementation:
AY 2023–2024
Stipend Amount:
$3,500
Payment Conditions:
Completion of workshops and teaching with new materials
Contact Person:
Haley Norris, Scholarly Communications Librarian
Copyright Oversight:
Naz Pantaloni, Head of the Copyright Program
Accessibility Standards:
BC Campus basic accessibility standards
Repository:
IUScholarWorks
Licensing Framework:
Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0 adaptation)
Governing Code:
CMFP Code of Conduct
Note:
Year
Topic:
Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Accessibility, Open Educational Resources
Document Type:
Framework
Organization / Institution:
OpenStax
Target Audience:
Educational Institutions, Educators, Content Creators
Note:
Year
Topic:
OER, Adult Education
Document Type:
Activity Instructions
Organization / Institution:
Open Adult Education
Target Audience:
Educators, Adult Education Professionals
Content Area:
ESL, Math, Technology
Additional Metadata:
Online Tools for OER Creation
Context:
An activity designed for educators to revise and remix an OER using Open Author, focusing on adult education content for ESL, math, and technology.
Year:
2026
Institution:
State University of New York
Type of document:
Implementation plan
Topic:
Open Educational Resources (OER)
Author:
SUNY OER Services @ Open SUNY Textbooks
Target audience:
Higher education administrators and faculty
Approval:
President of the institution
License:
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Scope:
Campus-wide OER initiatives
Implementation team:
Identified institutional staff and leadership roles
Assessment:
Self-assessment scores and benchmarking results
Resources required:
Policies, procedures, professional development, personnel, other institutional resources
Continuous improvement:
Ongoing monitoring, benchmarking, and periodic review cycles
Year:
2026
Audience:
Students
Type of document:
Educational guideline
Subject:
Reading comprehension and text analysis
Document format:
Protocol / Instruction
Usage context:
Core curriculum cycles
Content focus:
Nonfiction and fiction text analysis, author’s purpose, text organization, evidence-based responses
Requirements:
Completion of at least one OER and one TDA per cycle/unit
Tools:
Graphic organizer, POQ sentence, multiple choice and text-dependent questions
Year:
2022
Region / city:
Huddersfield
Topic:
Health and safety risk assessment for multifunctional devices and 3D printers in educational spaces
Document type:
Risk Assessment
Organization / institution:
University of Huddersfield, School of Arts and Humanities
Author:
Stephen Calcutt
Target audience:
Staff, students, estates and facilities staff, visitors
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
29.03.22
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2025/2026
Region / City:
Leeds
Theme:
Student Engagement, University Representation, Academic Advocacy
Document Type:
Job Description
Organization:
Leeds University Union
Author:
Leeds University Union
Target Audience:
University of Leeds students eligible to work in the UK
Start Date:
15th June 2026
End Date:
30th June 2027
Eligibility:
University of Leeds students (for academic year 2025/2026 and 2026/27) eligible to work in the UK
Position Type:
Part-time
Contract Term:
15th June 2026 to 30th June 2027
Note:
Description
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Kampala, Uganda
Subject:
Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
Document Type:
Application Form
Institution:
Makerere University
Author:
Makerere University
Target Audience:
Prospective PhD students
Period of Validity:
2026 Intake
Approval Date:
November 17, 2025
Date of Revision:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Augsburg, Munich
Subject:
Environmental Humanities, Socio-Ecological Transformation
Document Type:
Call for Applications
Institution:
University of Augsburg, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Researchers, Doctoral Candidates
Period of Application:
Deadline: January 31, 2025
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2022
Region / city:
Leiden
Topic:
University Teaching Qualification Portfolio
Document type:
Academic qualification document
Institution:
Leiden University
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Academic staff of Leiden University
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
01-02-2022
Modification date:
Not specified
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Southampton
Subject:
Ethics in Research
Document Type:
Guidelines
Institution:
University of Southampton
Author:
Faculty of Arts and Humanities
Target Audience:
Student researchers
Effective Period:
From the start of research projects before September 2019
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2015-2016
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Federal funding, Humanities, HBCUs
Document type:
Grant guide
Organization / Institution:
National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH)
Author:
NEH staff contributors: Patricia Brooks, Mary Downs, Deborah Hurtt, Brandon Johnson, Mary Macklem, Mackenzie Shutler; WHIHBCU staff contributors: Ivory A. Toldson, Tammi Ferguson
Target Audience:
Faculty and staff at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
2015
Date of Changes:
None mentioned
Context:
This document outlines federal grant programs offered by the National Endowment for the Humanities aimed at supporting research, preservation, and educational projects at Historically Black Colleges and Universities.
Year:
2015
Country:
United States
Subject:
Information collection authority under the Paperwork Reduction Act
Document type:
Supporting statement
Agency:
National Endowment for the Humanities
Oversight body:
Office of Management and Budget
OMB control number:
3136-0134
Time period covered:
1994–2015
Purpose:
Request for three-year extension of generic clearance authority
Information collections covered:
Grant application guidelines, reporting instructions, peer review forms
Method of submission:
Electronic collection via Grants.gov and eGMS
Estimated respondent burden hours:
67,105
Estimated annual cost to respondents:
$4,175,944
Estimated annual cost to agency:
$1,760,860
Use of statistical methods:
None
Public notice dates:
February 4, 2015; April 9, 2015
Source type:
Administrative and regulatory documentation explaining the scope, history, and burden estimates of federal information collection authority for humanities grant programs.
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Oxford
Topic:
Higher Doctorates
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
University of Oxford
Target Audience:
Academic Candidates
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified