№ files_lp_3_process_7_077340
File format: docx
Character count: 3717
File size: 21 KB
The document outlines the process for conducting cognitive interviews for testing the E-6 form used in the Annual Survey of Public Employment & Payroll (ASPEP).
Year:
2012
Region / City:
Philadelphia, PA
Topic:
Questionnaire Pretesting
Document Type:
Research Protocol
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Census Bureau
Author:
Jennifer Beck
Target Audience:
Researchers, Educational Institutions
Period of Validity:
September 10, 2012
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2010
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Survey Methodology / Cognitive Interview
Document Type:
Interview Protocol
Organization:
RIRS
Author:
Kenneth Pick
Target Audience:
Government data respondents
Effective Period:
Draft as of September 20, 2010
Purpose:
To guide cognitive interviews on survey question interpretation and response processes
Items Covered:
1–8, Wrap-up Questions
Data Focus:
Definitions of employee types, reporting instructions, and timeframe considerations
Year:
2010
Document Type:
Cognitive Interview Protocol
Organization:
RIRS
Author:
Kenneth Pick
Target Audience:
Government survey respondents
Purpose:
Assess comprehension and response process for survey items
Document Version:
Draft 9/20/2010
Content Focus:
Employee classification and data reporting procedures
Geographical Scope:
United States
Year:
2021
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Tuberculosis, Immigration Health, Public Health
Document Type:
Report
Institution:
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of State
Target Audience:
Public Health Officials, Health Care Providers, Immigration Officers
Period of Action:
2020-2021
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2018
Country:
United States
Issuing Agency:
U.S. Census Bureau
Division:
Economic Statistics and Methodology Division
Branch:
Data Collection Methodology & Research Branch
Survey Name:
Quarterly Survey of Public Pensions (QSPP)
Related Survey:
Annual Survey of Public Pensions (ASPP)
OMB Control Number:
0607-0725
Legal Authority:
Title 13, United States Code, Sections 161 and 182
Purpose:
Cognitive pretesting of a proposed redesign of the QSPP questionnaire
Population of Interest:
Largest defined benefit public employee pension systems for state and local governments
Methodology:
In-person and telephone cognitive interviews using think-aloud protocol
Sample Size:
10–15 interviews
Testing Period:
November–December 2018
Estimated Respondent Burden:
18.75 hours
Incentives:
None
Language of Testing:
English
Contact Person:
Kristin Stettler
Location:
Washington, D.C. 20233
Year:
2021
Month:
June
Program:
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2022
Study Title:
eNAEP and Field Trial Pretesting Study
Document Type:
Supporting Statement
Volume:
Volume I
OMB Control Number:
1850-0803 v.293
Agency:
National Center for Education Statistics
Parent Organization:
Institute of Education Sciences
Department:
U.S. Department of Education
Legal Authority:
National Assessment of Educational Progress Authorization Act (20 U.S.C. §9622)
Grades Assessed:
Grade 4; Grade 8; Grade 12
Subjects:
Mathematics; Reading; Social Studies; Writing; Science; U.S. History; Civics; Geography; Economics; The Arts
Assessment Mode:
Digitally Based Assessment (eNAEP)
Pretesting Components:
Simulated Classroom Pretesting; Field Trial
Geographic Scope:
United States (mainland); District of Columbia; Maryland; Virginia; West Virginia
Target Population:
Students in grades 4 and 8
Field Trial Schedule:
October 2021
Build Events:
Build 7 (July 28–August 3); Build 8 (September 27–October 14, 2021)
Confidentiality:
Assurance of Confidentiality included
Public Release:
Results not publicly released
Year:
2019-20
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Education, Research
Document Type:
Survey Pretesting
Organization / Institution:
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
Author:
EurekaFacts
Target Audience:
College, university, and trade school students
Period of Validity:
2018-2019 academic year
Approval Date:
December 2018
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
This document outlines recruitment materials and procedures for survey tryouts and focus groups aimed at pretesting the 2019-20 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:
20).
Year:
20--
Region / City:
Georgia
Subject:
Request for Qualifications, Design-Build Services
Document Type:
Request for Proposals
Institution / Organization:
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
Author:
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
Target Audience:
Contractors, Design-Build Firms
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Subject:
Implementation of online support tools for relatives of people with bipolar disorder and psychosis
Document type:
Participant information sheet
Organization / institution:
Lancaster University, University College London, University of Liverpool, NHS Trusts
Author:
IMPART research team
Target audience:
Relatives of patients receiving NHS mental health support
Funding:
National Institute of Health Research (NIHR)
Ethics approval:
NHS Research Ethics Committee
Duration:
Three-year study
Method:
Interviews, audio-recorded with transcription and anonymization
Purpose:
To understand barriers, facilitators, and success factors in the implementation of the REACT toolkit
Data usage:
Inform national implementation plan, academic publication, conference presentation
Author:
Simon Moss
Institution:
Charles Darwin University (CDU), Menzies School of Health Research
Type of document:
Research ethics application sample
Target audience:
Research students
Research methods:
Semi-structured interviews, focus groups, narrative analysis
Participants:
International research students, adults, healthy community members
Locations:
Darwin, various participant-chosen locations
Number of participants:
Approximately 10–15 for interviews, 2–4 focus groups with 3–10 participants each
Analysis method:
Thematic analysis, constructivist grounded theory
Topics:
Experiences of international research students, evaluation of initiatives like the community wall
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Oxford
Subject:
Education, Admissions
Document Type:
Interview Guidelines
Institution:
University of Oxford
Authors:
Dalveen, Jessica Goodman, Tom Crawford, Matthew Williams, Hannah Skoda, Will Poole, Ian (Admissions Operations Team)
Target Audience:
Prospective Students
Period of Action:
2020
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
User experience research for health programme
Document Type:
Research protocol
Organization:
[Not specified in document]
Author:
[Not specified in document]
Target Audience:
Participants of user experience research study
Period of Validity:
[Not specified in document]
Approval Date:
[Not specified in document]
Amendment Date:
[Not specified in document]
Year:
2023
Region:
Richmond area; Hanover County, Virginia
Geographic scope:
City of Richmond and Hanover County
Subject matter:
Court administration; local court practices; professional conduct
Document type:
Committee report; interview summary
Issuing body:
Administration of Justice Committee
Related organizations:
Richmond Bar Association
Courts referenced:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division; Hanover Circuit Court; Hanover General District Court; Hanover Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court
Judges referenced:
J. Overton Harris; Hugh S. Campbell; David B. Caddell; Frank G. Uvanni
Intended audience:
Attorneys and members of the local bar
Time period covered:
Annual interviews conducted in 2023
Topics addressed:
Local rules and forms; continuances; scheduling practices; courtroom decorum; remote hearings; professional development; guardian ad litem practice
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Employee exit process, feedback collection
Document type:
Guide
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Line managers, HR personnel
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Institution / Organization:
University of Canterbury
Target Audience:
Participants in the research
Document type:
Technical guidance
Thematic area:
Humanitarian shelter and displacement
Methodology:
Focus Group Discussions and Key Informant Interviews
Target population:
Affected populations, IDPs, refugees, host communities
Geographic scope:
Humanitarian contexts
Institutional reference:
CRS
Referenced standard:
Sphere Standards
Referenced publication:
Focus Group Discussions – A Practical Guide (2018)
Assistance scope:
Emergency, transitional, and permanent shelter options
Source type:
Operational guidance document
Document type:
Participant information sheet
Consent type:
Verbal consent
Research context:
Academic research
Ethics review:
Faculty Research Ethics Committee
Intended use:
Supporting documentation for ethical review and approval
Applicable legislation:
General Data Protection Regulation
Data considerations:
Personal data and special category data
Research methods:
Brief interviews, observation, ethnographic methods
Institution referenced:
De Montfort University
Target audience:
Research participants
Status:
Template with researcher-completed sections
Contextual description:
Ethical guidance document outlining requirements and procedures for informing research participants and documenting verbal consent in academic studies involving brief interviews and related qualitative methods.
Document type:
Career guide
Topic:
Job search and interview preparation
Intended audience:
Job seekers and students entering the job market
Language:
English
Format:
Multi-page informational guide
Institutional context:
University career services
Key themes:
Company research, interview preparation, professional image, etiquette
Career stage:
Entry-level and early career
Content scope:
Pre-interview preparation and professional conduct
Time period referenced:
Contemporary job market practices
Year:
2017
Location:
Grady Health System
Topic:
Chlamydia Treatment, Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT)
Document Type:
Interview Guide
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Healthcare providers (MDs, RNs, APNs, residents, etc.)
Period of Application:
N/A
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Title:
Family Planning and COVID-19: Interviews from the Field, Part Three
Speaker:
Raissa Ameh, MSN, WHNP-BC
Host:
Katherine Atcheson
Organization:
National Clinical Training Center for Family Planning
Affiliated Institution:
Missouri Family Health Council
Funding Authority:
Office of Population Affairs
Program Type:
Podcast
Series:
The Family Planning Files
Duration:
00:15:01
Topic:
Family planning service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic
Geographic Focus:
Missouri, United States
Interview Date Reference:
March 23 (COVID-19 distancing restrictions effective date)
Public Health Context:
COVID-19 global pandemic