№ lp_2_1_25323
File format: docx
Character count: 12321
File size: 45 KB
Audio interview transcript from a public health podcast series documenting adaptations in family planning service delivery in Missouri during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Title:
Family Planning and COVID-19: Interviews from the Field, Part Three
Speaker:
Raissa Ameh, MSN, WHNP-BC
Host:
Katherine Atcheson
Organization:
National Clinical Training Center for Family Planning
Affiliated Institution:
Missouri Family Health Council
Funding Authority:
Office of Population Affairs
Program Type:
Podcast
Series:
The Family Planning Files
Duration:
00:15:01
Topic:
Family planning service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic
Geographic Focus:
Missouri, United States
Interview Date Reference:
March 23 (COVID-19 distancing restrictions effective date)
Public Health Context:
COVID-19 global pandemic
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
20--
Region / City:
Georgia
Subject:
Request for Qualifications, Design-Build Services
Document Type:
Request for Proposals
Institution / Organization:
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
Author:
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
Target Audience:
Contractors, Design-Build Firms
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Subject:
Implementation of online support tools for relatives of people with bipolar disorder and psychosis
Document type:
Participant information sheet
Organization / institution:
Lancaster University, University College London, University of Liverpool, NHS Trusts
Author:
IMPART research team
Target audience:
Relatives of patients receiving NHS mental health support
Funding:
National Institute of Health Research (NIHR)
Ethics approval:
NHS Research Ethics Committee
Duration:
Three-year study
Method:
Interviews, audio-recorded with transcription and anonymization
Purpose:
To understand barriers, facilitators, and success factors in the implementation of the REACT toolkit
Data usage:
Inform national implementation plan, academic publication, conference presentation
Author:
Simon Moss
Institution:
Charles Darwin University (CDU), Menzies School of Health Research
Type of document:
Research ethics application sample
Target audience:
Research students
Research methods:
Semi-structured interviews, focus groups, narrative analysis
Participants:
International research students, adults, healthy community members
Locations:
Darwin, various participant-chosen locations
Number of participants:
Approximately 10–15 for interviews, 2–4 focus groups with 3–10 participants each
Analysis method:
Thematic analysis, constructivist grounded theory
Topics:
Experiences of international research students, evaluation of initiatives like the community wall
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Oxford
Subject:
Education, Admissions
Document Type:
Interview Guidelines
Institution:
University of Oxford
Authors:
Dalveen, Jessica Goodman, Tom Crawford, Matthew Williams, Hannah Skoda, Will Poole, Ian (Admissions Operations Team)
Target Audience:
Prospective Students
Period of Action:
2020
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
User experience research for health programme
Document Type:
Research protocol
Organization:
[Not specified in document]
Author:
[Not specified in document]
Target Audience:
Participants of user experience research study
Period of Validity:
[Not specified in document]
Approval Date:
[Not specified in document]
Amendment Date:
[Not specified in document]
Year:
2023
Region:
Richmond area; Hanover County, Virginia
Geographic scope:
City of Richmond and Hanover County
Subject matter:
Court administration; local court practices; professional conduct
Document type:
Committee report; interview summary
Issuing body:
Administration of Justice Committee
Related organizations:
Richmond Bar Association
Courts referenced:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division; Hanover Circuit Court; Hanover General District Court; Hanover Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court
Judges referenced:
J. Overton Harris; Hugh S. Campbell; David B. Caddell; Frank G. Uvanni
Intended audience:
Attorneys and members of the local bar
Time period covered:
Annual interviews conducted in 2023
Topics addressed:
Local rules and forms; continuances; scheduling practices; courtroom decorum; remote hearings; professional development; guardian ad litem practice
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Employee exit process, feedback collection
Document type:
Guide
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Line managers, HR personnel
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Institution / Organization:
University of Canterbury
Target Audience:
Participants in the research
Document type:
Technical guidance
Thematic area:
Humanitarian shelter and displacement
Methodology:
Focus Group Discussions and Key Informant Interviews
Target population:
Affected populations, IDPs, refugees, host communities
Geographic scope:
Humanitarian contexts
Institutional reference:
CRS
Referenced standard:
Sphere Standards
Referenced publication:
Focus Group Discussions – A Practical Guide (2018)
Assistance scope:
Emergency, transitional, and permanent shelter options
Source type:
Operational guidance document
Document type:
Participant information sheet
Consent type:
Verbal consent
Research context:
Academic research
Ethics review:
Faculty Research Ethics Committee
Intended use:
Supporting documentation for ethical review and approval
Applicable legislation:
General Data Protection Regulation
Data considerations:
Personal data and special category data
Research methods:
Brief interviews, observation, ethnographic methods
Institution referenced:
De Montfort University
Target audience:
Research participants
Status:
Template with researcher-completed sections
Contextual description:
Ethical guidance document outlining requirements and procedures for informing research participants and documenting verbal consent in academic studies involving brief interviews and related qualitative methods.
Document type:
Career guide
Topic:
Job search and interview preparation
Intended audience:
Job seekers and students entering the job market
Language:
English
Format:
Multi-page informational guide
Institutional context:
University career services
Key themes:
Company research, interview preparation, professional image, etiquette
Career stage:
Entry-level and early career
Content scope:
Pre-interview preparation and professional conduct
Time period referenced:
Contemporary job market practices
Year:
2017
Location:
Grady Health System
Topic:
Chlamydia Treatment, Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT)
Document Type:
Interview Guide
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Healthcare providers (MDs, RNs, APNs, residents, etc.)
Period of Application:
N/A
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Canada
Theme:
Memory sports, Canadian Memory Championship
Document Type:
Interview
Organization / Institution:
Canadian Memory Championship
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Memory sports enthusiasts, general public
Period of Validity:
N/A
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2021
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
Trade-Based Money Laundering (TBML)
Document Type:
Research Data
Institution / Organization:
Self-funded
Author:
Mariola Marzouk
Target Audience:
Academic researchers, financial professionals, law enforcement, policymakers
Duration:
April 2020 - August 2020
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Durham
Service:
Adult and Health Services
Team:
NQSW Team
Document type:
Portfolio / Assessment Tool
Author:
NQSW
Assessor:
ASYE Assessor
Line manager:
Line Manager (if different from ASYE Assessor)
Employing organisation:
Durham County Council
Period covered:
First three months of ASYE
Standards referenced:
Post Qualifying Standards (PQS), Knowledge and Skills Statement (KSS)
Sections included:
Foundational Review, Supervision Log, Training Log, Protected Development Time Log, Self-Assessment Tool, Professional Development Plan, Direct Observation, Feedback Records, Verification of Professional Documentation
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Somerset East
Theme:
Guarding Services, Alarm Systems, Armed Response
Document Type:
Tender
Organization / Institution:
Blue Crane Route Municipality
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Potential service providers
Period of Validity:
3 years
Approval Date:
09 January 2026
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Nelson Mandela Bay, Eastern Cape
Subject:
Procurement of Integrated Enterprise Reporting System
Document Type:
Request for Bid
Institution:
Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality (NMBM)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Bidders, suppliers, municipal stakeholders
Effective Period:
36 months
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
Procurement document for a system aimed at improving the operational efficiency and reporting structure of the Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality.
Year:
2025–26
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Verification, School Meals, Educational Benefits
Document Type:
Regulatory Requirement
Organization:
USDA
Target Audience:
School Food Authorities
Period of Validity:
2025–26
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
A regulatory document detailing the verification reporting requirements for the National School Lunch Program for the 2025–26 school year, outlining the SFAs required to use the "Three Percent Error-Prone" sampling method for application verification.
Note:
Year