№ lp_1_30981
File format: docx
Character count: 19968
File size: 263 KB
Instructional document outlining the structure, formatting, and style requirements for theses at Tampere University, including guidance on abstracts, prefaces, chapters, references, and use of MS Word styles.
Year:
2019
Institution:
Tampere University
Document Type:
Instructional Template
Language:
English, Finnish
Audience:
Students preparing theses in technical fields
Content Includes:
Abstract, Preface, Contents, References, Appendices, Figures, Tables, Symbols
Keywords:
Thesis, Abstract, Writing Style, Referencing, MS Word
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Tampere
Subject:
Academic writing guidelines
Document type:
Template
Institution:
Tampere University
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
Students, researchers
Effective period:
Ongoing
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Year:
2013–2025
Institution:
Tampere University, Unit of Computing Sciences, Finland
Course codes:
COMP.SE.610, COMP.SE.620
Type of document:
Final project report
Authors:
Peter Productowner, Paula Projectmanager, Harry Master, Ted Hill, Course Staff
Group:
Project team (names not fully listed)
Project scope:
Software development projects including AI-assisted coding and sprint-based implementation
Contents:
Project organization, implementation, AI usage, sprints, retrospectives, deliverables, limitations, third-party components, GDPR compliance, working hours, quality assurance, risks, lessons learned, course feedback, statistics
Version history:
0.1–0.14 (2013–2025)
Target audience:
Course instructors, stakeholders, project participants
Institution:
Tampere University
Country:
Finland
City:
Tampere
Document Type:
Application Form
Purpose:
Application for fixed-term doctoral student positions and related funding
Academic Level:
Doctoral Studies
Fields of Study:
Medicine; Biosciences; Biomedical Engineering; Health Science
Degrees:
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD); Doctor of Medical Science (MD PhD); Doctor of Science (Tech.); Doctor of Health Sciences
Applicant Information:
Personal data, education background, thesis grading
Doctoral Thesis Information:
Study right status, thesis title, supervisors, thesis committee, progress of dissertation
Research Career Information:
Work experience, publications, awards, doctoral coursework credits
Funding Information:
Current and previous funding sources, funding period, full-time or part-time dissertation work
Affiliation Requirement:
Doctoral research conducted under supervision at Tampere University
Related Academic Process:
Doctoral dissertation preparation and evaluation
Year:
2020–2023
Region / City:
Finland, Tampere
Subject:
Children’s rights, climate change, youth participation, digital democracy
Document type:
Submission / Research report
Institution:
Tampere University, University of Helsinki, University of Eastern Finland
Author:
ALL-YOUTH Research Project
Target audience:
Committee on the Rights of the Child, policymakers, researchers
Related events:
Virtual conference “Youth, Climate Change and the ECtHR”, 27 November 2020
Legal framework:
Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Aarhus Convention, Finnish Climate Act (Section 21 b)
Key concepts:
Future generations, vulnerability of children, right to be heard, access to justice, digital participation tools
Date of amendment:
1 March 2023
Implementation focus:
Youth consultation in climate policy, national and local level remedies, participatory digital tools
Note:
Year
Topic:
Communication, Interpersonal Styles
Document Type:
Article
Year:
2013
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Templates, Styles
Document Type:
User Guide
Organization / Institution:
Microsoft
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Users of Microsoft Word
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Management and Leadership Styles
Document Type:
Educational Activity
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Business students
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2018
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Attachment styles, emotional intelligence, primary care
Document Type:
Research Article
Institution:
University of Liverpool, Lancaster University, Swansea University
Author:
M. Gemma Cherry, Ian Fletcher, Damon Berridge, Helen O’Sullivan
Target Audience:
Medical professionals, researchers in psychology and healthcare
Period of Action:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Document type:
Research data tables
Subject:
Influenza vaccination communication
Population:
Healthcare Professionals (HCP)
Communication style conditions:
Autonomy-supportive communication style; Controlling communication style
Variables:
Readability percentage; Word count; Perceived threat to freedom
Statistical measures:
Mean (M); Standard deviation (SD); Skewness; Kurtosis; Standard error (SE)
Number of statements per condition:
19
Context:
Flu vaccination promotion during flu season
Data structure:
Comparative analysis by communication style condition
Document type:
Supplementary information
Related article:
An ensemble method utilising multiple thinking styles that boosts the wisdom of the inner crowd effect
Authors:
Itsuki Fujisaki; Lingxi Yu; Yuki Tsukamura; Kunhao Yang; Kazuhiro Ueda
Corresponding authors:
Itsuki Fujisaki; Kazuhiro Ueda
Email:
[email protected]
Experiments:
Experiment 1; Experiment 2
Methods:
Ensemble method; optimal weighting; averaging; mixed-effects analysis; ANOVA; parameter estimation; Bayesian modelling
Software:
R (brms package)
Variables:
Intuition; Deliberation; Dialectic; General crowd; Disagree-other; MSE; confidence; diversity; collective performance
Statistical parameters:
slope a; intercept b; prior variance 300; four chains; 5,000 samplings; 2,000 warm-up; seed 1; convergence criterion R < 1.1
Tables:
S1–S3
Figures:
S1–S9
References:
Fujisaki et al. (2023); Rauhut & Lorenz (2011)
Title:
Decision-making styles
Language:
English
Document type:
Educational workbook
Subject:
Career decision-making
Structure:
Three-step reflective exercise
Key topics:
Decision-making habits, 11 decision-making dimensions, self-assessment scales, reflection and habit change
Assessment format:
1–5 rating scales with descriptive anchors
Intended audience:
Individuals considering post-16 options and future career decisions
Purpose:
Identification and reflection on personal decision-making habits
Examples included:
Two worked examples on gathering information dimension
Action component:
Personal reflection and written action plan
Subject:
Learning strategies and learning styles
Document Type:
Educational assignment
Course:
Learning Strategies 10–12
Module:
Module 1
Assessment Title:
Personal Skills Inventory
Assessment Method:
Questionnaire and short written responses
Assessment Tool Referenced:
VARK learning styles questionnaire
Website:
www.vark-learn.com
Total Point Value:
35 points
Structure:
Pre-assessment questions and post-assessment reflection questions
Key Concepts:
VARK learning styles, multimodal learning, study strategies, learning preferences
Target Audience:
Students enrolled in Learning Strategies 10–12
Required Response Format:
Complete sentences
Organization:
General Electric (GE)
Document Type:
Internal email template and formatting note
Access Level:
GE Internal Use Only
Subject:
Email layout and formatting guidelines
Software:
Microsoft Outlook
Elements Included:
Title text, subtitle text, body text, contact section
Color Specifications:
Page color RGB 240-241-242; title color 0-94-184; body text color 51-51-51
Font Size Guidance:
Title 25; subtitle 12; section title 14; body text 10
Purpose:
Standardized formatting for internal email communications
Contact Section:
Email contact placeholder for story submissions and feedback
Intended Audience:
GE employees and internal communications staff
Year:
1991
Region / City:
International
Subject:
Conflict resolution and negotiation strategies
Document type:
Educational / Guidance text
Authors:
Kenneth Thomas, Ralph Kilmann; Reference: Fisher, Ury, and Patton
Target audience:
Professionals, managers, and students in organizational behavior
Conflict styles covered:
Competition, Accommodation, Avoidance, Compromise, Collaboration
Key concepts:
Conflict handling, interests vs. positions, problem-solving strategies
Year:
Not specified
Field of Study:
Psychology
Research Topic:
Parenting styles, self-criticism, and dishonest behavior in children
Document Type:
Supplemental research materials
Methodology:
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
Statistical Measures:
χ², CFI, TLI, SRMR, RMSEA, bootstrap confidence intervals
Sample Size:
Cheating analyses (n = 332; n = 294), lying analyses (n = 208; n = 182)
Variables:
Authoritarian parenting, authoritative parenting, children’s self-criticism, cheating tendency, lying behavior
Parent Roles Examined:
Maternal and paternal parenting styles
Data Handling Method:
Listwise deletion for missing values
Instrument Referenced:
Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ)
Sections Included:
Participant flow chart; confirmatory factor analysis; SEM analyses with covariates; SEM involving authoritative parenting; SEM using listwise deletion
Year:
2012
Source:
The Mentor’s Guide
Author:
Lois J. Zachary
Section / Case Title:
Chad and Nate
Document Type:
Book excerpt / mentoring case example
Subject:
Mentoring relationships and communication styles
Main Individuals:
Chad; Nate
Relationship Type:
Mentor–mentee
Topic:
Differences in interpersonal and decision-making styles
Setting:
Professional mentoring context
Key Focus:
Establishing ground rules to address contrasting personal styles in mentoring interactions
Document type:
Academic guidelines
Document section:
Appendix
Subject area:
Higher education
Academic level:
Undergraduate
Thesis types:
Experimental study; Review study
Language:
English
Institutional context:
University faculty supervision
Requirements covered:
Thesis structure; Writing rules; Formatting standards; Plagiarism policy
Document purpose:
Guidance on preparation, writing, and formatting of graduation theses