№ files_lp_4_process_3_088453
File format: docx
Character count: 22340
File size: 93 KB
Educational source analyzing the legal implications of defamation and privacy breaches on the Internet using the 1994 EPS case study and relevant South African court decisions.
Year:
1994
Region:
International / Internet
Subject:
Internet law, privacy, defamation
Document type:
Case study / educational material
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Law students, legal professionals
Legal references:
Le Roux v Dey (Freedom of Expression Institute and Another as amici curiae) 2011 3 SA 274 (CC), Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002
Key topics:
Defamation, privacy, Internet service providers, liability
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Telecommunications
Document Type:
Change Request
Organization / Institution:
3GPP
Author:
Lenovo, Motorola Mobility
Target Audience:
WG1 members, 3GPP TSG
Period of Validity:
2020-08-13 to ongoing
Approval Date:
2020-08-13
Change Date:
N/A
Release:
Rel-16
Category:
F
Work Item Code:
TEI16
Proposed Change Affects:
UICC apps, ME, Radio Access Network, Core Network
Summary:
A Change Request to improve IMS session establishment by subscribing the P-CSCF to event notifications defined in TS 29.514 for EPS fallback.
Year:
1995
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Pension Scheme
Document Type:
Application Form
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Pension scheme applicants
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
England, Wales
Topic:
Electronic Prescription Service, Endorsement Guidance
Document Type:
Guidance
Organ / Institution:
NHSBSA
Author:
Martin Hagan, Phil Edwards, Tess Zahri, Susan Grieve
Target Audience:
Prescribers, Dispensers, Pharmaceutical Services, NHS Staff
Period of Validity:
Indefinite
Approval Date:
27/03/2023
Note:
Amendment History
28/09/2004:
First draft for comment
10/02/2005:
Second draft for review
23/08/2005:
Marked as approved
08/04/2005:
Updates following publication of the Drug Tariff
27/03/2023:
Changes relating to EPS in Wales
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Educational program, Grant proposal, Data Use Agreement
Document Type:
FAQ
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Investigators, Scholars
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Organisation:
NHS Digital
Programme:
Electronic Prescription Service (EPS)
Related system:
Electronic Transfer of Prescriptions (ETP)
Context:
COVID-19 pandemic
Audience:
EPS prescribers and pharmacy teams
Sector:
Primary care and urgent care
Geographic scope:
England
Systems referenced:
TPP SystmOne, EMIS, Microtest, Vision, Advanced Adastra, IC24
Subject:
Remote prescribing, Phase 4 roll-out, urgent prescriptions, one-off nomination
Document type:
Operational update and guidance
Year:
2020
Region / City:
United States, Saipan, Alaska, Hawaii
Subject:
Event Planning Services
Document Type:
Performance Work Statement
Author:
U.S. Government
Target Audience:
Contractors and Service Providers
Period of Action:
Up to 12 months prior to event execution
Approval Date:
4 May 2020
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Construction Materials
Document Type:
Technical Specification
Organization / Agency:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Construction engineers and contractors
Application Period:
During EPS geofoam block installation
Standards Referenced:
ASTM D6817, ASTM D7557, Section 96-1.02S, Section 96-1.02T
Materials Covered:
Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) geofoam blocks, gasoline resistant geomembrane
Construction Requirements:
Subgrade preparation, EPS block placement, geomembrane installation, quality assurance
Submission Requirements:
Manufacturer’s technical data, certificates of compliance, shop drawings
Quality Control:
Third-party verification, training, preconstruction meetings, on-site supervision
Construction Tolerances:
Vertical deviation <0.5 inches per 10 feet, finished grade tolerance <3 inches
Equipment Restrictions:
No direct operation on EPS blocks or geomembrane, protection from UV and petroleum products
Handling Instructions:
Proper placement, protection from damage, securement, seam bonding per manufacturer instructions
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Online
Topic:
Security
Document Type:
Change Request
Organization:
3GPP
Author:
Intel
Target Audience:
Working Group participants
Effective Period:
2020-03-02
Approval Date:
2020-03-02
Modification Date:
N/A
Work Item Code:
TEI15
Release:
Rel-15
Category:
F
Clauses Affected:
7.4.X (new), 7.4.Y (new)
Year:
2014-2016
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
EPS Core Panel Technology adoption
Document Type:
Technical Requirement
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Construction firms and professionals in the EPS panel industry
Period of Application:
Ongoing
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Contextual Description:
Technical guidelines for adopting EPS Core Panel Technology, including equipment specifications and infrastructure requirements for construction firms.
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Goa, India
Topic:
Change request for GEO voice data transport
Document Type:
Change Request
Organization:
3GPP
Author:
vivo
Target Audience:
3GPP Working Groups, SA2
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
2026-01-30
Amendment Date:
N/A
Proposed change:
Documentation of required normative work for GEO voice data transport over UP IP.
Consequences if not approved:
GEO voice data transport over UP IP will not be supported.
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Byron Center, Michigan, USA
Subject:
Thermal insulation materials
Document Type:
Product guide specification
Organization / Institution:
Atlas EPS, a Division of Atlas Roofing Corporation
Author:
Atlas EPS Technical Team
Target Audience:
Architects, designers, contractors
Standards Referenced:
ASTM C203, C272, C578, D1621, E84, E96/E96M; AWPA E7; CAN/ULC S701; ICC AC239; NFPA 285, 286
Products Covered:
ThermalStar X Grade, X Grade GX, LCi, LCi GX, LCi Perforated, EIFS, T&G, T&G GX
Applications:
Perimeter foundation, below-grade, below-slab, above-grade, cavity wall, continuous wall insulation, EIFS, one coat stucco
Warranty:
Lifetime insulation performance and termite resistance per AWPA E7
Delivery / Storage:
Original, unopened containers; protect from sunlight, high heat, and incompatible chemicals
Installation Requirements:
Follow manufacturer instructions; installer qualifications required; field test compatibility with other materials
Note:
Year
Region / city:
New Delhi
Theme:
Defamation, Legal Notice
Document type:
Legal Notice
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Big Pine Key, FL
Topic:
Legal Action, Defamation
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Author:
Christopher Ambrose
Target Audience:
Legal Professionals, Public Figures, Internet Users
Period of Action:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
April 14, 2022
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Melbourne
Subject:
Defamation
Document Type:
Court Judgment
Court / Institution:
County Court of Victoria
Author:
Judge Smith
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, public
Effective Period:
From 4 January 2017
Approval Date:
22 December 2017
Modification Date:
Revised judgment on 22 December 2017
Year:
2025
Edition:
TMUC Edition, Version 2.1
Author:
Eric E. Johnson
Original Publication:
CALI eLangdell Press, First Edition 2016
Type of Document:
Casebooklet
Subject:
Trade Libel, Defamation, Product Disparagement, Torts Law
License:
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Intended Audience:
Law students, legal educators, and researchers
Revision History:
Version 2.0 (2019), First Edition (2016)
Publisher:
Eric E. Johnson (self-published for this edition)
Content Source:
Adapted from Torts: Cases & Context, Volume Two, Pylon Edition, Version 2.10
Appolus Incorporated v Mutumba: High Court of Namibia Judgment on Defamation and Debt Recovery, 2025
Year:
2025
Country:
Namibia
Court Division:
Main Division, High Court of Namibia
Case Number:
HC-MD-CIV-ACT-DEL-2023/03158
Plaintiffs:
Thomas Appolus Incorporated, Thomas Gert Appolus
Defendant:
Terrance Kilautsi Mutaba
Type of Document:
Court Judgment
Legal Area:
Defamation, Debt Recovery, Legal Services
Hearing Date:
21 January 2025
Delivery Date:
2 April 2025
Judge:
Honourable ADJP Ndauendapo
Neutral Citation:
[2025] NAHCMD 145
Relief Ordered:
Dismissal of first plaintiff’s claim, second plaintiff awarded N$40 000 with 20% interest and costs
Document Source:
High Court of Namibia, eJustice Portal
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
Legislative Amendments
Document Type:
Bill
Author:
Evan Mulholland
Target Audience:
Legislators, Government Officials
Period of Effect:
2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
2024
Jurisdiction:
United States
State:
Colorado
Legal field:
Defamation law
Subject:
Libel and slander
Document type:
Legal doctrine and jury instruction commentary
Related constitutional provisions:
First Amendment; Fourteenth Amendment
Key court decisions cited:
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964); St. Amant v. Thompson (1968); Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts (1967); Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974)
Courts referenced:
Supreme Court of the United States; Colorado Supreme Court; Colorado Court of Appeals
Legal concepts addressed:
actual malice; reckless disregard; public official; public figure; private plaintiff; privilege defenses; damages in defamation cases
Procedural concepts:
clear and convincing evidence; independent review; de novo review
Purpose:
explanation of liability standards and defenses in defamation cases under constitutional and Colorado law
Year:
1964–1985
Jurisdiction:
United States, primarily New York and Colorado
Subject:
Defamation law, Libel, Slander, First Amendment
Document Type:
Legal commentary / Case law summary
Court Cases Referenced:
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, St. Amant v. Thompson, Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., Walker v. Colorado Springs Sun, Inc., Diversified Management, Inc. v. Denver Post, Inc., Rowe v. Metz, Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.
Legal Concepts:
Actual malice, reckless disregard, public official, public figure, private individual, clear and convincing evidence, constitutional privilege
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, scholars, law students
Period Covered:
1964–1985