№ lp_2_3_43115
File format: docx
Character count: 5088
File size: 447 KB
This lesson plan focuses on teaching students the essential elements of cross-examination in Lincoln-Douglas and Policy Debate, covering both theory and practice.
Note:
Year
Subject:
Debate, Cross-Examination
Document Type:
Lesson Plan
Target Audience:
Students
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Activity:
Lincoln-Douglas Debate
Format:
Framework Blocks and Theory Arguments
Primary Focus:
Utilitarianism, Contractualism, Pacifism, Fully Autonomous Weapons
Referenced Source:
Roger Crisp, Well-Being, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta
Referenced Author:
Bonnie Docherty
Referenced Organization:
Human Rights Watch
Referenced Legal Principle:
Martens Clause
Argument Sections:
AT Util NC1AR RestartAFC; Spec Util; Epistemic Modesty Bad; TJFs Bad; Contracts Hijack; Pacifism Hijack
Philosophical Theories Discussed:
Hedonism; Desire Theories; Objective List Theories; Welfarism; Rule Consequentialism; Act Utilitarianism
Intended Audience:
Competitive Debate Participants
Context:
Round Strategy and Framework Interpretation
Use of Evidence:
Philosophical Encyclopedia Entry; Policy Report
Year:
1858
Location:
United States, Illinois
Subject:
Slavery, Civil Rights, Political Debate
Document Type:
Educational Assignment / Debate Analysis
Institution:
Educational Curriculum
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students
Debate Participants:
Abraham Lincoln, Stephen Douglas
Key Issues:
Expansion of slavery, state sovereignty, racial equality
Assignment Type:
Writing task analyzing political positions
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Debate Education / Argumentation
Document Type:
Lesson Plan
Institution:
National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA) referenced
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Beginner debate students
Skill Level:
Beginner
Time Frame:
Part 1 – Essential Elements; Part 2 – Detailed Step-by-Step Lesson
Focus Skill:
Argument construction, case writing, evidence use
Materials:
Oxford English Dictionary, Black’s Law Dictionary, Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Smart Devices
Homework Assignment:
Students to gather opinions on the example resolution and main arguments
Year:
2021
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Subject:
Domestic abuse, Family law, Court procedures
Document Type:
Draft order template
Author:
HM Courts & Tribunals Service
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, Courts, Legal representatives
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Jurisdiction:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Domestic abuse, Legal proceedings
Document type:
Registration form
Institution:
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS)
Target audience:
Qualified legal representatives, Solicitors, Barristers
Training required:
Vulnerable witness or domestic abuse training
Deadline:
Friday 27 May
Contact:
Shan Maraj, tel: 07580 701407
Period of validity:
Until further notice
Date of approval:
N/A
Description:
Registration form for qualified legal representatives seeking to conduct cross-examination in family and civil proceedings involving domestic abuse cases.
Year:
2023
Region / city:
England
Topic:
Criminal justice, vulnerable witnesses, cross-examination
Document type:
Research article
Institution:
Ministry of Justice
Author:
Samantha Fairclough
Target audience:
Legal professionals, researchers, policymakers
Effective period:
2020–2022
Date of approval:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Victoria
Theme:
Criminal Procedure
Document Type:
Legal Application Form
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Legal Professionals, Accused Party, Prosecution
Period of Validity:
Until 28 December 2025
Approval Date:
Unknown
Date of Amendments:
Unknown
Year:
2023
Jurisdiction:
New York, USA
Subject:
Evidence Law, Criminal and Civil Procedure
Document Type:
Legal Guidance / Statutory Commentary
Issuing Authority:
New York State Courts
Relevant Case Law:
People v Zackowitz, Noonan v Luther, McKane v Howard, People v Mullin, People v Mann, People v Aharonowicz, People v Van Gaasbeck, People v Miller, People v Richardson, People v Hinksman, People v Rodawald, Matter of Robert S., People v Petty
Audience:
Legal professionals, law students, judges, attorneys
Legal References:
CPL 60.42, CPL 60.43, Guide to New York Evidence rules 8.39, Article Six
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Diocese of Bath and Wells
Topic:
General Synod debate, LGBTQI+ inclusion, Church doctrine, same-sex relationships
Document type:
Official Church letter
Institution:
Church of England
Authors:
Rt Revd Michael Beasley, Rt Revd Ruth Worsley
Target audience:
Clergy, laity, Christians of the Diocese of Bath and Wells
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
February 2023
Modification date:
Not specified
Note:
Teacher
Unit:
Policy Debate
Lesson Title:
The Negative: An Introduction
Level:
Beginner / Intermediate / Advanced
Focus Skill:
Introduction to Policy Debate: The Negative
Time Frame:
2.5 Hours
Type of Document:
Lesson Plan
Target Audience:
Students learning policy debate
Session Structure:
Step-by-step activities with time allocations
Key Topics:
Negative team roles, offense vs defense, on case vs off case arguments, constructing 1NC, block division, rebuttals
Materials:
NSDA Cross-Examination textbook, PowerPoint slides, handouts
Note:
Year
Subject:
Debate
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
High school students, novice debaters
Contextual Description:
A guide on the structure and key aspects of a debate round, including roles of debaters and judges, disclosure processes, and etiquette.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
N/A
Subject:
Christian ecotheology, ecological critique, environmental ethics
Document Type:
Academic article
Institution:
University of the Western Cape
Author:
Ernst M. Conradie
Target Audience:
Scholars and practitioners in theology, ecotheology, and environmental ethics
Period of Application:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Year:
2025
Location:
Minneapolis, MN
Topic:
Speech and Debate Tournament
Document Type:
Invitation
Organization:
Minnesota Collegiate Forensics Association
Author:
Minnesota Collegiate Forensics Association Executive Committee
Target Audience:
Community colleges, colleges, and universities in Minnesota, South Dakota, North Dakota, Iowa, and Wisconsin
Period of Activity:
February 21-22, 2025
Approval Date:
October 2024
Modification Date:
October 2024
Year:
2015
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Climate Change, Policy, Public Health, National Security
Document Type:
Speech
Organization / Institution:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Government of the United States
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
General Public, Policymakers
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2016
Region / City:
Darwin
Topic:
Darwinism, Religion, Christianity, Evolution
Document Type:
Lecture
Organization:
N/A
Author:
Professor Alister McGrath
Target Audience:
Scholars and students of philosophy, theology, and evolutionary biology
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Organization:
Harry C. Behler Debate Society (Colgate Debate Society)
Institutional Affiliation:
Colgate University
Document Type:
Organizational Constitution
Scope:
Governance and Operations of a Student Organization
Membership Eligibility:
Current Colgate University Students
Governing Body:
Executive Board
Executive Positions:
President, Vice-President, Treasurer, Secretary, On-Campus Organizational Coordinator, External Relations Coordinator, Debate Coordinator
Voting Rules:
Simple Majority of Executive Board
Programming:
Debate Training, Novice Debate Training, Showpiece Debates, Speaking Competitions, Outreach, Colgate Intervarsity Tournament
Annual Events:
Kingsford Speaking Competition, Lewis Oratorical Prize, Stevenson Prize for Expository Speaking, President’s Cup, Colgate Open
Quorum Requirements:
Three Voting Members Including President or Vice-President for Meetings; Four Voting Members for Votes
Advisor Status:
Debate Coordinator (Non-Voting Except in Case of Tie)
Note:
Year
Theme:
First aid, values, kindness
Document type:
Educational activity guide
Organization / institution:
British Red Cross
Target audience:
Young people
Year:
2019
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Speech and Debate Education
Document Type:
Announcement
Organization / Institution:
National Speech & Debate Association
Author:
National Speech & Debate Association
Target Audience:
Students, Teachers, Educators
Effective Date:
March 1, 2019
Date of Approval:
March 1, 2019
Date of Changes:
N/A
Type:
Educational worksheet
Subject:
Debate preparation
Purpose:
Organization of arguments and rebuttals for a debate
Structure:
Sections for main points, grounds, supporting sources, counterarguments, analysis, and speech
Intended Use:
Classroom or academic debate setting
Related Materials:
Character role sheet, primary source readings, repertoire anthology or game book
Format:
Structured outline with numbered prompts
Note:
Year
Topic:
Debate, adjudication, argument evaluation
Document type:
Guidelines
Target Audience:
Judges, debaters