№ files_lp_3_process_7_084146
File format: docx
Character count: 5522
File size: 141 KB
This document outlines the policy and procedures for dealing with cheating, malpractice, and plagiarism in the context of teaching and learning, establishing definitions, rights, responsibilities, and steps for handling incidents.
Year:
2014
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Cheating, Malpractice, Plagiarism
Document Type:
Policy
Organization:
MFYP Ltd
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Learners, Tutors, Assessors
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
Not specified
Field of Study:
Psychology
Research Topic:
Parenting styles, self-criticism, and dishonest behavior in children
Document Type:
Supplemental research materials
Methodology:
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
Statistical Measures:
χ², CFI, TLI, SRMR, RMSEA, bootstrap confidence intervals
Sample Size:
Cheating analyses (n = 332; n = 294), lying analyses (n = 208; n = 182)
Variables:
Authoritarian parenting, authoritative parenting, children’s self-criticism, cheating tendency, lying behavior
Parent Roles Examined:
Maternal and paternal parenting styles
Data Handling Method:
Listwise deletion for missing values
Instrument Referenced:
Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ)
Sections Included:
Participant flow chart; confirmatory factor analysis; SEM analyses with covariates; SEM involving authoritative parenting; SEM using listwise deletion
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Germany
Theme:
Dance
Document Type:
Dance Routine
Author:
Tomasz & Angela
Target Audience:
Dance Enthusiasts
Period of Validity:
December 2025
Date of Approval:
December 2025
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Note:
Description
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Sheffield
Theme:
Academic Integrity
Document Type:
Quiz
Institution:
University of Sheffield Library
Author:
University of Sheffield Library
Target Audience:
Students
Period of validity:
Indefinite
Approval Date:
September 2024
Review Date:
Summer 2025
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Florida
Theme:
Academic Integrity
Document Type:
FAQ
Institution:
Florida SouthWestern State College
Author:
Florida SouthWestern State College
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Validity:
Indefinite
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Sheffield
Theme:
Education, Academic Writing
Document Type:
Tutorial
Institution:
The University of Sheffield Library
Author:
The University of Sheffield Library
Target Audience:
School and college students, Apprentices
Period of Application:
September 2024 – Summer 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Last Review:
September 2024
Date of Next Review:
Summer 2025
Year:
2018
Institution:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Department:
Department of Gender Studies
Type of document:
Guide / Academic Policy
Audience:
Students
Topic:
Plagiarism, Academic Integrity, Citation
Scope:
Undergraduate and Graduate Coursework
Document status:
Updated August 2018
Format:
Digital and Print
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Leiden
Subject:
Plagiarism
Document type:
Code of Conduct
Organization:
Leiden University
Author:
Executive Board
Target audience:
Students
Effective date:
1 September 2023
Approval date:
11 July 2023
Contextual description:
Document outlining the university’s policies on plagiarism, including definitions, consequences, and rules for quoting sources and using AI-generated texts.
Year:
2023
Course/Section:
PsychSim
Instructor:
N/A
Target Audience:
Students
Document Type:
Assignment Instructions
Academic Institution:
KPU (Kwantlen Polytechnic University)
Related Topics:
Plagiarism, Academic Integrity, Memory, Recall
Keywords:
PsychSim, Cued Recall, False Memory, Memory Retrieval, Free Recall, Recognition, Relearning
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Academic Integrity
Document Type:
Educational Material
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Document Type:
Educational worksheet
Institution / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students
Source Type:
Video-based learning material
Date Published:
2026
Language:
English
Video URL:
https://youtu.be/Id2cyEBgz9I
Institution:
University of East Anglia
Partner Institution:
SEC
Document Type:
Academic policy
Subject:
Academic integrity, plagiarism and collusion in student work
Applies To:
Undergraduate students and graduates of SEC programmes
Responsible Role:
Programme Partnership Manager acting as Plagiarism Officer
Authority:
Senate of the University of East Anglia
Assessment Context:
Coursework, reports, presentations, dissertations, projects and examinations
Detection Method:
Turnitin text-matching software
Possible Sanctions:
Module failure, degree failure, temporary suspension, permanent expulsion, revocation or reduction of awarded degree
Scope:
All formative and summative assessments submitted by students
Investigation Procedure:
Evidence collection by markers and review by the Plagiarism Officer
Submission Requirement:
Student declaration that submitted work is original and properly referenced
Year:
2025/26
Region / City:
Brymore Academy
Topic:
Malpractice in Examinations and Assessments
Document Type:
Policy
Organization:
Brymore Academy
Author:
Stefan McHale, Lisa Gardner
Target Audience:
Academy staff, examiners, candidates
Validity Period:
2025/26
Approval Date:
November 2025
Date of Next Review:
November 2026
Key Staff Involved:
Stefan McHale (Head of Centre), Lisa Gardner (Exams Officer)
Year:
2025
Region / City:
New South Wales
Topic:
Malpractice prevention, school-based assessment
Document type:
Policy
Organization / Institution:
NSW Department of Education
Author:
NSW Department of Education
Target audience:
Teachers, school administrators, students
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Reporting Form
Organ / Institution:
SFJ Awards
Target Audience:
Learners, Centres
Note:
Year
Note:
Date
Organisation:
CILT (UK)
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Goodland, KS
Field:
Medicine, Law
Document Type:
Resume/Curriculum Vitae
Organization / Institution:
Mitchell Hamline School of Law, Indiana University School of Medicine, University of Chicago
Author:
Norman D. Means, MD
Target Audience:
Potential employers in medical-legal fields, law and healthcare professionals
Period of Action:
2020-2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Subject:
Medical Malpractice
Document Type:
Draft Form
Organization:
National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB)
Target Audience:
Healthcare professionals and legal entities