№ files_lp_3_process_9_47115
File format: docx
Character count: 3244
File size: 16 KB
Classroom instructional and evaluative document outlining preparation tasks, thematic analysis, historical research expectations, structured discussion participation, reflective post-discussion writing, and a performance rubric for a literature discussion on In the Time of the Butterflies.
Title:
ITTOTB Graded Discussion
Type of Document:
Classroom discussion preparation guide and assessment rubric
Academic Level:
Secondary education literature course
Related Work:
In the Time of the Butterflies
Themes:
Power, safety, poverty, courage, fear, loyalty, family, independence, revolution, female empowerment
Activities:
Analytical question development, textual evidence identification, historical research, discussion participation, reflective writing
Assessment Method:
Performance rubric with scoring scale 5–1
Source Referenced:
They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing With Readings
Authors Referenced:
Gerald Graff; Cathy Birkenstein; Russel Durst
Publisher Referenced:
W.W. Norton and Company
Publication Year Referenced:
2012
Participation Requirements:
Active engagement, textual citation, peer response, attentive behavior
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Asphalt surfacing, construction specifications
Document type:
Technical specification
Institution:
Department of Transport
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Contractors, engineers, construction professionals
Validity period:
Not specified
Approval date:
December 2018
Modification date:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Western Australia
Topic:
Road construction, asphalt specifications
Document type:
Technical specification
Authoring organization:
Main Roads Western Australia
Target audience:
Engineers, contractors, and professionals in road construction
Period of validity:
Ongoing, with updates scheduled for 2024
Approval date:
16/11/2020
Revision dates:
17/09/2024
Note:
Contextual description
Authors:
First Author; Second Author
Affiliations:
Affiliation, Department, Institute, City, State, Country
Abstract:
Yes
Keywords:
autonomous vehicle; self balancing; smart driving; smart vehicle
Thematic Areas:
Autonomous bicycles; gyroscopes; flywheel systems; computer vision; machine learning; school choice; multicultural education
Geographic Focus:
Albany, New York, United States
Research Site:
City School District of Albany
Document Type:
Academic research paper
Methodology:
Case study
References:
Ajzen (1985); Barnea (1998); Lareau (2014); Sattin-Bajaj & Roda (2018); Billingham & Hunt (2016); Johnson & Nazaryan (2019); Logan et al. (2012); Schneider et al. (2000); Billingham (2017); Holme (2002); Billingham & Kimelberg (2013); Goldring & Rowley (2006); Lankford & Wyckoff (1992); Cucchiara (2013a, 2013b); Posey-Maddox (2016); Posey-Maddox et al. (2014; 2016); Stillman (2012); Posey (2012); Reay et al. (2011); Roda (2018); Cucchiara & Horvat (2014)
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Australia
Topic:
Asphalt Pavement, Materials Standards
Document Type:
Specification
Agency:
Department of Transport and Planning
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Construction professionals, pavement engineers
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
20 July 2023
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Organization:
Missouri State High School Activities Association
Program:
MSHSAA Prescribed Graded Music List (PGML)
Review Cycle:
Three-Year Rotation (2023–2025)
Submission Deadline:
June 1
Submission Categories:
New Music Submissions; Timing Consideration; Removal of a Selection
Literature Areas:
Winds/Percussion/Piano; Vocal; String; Brass Solos and Small Ensembles
Required Forms:
Literature Addition Request Form; Timing Clarification Form; Literature Petition Form – Removal of a Selection
Submission Requirements:
Photocopy of score or soloist part with numbered measures; completed form for each title; no originals accepted
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 1328, Columbia, MO 65205-1328
Contact Person:
Davine Davis
Non-Discrimination Policy:
No discrimination based on race, color, national origin, sex, disability, or age
Year:
2026
Subject:
Physics
Document Type:
Assignment
Institution:
School
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Communication, Ethics, Resume Writing
Document Type:
Graded Assignment
Target Audience:
Students in Communication Course
Period of Validity:
Fall Semester 2023
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Accounting, Finance
Document Type:
Educational Material
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Teachers and students in accounting
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Qualification:
HN Administration and Information Technology
Unit:
Graded Unit 1
Unit Code:
HH9M 34
Subject Area:
Administration and Information Technology
Assessment System:
SOLAR
Awarding Body:
Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA)
SCQF Levels:
2–9
Assessment Types:
Summative and Formative e-assessments
Delivery Mode:
Online (including offline secure options)
Marking Features:
Automatic marking, annotation symbols, concurrent marker access
Maximum Marking Retention Period:
9 months
Technical Requirements:
Adobe Flash Player version 12 minimum
Candidate Registration:
Bulk upload facility available
Certification Process:
Results must be separately submitted to SQA
Document Type:
Graded assignment
Format:
Laboratory report worksheet
Subject:
Science
Topic:
Ocean water density and temperature
Total Score:
15 points
Assessment Components:
Four questions with point values
Solutions Examined:
Freshwater, Salty Water, Saturated Water
Data Collection:
Temperature measurements at 0, 5, 10, and 30 minutes
Required Elements:
Hypothesis, data tables, temperature comparison, experimental summary, application to ocean conditions
Intended Audience:
Students
Submission Requirement:
Submission to teacher by due date
Year:
2026
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Asphalt Binder Testing
Document Type:
Data Sheet
Organization:
AASHTO re:source
Target Audience:
Laboratories performing asphalt binder testing
Approval Date:
January 15th, 2026
Description:
Proficiency sample data sheet for performance graded asphalt binder testing, outlining required tests and methods.
Year:
2016
Region / City:
Online
Topic:
Software development project
Document Type:
Grading rubric
Author:
Unspecified
Target Audience:
Students
Duration:
Summer 2016
Approval Date:
Unspecified
Modification Date:
Unspecified
Year:
October 2023
Region / City:
Northallerton
Topic:
Project Management, Career Development
Document Type:
Job Description
Organization:
NYC (North Yorkshire Council)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Potential job applicants
Period of Validity:
Until further notice
Approval Date:
October 2023
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Type of document:
Evaluation rubric
Framework:
High-Leverage Practices
Primary focus:
HLP 7
Embedded practices:
HLP 8, HLP 9, HLP 13, HLP 14, HLP 15, HLP 17, HLP 18, HLP 19, HLP 21
Educational context:
Inclusive and special education
Performance levels:
Ineffective, Approaching Effective, Effective, Highly Effective
Key dimensions:
Expectations, Organization, Teacher Tone, Structure, Student Characteristics, Teacher Feedback
Target population:
Students with disabilities
Referenced organizations:
Council for Exceptional Children; CEEDAR Center; GMU TTAC Region 4
Referenced years:
2019–2024
Geographic reference:
United States
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Tennessee
Subject:
Education, Emergency Remote Learning
Document Type:
Template, Guidance
Organization:
Tennessee Department of Education
Author:
Tennessee Department of Education
Target Audience:
Local Education Agencies, Public Charter Schools
Effective Period:
2020-2021 school year
Approval Date:
June 26, 2020
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Arlington, VA
Topic:
Education, High-Leverage Practices, Special Education
Document Type:
Self-Assessment Tool
Organization / Institution:
Council for Exceptional Children, CEEDAR Center
Author:
T. C. Aceves, M. J. Kennedy
Target Audience:
Educators, Educational Professionals
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
February 2024
Date of Changes:
None
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Arlington, VA
Theme:
High-leverage practices for students with disabilities
Document type:
Self-assessment tool
Organization / Institution:
Council for Exceptional Children, CEEDAR Center
Author:
T. C. Aceves, M. J. Kennedy, A. I. Hashey, T. L. Kaczorowski, D. M. DiCesare, J. McLeskey
Target audience:
Educators, specialists in special education
Period of validity:
2024
Approval date:
February 2024
Modification date:
February 2024
Year:
2026
Institution:
Villanova University Office for Residence Life
Document Type:
Evaluation Rubric
Target Audience:
Resident Assistants and Staff Supervisors
Components:
Administrative Responsibilities, Community Development, Communication, Paperwork, Timeliness, CB Planning and Execution, CB Proposals and Reports
Date of Issue:
2026