№ files_lp_4_process_2_75678
File format: docx
Character count: 917
File size: 15 KB
Guide for readers on how to annotate and analyze non-fiction texts by recognizing contrasts, extreme language, numerical data, quoted material, and unfamiliar words.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Reading comprehension and textual analysis
Document Type:
Instructional guide
Institution / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students and readers analyzing non-fiction texts
Content Focus:
Identifying contrasts, extreme language, statistics, quotes, and unknown words in non-fiction reading
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Note:
Year
Subject:
Legal Claim
Document Type:
Legal Form
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, Claimants
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Theme:
Competition
Document Type:
Rules
Target Audience:
Children aged 5-12 years
Period of Action:
November 2023
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Context
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
West Virginia, District V
Type of Document:
Educational guidelines and evaluation rubric
Audience:
Students, teachers, judges
Categories:
Fiction (Realistic, Historical, Fantasy/Fairy Tale, Science Fiction, Adventure, Mystery, Author, Book Series), Non-Fiction (Biography/Autobiography, Informational)
Project Types:
Individual, Pair, Class
Divisions:
B = grades K-2, I = grades 3-5, II = grades 6-8, III = grades 9-12
Evaluation Criteria:
Writing, Creativity, Quality of Project, Thoroughness of Written Information, Interest Evoked, Oral Presentation
Scoring:
Points assigned per category totaling 100
Publisher / Organization:
West Virginia Reading Association
Year:
1930s
Region / city:
Spain
Subject:
Spanish Civil War, Journalism, Propaganda
Document Type:
Article
Author:
George Orwell, William Howard Russell
Target Audience:
General public, historians, political analysts
Period of validity:
1930s
Date of approval:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Subject:
Comic creation based on non-fiction narratives
Document Type:
Assessment rubric
Educational Use:
Classroom evaluation guideline
Assessment Criteria:
Scene representation; Captions; Character development; Landscape and props; Non-fiction to fiction adaptation; Spelling, punctuation and grammar
Grading Levels:
Four performance levels from complete achievement to insufficient performance
Educational Context:
Student comic strip assignment
Source Reference:
“Rubric for Comic Strip Reports” from ReadWriteThink.org
Source Organization:
ReadWriteThink
Source URL:
http://www.readwritethink.org/files/resources/lesson_images/lesson195/comic-strip-rubric.pdf
Year:
2014
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Non-Fiction Narrative Novel Analysis
Document Type:
Educational Assignment / Quiz
Institution:
School / Classroom Setting
Audience:
Students
Task Date:
Wednesday, December 3, 2014
Components:
Presentation Slides, Student Evaluation, Student Reflection
Grading Criteria:
Rubric with points from 1 to 5 based on comprehension and connections
Submission Format:
Google Docs (PowerPoint style)
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Madrid
Topic:
Non-chronological reports
Document Type:
Educational Material
Institution:
BBC
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Action:
2020
Approval Date:
30th June 2020
Year:
Not specified
Subject Area:
Gender studies; media analysis; education
Type of Document:
Academic writing assignment
Educational Level:
Secondary education / upper secondary English
Assignment Type:
Analytical essay
Word Count Requirement:
900–1200 words
Primary Source Text:
Bibi van der Zee, “A feminist’s guide to raising boys”, The Guardian, 2019
Additional Source:
“Boys and Girls on Stereotypes”, YouTube video, 2018
Required Focus:
Analysis of audience engagement and stylistic analysis of lines 58–73
Skills Assessed:
Textual analysis; argumentation; use of references; discussion of gender and child-rearing
Referenced Author:
Bibi van der Zee
Publication Source of Article:
The Guardian website
Topic:
The role of gender in raising children and media discussion of gender stereotypes
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject Area:
Non-Fiction Writing / Article Summaries
Document Type:
Assessment Criteria and Checklist
Institution:
Educational / Academic Setting
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students
Assessment Scale:
1 - Rookie, 2 - Developing, 3 - On Target, 4 - Professional
Skills Evaluated:
Comprehension of central idea, organization of information, use of transitions, writing conventions
Purpose:
Guide students in summarizing non-fiction articles accurately and coherently
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Virginia, USA
Topic:
Genome Annotation
Document Type:
Cover Sheet
Organization / Institution:
Virginia Western Community College
Author:
Heather Lindberg
Target Audience:
QC reviewers, students
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Montclair, NJ
Subject:
Genomics, Phage Research
Document Type:
Submission Form
Institution:
Montclair State University
Author:
Kirsten Monsen-Collar
Target Audience:
Researchers, QC reviewers, Phage annotation teams
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Genome annotation, Actinobacteriophage
Document Type:
Cover Sheet
Organization / Institution:
CCSNH-NHTI
Author:
Joseph Christiansen, Beth Wilkes
Target Audience:
QC reviewers, annotators
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Phage genome annotation
Document type:
Submission cover sheet
Organization:
Nova Southeastern University
Author:
Ashley Janke
Target Audience:
QC reviewers, phage researchers
Date of submission:
Not specified
Date of modification:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Phage genome annotation
Document Type:
Cover sheet
Organization / Institution:
Virginia Western Community College
Author:
Heather Lindberg
Target Audience:
QC reviewer
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Coastal Georgia
Topic:
Phage Genome Annotation
Document Type:
Cover Sheet
Organization / Institution:
College of Coastal Georgia
Author:
Holly Nance
Target Audience:
QC reviewers, researchers in genomics
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Phage Name:
Schism
Author:
Justin Anderson
Institution:
Southeastern Louisiana University
Email:
[email protected]
Additional Emails:
[email protected]
Document Type:
Genome annotation submission cover sheet
Target Audience:
QC reviewers and instructors
Content:
Description of annotation process, gene issues, and validation checks
Gene Highlights:
Gene at stop 31170, Gene at stop 35089
File Type Submitted:
Spreadsheet
Protocols Followed:
tRNA annotation, frameshift annotation, Feature Table documentation
Validation Checklist:
DNA Master validation, LocusTag sequence, Feature_Type correctness, Product field verification
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Amherst, Massachusetts
Topic:
Genome Annotation
Document Type:
Cover Sheet
Organization / Institution:
UMass Amherst
Author:
Jessica Rocheleau
Target Audience:
QC reviewers
Period of Validity:
N/A
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Phage name:
Sorpresa
Document type:
Genome annotation submission cover sheet
Scientific field:
Actinobacteriophage genomics
Institution:
Brigham Young University
Author:
Jayden S. Longhurst
Contributor roles:
Student annotator
Quality control context:
SEA-PHAGES genome annotation review
Genes highlighted for review:
ORF 90, ORF 68
Genome features discussed:
Orphams, transposase, synteny rearrangement
Annotation tools referenced:
DNA Master, PECAAN, Aragorn, BLAST, PhagesDB
Submission purpose:
Quality control review of genome annotation
Source type:
Academic course-related scientific documentation
Note:
Year
Author:
Tamarah Adair