№ lp_1_14968
File format: docx
Character count: 6422
File size: 1718 KB
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Evidence-based Health Care, Systematic Reviews, Critical Appraisal Tools
Document Type:
Checklist
Organization:
JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute)
Author:
Barker TH, Habibi N, Aromataris E, Stone JC, Leonardi-Bee J, Sears K, et al.
Target Audience:
Researchers, healthcare professionals, academics
Period of Validity:
2023
Approval Date:
2023
Date of Last Review:
2023
Date of Revision:
2023
Description:
A checklist for critically appraising quasi-experimental studies as part of systematic reviews.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Quasi-experimental evaluation, research proposal
Document Type:
Application form
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Organizations or individuals applying for quasi-experimental design evaluations
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2014–2023
Region / Cities:
Antwerp, Brussels, Ghent, and 17 other Belgian cities
Topic:
Air quality, public health, socio-economic disparities
Document type:
Research study / Scientific article
Institutions:
Independent Health Insurance Funds, Health and Environment Alliance, VITO Health, KU Leuven
Authors:
Luk Bruyneel, Ludo Vandenthoren, Christian Horemans, Anne Stauffer, Bianca Cox, Tim Nawrot
Study design:
Quasi-experimental, comparative analysis of LEZ and non-LEZ cities
Population:
420,007 individuals registered in Independent Health Insurance Funds
Air pollutants studied:
PM2.5, PM10, black carbon (BC), nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
Health outcomes measured:
Long-term medication use for diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obstructive airway diseases, antidepressants
Data sources:
ATMO-Street air quality model, administrative health databases
Funding:
Bloomberg Philanthropies
Methodology:
Comparison of cities with LEZs and control cities, using high-resolution air quality data and health administrative records
Spatial analysis:
Residential exposure within LEZ, adjacent areas, and control cities
Temporal coverage:
2014–2023 for health data, 2016–2022 for air quality maps
Year:
2026
Country:
Republic of Korea
Institution:
The Catholic University of Korea; Hallym University
Authors:
A Ra Cho, Sun Huh
Publication type:
Research article
Study design:
Non-equivalent control group pre-and post-test; Non-equivalent control group pre-and post-test non-synchronized; Non-equivalent control group post-test only; Single group pre-and post-test; Time-series
Subjects:
Human participants, Korean medical students
Ethics approval:
Institutional Review Board approval required
Word count abstract:
250
Word count main text:
2,500
Number of references:
15
Number of tables and figures:
10
Keywords:
Cohort studies; Educational measurement; Program evaluation; Republic of Korea; Research design
Data collection period:
Not specified
Statistical methods:
Described per study design requirements
Year:
Not specified
Country:
China
Institution:
Hunan University
Authors:
Lyu Wang; Xiangling Wang
Affiliations:
Hunan University; Changsha University of Science and Technology
Academic field:
Translation Studies
Research topic:
Post-editing training and virtual learning environments
Keywords:
Virtual community of practice (VCoP); post-editing training; online learning; mixed-method; quasi-experimental study
Type of document:
Academic research article
Research method:
Mixed-method quasi-experimental study
Sample:
30 first-year translation postgraduate students
Experimental design:
Control group with virtual course and face-to-face course
Educational context:
Translator and post-editor training
Course format compared:
Virtual community of practice method vs face-to-face classroom instruction
Focus of analysis:
Self-reflection, self-assessment, and post-editing quality in student performance
Technological context:
Online learning platforms and network-based collaboration
Target group:
Translation postgraduate students
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Adelaide, South Australia
Topic:
Systematic Review, Critical Appraisal, Evidence-Based Healthcare
Document Type:
Guideline
Organization / Institution:
JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute)
Authors:
McArthur A, Klugarova J, Yan H, Florescu S
Target Audience:
Healthcare Professionals, Researchers, Policy Developers
Period of Validity:
N/A
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Note:
Year
Organization:
JBI
Institution:
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide
Country:
Australia
Field:
evidence-based healthcare
Document type:
critical appraisal checklist and methodological guidance
Scope:
case series studies
Context of use:
JBI Systematic Reviews
Authors:
Munn Z; Barker T; Moola S; Tufanaru C; Stern C; McArthur A; Stephenson M; Aromataris E
Source journal:
JBI Evidence Synthesis
DOI:
10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00099
Intended audience:
healthcare researchers and systematic reviewers
Source type:
methodological guidance document
Methodological focus:
assessment of bias, reporting quality, and statistical analysis
Peer review status:
approved by the JBI Scientific Committee
Year:
2020
Region / City:
South Australia
Topic:
Systematic reviews, Critical appraisal, Cohort studies
Document Type:
Research methodology tool
Organization / Institution:
JBI (University of Adelaide)
Author:
Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, Currie M, Qureshi R, Mattis P, Lisy K, Mu P-F
Target Audience:
Researchers, healthcare practitioners, systematic review reviewers
Period of Application:
2020 onwards
Approval Date:
2020
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Organization:
Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)
Document type:
Critical appraisal tool / checklist
Topic:
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
Target audience:
Researchers conducting systematic reviews
Year:
2020
Source:
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis
Format:
Checklist for individual participants in parallel group RCTs
Purpose:
Assess methodological quality and risk of bias in RCTs
Reference:
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L. Chapter 3: Systematic reviews of effectiveness
Year:
2015
Region / city:
South Australia, Adelaide
Subject:
Evidence-based healthcare, Systematic reviews, Critical appraisal
Document type:
Checklist
Organization / institution:
JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute)
Author:
McArthur A, Klugarova J, Yan H, Florescu S
Target audience:
Researchers, healthcare professionals, systematic reviewers
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of revisions:
N/A
Organization:
JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute)
Institutional affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide
Country:
Australia
Document type:
Critical appraisal checklist
Source series:
JBI Critical Appraisal Tools
Intended use:
Systematic reviews and evidence synthesis
Study design addressed:
Case control studies
Review methodology:
Evidence-based healthcare
Authors cited:
Moola S; Munn Z; Tufanaru C; Aromataris E; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Lisy K; Mu P-F
Referenced publication:
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis
Publication year:
2020
Assessment criteria:
Bias, confounding, exposure measurement, statistical analysis
Response options:
Yes; No; Unclear; Not applicable
Source type:
Methodological guidance document
Year:
2020
Region / City:
South Australia
Topic:
Systematic Reviews, Critical Appraisal, Healthcare Research
Document Type:
Research Guideline
Institution:
University of Adelaide, JBI
Author:
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L
Target Audience:
Researchers, Healthcare Professionals
Period of Application:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2015
Region / city:
Adelaide
Topic:
Evidence-based healthcare, systematic reviews, critical appraisal tools
Document type:
Research methodology
Institution:
The Joanna Briggs Institute
Author:
Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey C, Holly C, Kahlil H, Tungpunkom P
Target audience:
Healthcare professionals, researchers
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of last change:
N/A
Year:
2017
Region / city:
Adelaide, Australia
Topic:
Evidence-based healthcare, critical appraisal, systematic reviews
Document type:
Checklist
Organization:
The Joanna Briggs Institute
Author:
Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, Currie M, Qureshi R, Mattis P, Lisy K, Mu P-F
Target audience:
Researchers, healthcare professionals
Effective period:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Modification date:
N/A
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Adelaide, Australia
Topic:
Evidence-based healthcare, systematic reviews
Document type:
Checklist
Organization:
The Joanna Briggs Institute
Author:
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L
Target audience:
Healthcare professionals, researchers
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Date of approval:
2017
Date of last revision:
N/A
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Laos
Theme:
COVID-19 response, business recovery, trade facilitation, private sector support
Document Type:
Environmental and Social Action Plan (ESAP)
Organization:
Ministry of Industry and Commerce (MoIC)
Author:
World Bank
Target Audience:
Government, private sector, stakeholders involved in business development and trade
Period of Implementation:
2021-2023
Approval Date:
April 19, 2021
Date of Revisions:
Ongoing (as required)
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Bass Strait, Victoria
Topic:
Carbon Capture and Storage, Environmental Management
Document Type:
Environmental Plan, Project Update
Organization / Institution:
CarbonNet, AGR (Australia) Pty Ltd, NOPSEMA
Author:
CarbonNet Project Team
Target Audience:
Stakeholders, Local Community, Environmental Regulators
Period of Validity:
November 2019 - Ongoing
Approval Date:
April 2019
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2019
Region / city:
Serbia
Theme:
Labor Management, Project Implementation
Document Type:
Project Report
Organization / Institution:
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management (MAFWM), World Bank
Author:
World Bank, MAFWM
Target Audience:
Government officials, project managers, contractors, workers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
October 12, 2019
Amendment Date:
Not specified