№ lp_2_3_56032
File format: docx
Character count: 3432
File size: 97 KB
Application for quasi-experimental design evaluations outlining the scope, methodology, and requirements for submitting a proposal.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Quasi-experimental evaluation, research proposal
Document Type:
Application form
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Organizations or individuals applying for quasi-experimental design evaluations
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Evidence-based Health Care, Systematic Reviews, Critical Appraisal Tools
Document Type:
Checklist
Organization:
JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute)
Author:
Barker TH, Habibi N, Aromataris E, Stone JC, Leonardi-Bee J, Sears K, et al.
Target Audience:
Researchers, healthcare professionals, academics
Period of Validity:
2023
Approval Date:
2023
Date of Last Review:
2023
Date of Revision:
2023
Description:
A checklist for critically appraising quasi-experimental studies as part of systematic reviews.
Year:
2014–2023
Region / Cities:
Antwerp, Brussels, Ghent, and 17 other Belgian cities
Topic:
Air quality, public health, socio-economic disparities
Document type:
Research study / Scientific article
Institutions:
Independent Health Insurance Funds, Health and Environment Alliance, VITO Health, KU Leuven
Authors:
Luk Bruyneel, Ludo Vandenthoren, Christian Horemans, Anne Stauffer, Bianca Cox, Tim Nawrot
Study design:
Quasi-experimental, comparative analysis of LEZ and non-LEZ cities
Population:
420,007 individuals registered in Independent Health Insurance Funds
Air pollutants studied:
PM2.5, PM10, black carbon (BC), nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
Health outcomes measured:
Long-term medication use for diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obstructive airway diseases, antidepressants
Data sources:
ATMO-Street air quality model, administrative health databases
Funding:
Bloomberg Philanthropies
Methodology:
Comparison of cities with LEZs and control cities, using high-resolution air quality data and health administrative records
Spatial analysis:
Residential exposure within LEZ, adjacent areas, and control cities
Temporal coverage:
2014–2023 for health data, 2016–2022 for air quality maps
Year:
2026
Country:
Republic of Korea
Institution:
The Catholic University of Korea; Hallym University
Authors:
A Ra Cho, Sun Huh
Publication type:
Research article
Study design:
Non-equivalent control group pre-and post-test; Non-equivalent control group pre-and post-test non-synchronized; Non-equivalent control group post-test only; Single group pre-and post-test; Time-series
Subjects:
Human participants, Korean medical students
Ethics approval:
Institutional Review Board approval required
Word count abstract:
250
Word count main text:
2,500
Number of references:
15
Number of tables and figures:
10
Keywords:
Cohort studies; Educational measurement; Program evaluation; Republic of Korea; Research design
Data collection period:
Not specified
Statistical methods:
Described per study design requirements
Year:
Not specified
Country:
China
Institution:
Hunan University
Authors:
Lyu Wang; Xiangling Wang
Affiliations:
Hunan University; Changsha University of Science and Technology
Academic field:
Translation Studies
Research topic:
Post-editing training and virtual learning environments
Keywords:
Virtual community of practice (VCoP); post-editing training; online learning; mixed-method; quasi-experimental study
Type of document:
Academic research article
Research method:
Mixed-method quasi-experimental study
Sample:
30 first-year translation postgraduate students
Experimental design:
Control group with virtual course and face-to-face course
Educational context:
Translator and post-editor training
Course format compared:
Virtual community of practice method vs face-to-face classroom instruction
Focus of analysis:
Self-reflection, self-assessment, and post-editing quality in student performance
Technological context:
Online learning platforms and network-based collaboration
Target group:
Translation postgraduate students
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Environmental and Social Impact in Evaluations
Document Type:
Consultancy Request
Organization / Institution:
United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG), Global Environment Facility (GEF)
Author:
UNEG Working Group on Climate Change and Environment
Target Audience:
Consultants, UNEG members, Evaluation Practitioners
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
Training Evaluation
Document type:
Template
Institution:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Author:
CDC Training and Evaluation Team
Target Audience:
Training developers, evaluators, and learners
Duration:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
North Dakota, USA
Topic:
Promotion and Tenure Evaluation Guidelines
Document Type:
Policy Guidelines
Institution:
North Dakota State University, College of Engineering
Author:
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Target Audience:
Faculty Members, Academic Committees
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Revisions:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
Visual Impairment, Assessment, Psychological Evaluation
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / institution:
American Printing House
Author:
Jennifer Aileen Engle, May Thien Nguyen, Stephen A. Goodman, Carol Evans, Marnee Loftin
Target audience:
Professionals in psychology, occupational therapy, speech-language pathology
Period of action:
Not specified
Date of approval:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / city:
Washington, DC
Subject:
Pesticide evaluation, neonicotinoids, environmental effects
Document type:
Response to public comments
Organization:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Author:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Target audience:
Stakeholders, regulatory bodies, environmental organizations, public
Period of validity:
Indefinite
Approval date:
June 2022
Date of changes:
None specified
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Stafford, VA
Subject:
Annual Workplace Evaluations
Document Type:
Request for Information (RFI)
Agency:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Author:
Antionette Collins-Somerville
Target Audience:
Contractors, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses, Veteran-Owned Small Businesses
Contracting Office:
National Cemetery Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs
Period of Action:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Court Order
Organization / Institution:
DBHDD
Note:
Year
Reference:
HM/QP/003
Type of document:
Regulatory evaluation template
Scope:
Finished Pharmaceutical Products (FPP) and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API)
Regulatory body:
ZAMRA (Zambia Medicines Regulatory Authority)
Content focus:
Quality, labelling, manufacturing, and stability assessment
Submission date:
As indicated per application
Evaluators:
As assigned in document
Application number:
As specified in submissions
ATC code / Pharmacological classification:
Provided per product
Dosage form:
Specified per product
Route of administration:
Specified per product
Applicant:
Name and address provided per submission
Manufacturing site:
Name and address of FPP and API manufacturers
GMP compliance:
Status indicated per site
Reference standards:
CEP, DMF, pharmacopeial monographs cited
Evaluation sections:
Summary of Product Information, Quality Evaluation of Labelling and Samples, Drug Substance details, Manufacturing process, Analytical procedures, Stability data
Jurisdiction:
California
Subject area:
Medical-legal psychiatric evaluations
Document type:
Quality assurance checklist and reference guide
Legal context:
Workers’ Compensation
Applicable professionals:
QMEs, AMEs, IMEs, PTPs
Governing regulations:
California Code of Regulations §§35.5, 40; Labor Code §3208.3
Issuing context:
Division of Workers’ Compensation
Authors:
Steven D. Feinberg, MD; Nicole L. Richardson, Esq.; Robert G. Rassp; Saul Allweiss; Vladimir Bokarius, MD, PhD; Joshua Kirz, PhD; Bobbie McDonald, PsyD; David E. Sones, MD; Julius Young
Geographic scope:
California
Intended use:
Medical-legal reporting in workers’ compensation cases
Source type:
Professional guideline and checklist
Year:
2026
Organization:
NAIC Innovation, Cybersecurity and Technology (H) Committee
Type of document:
Regulatory guidance / Supplementary tool
Audience:
State insurance regulators
Topics:
Artificial intelligence, machine learning, insurance risk assessment, consumer protection
Sections:
Exhibit A – Quantify Regulated Entity’s Use of AI Systems; Exhibit B – AI Systems Governance Risk Assessment Framework; Exhibit C – AI Systems High-Risk Model Details; Exhibit D – AI Systems Model Data Details
Scope:
Financial and consumer risk evaluation of AI systems usage in insurance companies
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Artificial Intelligence, Insurance, Risk Management
Document Type:
Regulatory Tool
Institution:
National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
Author:
Big Data and AI Working Group (BDAIWG)
Target Audience:
State Regulators, Insurance Companies
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Access keys, staff management, MDS evaluations
Document type:
Guideline
Organization:
Riverside Insights
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Staff involved in MDS evaluations
Period of validity:
Through December 31, 2027
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Idaho
Topic:
Transportation, Software Development
Document Type:
Research Proposal
Institution:
Idaho Transportation Department
Author:
Idaho Transportation Department
Target Audience:
Contractors, Software Developers, Research Program Stakeholders
Period of Validity:
Until completion of project
Approval Date:
February 26, 2021
Date of Modifications:
N/A
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Mumbai
Theme:
Personal Accident Insurance, Medical Expenses, Road Accident
Document Type:
Proposal Form
Organization / Institution:
The New India Assurance Company Limited
Target Audience:
Individuals, small groups under 51 members