№ lp_1_2_49598
File format: docx
Character count: 5467
File size: 682 KB
The document is a checklist for critical appraisal of text and opinion papers in systematic reviews, developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute for use in evidence synthesis.
Year:
2015
Region / city:
South Australia, Adelaide
Subject:
Evidence-based healthcare, Systematic reviews, Critical appraisal
Document type:
Checklist
Organization / institution:
JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute)
Author:
McArthur A, Klugarova J, Yan H, Florescu S
Target audience:
Researchers, healthcare professionals, systematic reviewers
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of revisions:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Evidence-based Health Care, Systematic Reviews, Critical Appraisal Tools
Document Type:
Checklist
Organization:
JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute)
Author:
Barker TH, Habibi N, Aromataris E, Stone JC, Leonardi-Bee J, Sears K, et al.
Target Audience:
Researchers, healthcare professionals, academics
Period of Validity:
2023
Approval Date:
2023
Date of Last Review:
2023
Date of Revision:
2023
Description:
A checklist for critically appraising quasi-experimental studies as part of systematic reviews.
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Adelaide, South Australia
Topic:
Systematic Review, Critical Appraisal, Evidence-Based Healthcare
Document Type:
Guideline
Organization / Institution:
JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute)
Authors:
McArthur A, Klugarova J, Yan H, Florescu S
Target Audience:
Healthcare Professionals, Researchers, Policy Developers
Period of Validity:
N/A
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Note:
Year
Organization:
JBI
Institution:
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide
Country:
Australia
Field:
evidence-based healthcare
Document type:
critical appraisal checklist and methodological guidance
Scope:
case series studies
Context of use:
JBI Systematic Reviews
Authors:
Munn Z; Barker T; Moola S; Tufanaru C; Stern C; McArthur A; Stephenson M; Aromataris E
Source journal:
JBI Evidence Synthesis
DOI:
10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00099
Intended audience:
healthcare researchers and systematic reviewers
Source type:
methodological guidance document
Methodological focus:
assessment of bias, reporting quality, and statistical analysis
Peer review status:
approved by the JBI Scientific Committee
Year:
2020
Region / City:
South Australia
Topic:
Systematic reviews, Critical appraisal, Cohort studies
Document Type:
Research methodology tool
Organization / Institution:
JBI (University of Adelaide)
Author:
Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, Currie M, Qureshi R, Mattis P, Lisy K, Mu P-F
Target Audience:
Researchers, healthcare practitioners, systematic review reviewers
Period of Application:
2020 onwards
Approval Date:
2020
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Organization:
Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)
Document type:
Critical appraisal tool / checklist
Topic:
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
Target audience:
Researchers conducting systematic reviews
Year:
2020
Source:
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis
Format:
Checklist for individual participants in parallel group RCTs
Purpose:
Assess methodological quality and risk of bias in RCTs
Reference:
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L. Chapter 3: Systematic reviews of effectiveness
Organization:
JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute)
Institutional affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide
Country:
Australia
Document type:
Critical appraisal checklist
Source series:
JBI Critical Appraisal Tools
Intended use:
Systematic reviews and evidence synthesis
Study design addressed:
Case control studies
Review methodology:
Evidence-based healthcare
Authors cited:
Moola S; Munn Z; Tufanaru C; Aromataris E; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Lisy K; Mu P-F
Referenced publication:
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis
Publication year:
2020
Assessment criteria:
Bias, confounding, exposure measurement, statistical analysis
Response options:
Yes; No; Unclear; Not applicable
Source type:
Methodological guidance document
Year:
2020
Region / City:
South Australia
Topic:
Systematic Reviews, Critical Appraisal, Healthcare Research
Document Type:
Research Guideline
Institution:
University of Adelaide, JBI
Author:
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L
Target Audience:
Researchers, Healthcare Professionals
Period of Application:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2015
Region / city:
Adelaide
Topic:
Evidence-based healthcare, systematic reviews, critical appraisal tools
Document type:
Research methodology
Institution:
The Joanna Briggs Institute
Author:
Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey C, Holly C, Kahlil H, Tungpunkom P
Target audience:
Healthcare professionals, researchers
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of last change:
N/A
Year:
2017
Region / city:
Adelaide, Australia
Topic:
Evidence-based healthcare, critical appraisal, systematic reviews
Document type:
Checklist
Organization:
The Joanna Briggs Institute
Author:
Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, Currie M, Qureshi R, Mattis P, Lisy K, Mu P-F
Target audience:
Researchers, healthcare professionals
Effective period:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Modification date:
N/A
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Adelaide, Australia
Topic:
Evidence-based healthcare, systematic reviews
Document type:
Checklist
Organization:
The Joanna Briggs Institute
Author:
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L
Target audience:
Healthcare professionals, researchers
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Date of approval:
2017
Date of last revision:
N/A
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Eastern North Carolina, Divisions 1-8
Topic:
Conservation measures for Northern Long-Eared Bat (NLEB) and Tricolored Bat (TCB)
Document Type:
Programmatic Biological Opinion
Agency / Organization:
US Fish and Wildlife Service, Federal Highway Administration, US Army Corps of Engineers, North Carolina Department of Transportation
Author:
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Target Audience:
Environmental and transportation project stakeholders
Effective Period:
2022-2030
Approval Date:
December 15, 2022
Amendments Date:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Europe
Topic:
Demographic Change
Document type:
Opinion
Organization / institution:
European Committee of the Regions (CoR)
Author:
János Ádám Karácsony
Target audience:
EU Member States, policymakers, regional authorities
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
2024-10-09
Date of amendments:
None
Teacher Candidate:
Carli Sisson
Mentor Teacher:
Dr. McDonald
School:
University of Memphis
Course:
IDT 3600
Grade Level:
5th Grade
Subject:
English Language Arts
Lesson Length:
65 minutes
Lesson Topic:
Fact and Opinion
Standards:
TN English 0501.5.1; ISTE Technology Standards
Instructional Materials:
Little Red Riding Hood; laptops; Microsoft Word
Technology Used:
Microsoft Word; student email; BrainPOP
Assessment Type:
Performance-based rubric
Document Type:
Lesson plan
Target Learners:
Elementary school students
Date:
November 19, 2014
Year:
2021
Region / City:
New Mexico
Topic:
Legal Procedures
Document Type:
Court Form
Institution:
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Author:
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Target Audience:
Self-represented litigants in civil appeals
Validity Period:
No specific dates mentioned
Approval Date:
No approval date provided
Amendment Date:
No changes mentioned
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Columbia, MO; Piscataway, NJ; West Lafayette, IN; Birmingham, AL; Reston, VA; Baltimore, MD; Loma Linda, CA; Fort Worth, TX
Topic:
Research, Quality Improvement, Pharmacy Education
Document Type:
Opinion Paper
Organization / Institution:
American College of Clinical Pharmacy
Authors:
Taylor D. Steuber, Jimmy Gonzalez, Alex N. Isaacs, Kristi W. Kelley, Sarah A. Nisly, Jennifer A. Szwak, Lisa Hong, Meredith L. Howard
Target Audience:
Pharmacy professionals, educators, and students
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Kentucky
Theme:
Environmental Impact, Conservation
Document Type:
Guideline
Agency / Institution:
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Consultants, KYTC personnel
Period of validity:
Ongoing, based on project reviews
Approval Date:
April 17, 2020
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2017
Region / city:
Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI)
Subject:
Political opinion, Human rights, Asylum
Document Type:
Country Policy and Information Note
Organization / institution:
Home Office, Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Home Office decision makers, asylum caseworkers
Period of validity:
Indefinite (for policy guidance)
Approval Date:
25 July 2017
Date of Changes:
N/A