№ files_lp_4_process_1_37479
File format: docx
Character count: 9523
File size: 152 KB
Description
Note:
Year
Theme:
Film Theory
Document Type:
Academic Article
Target Audience:
Students, Filmmakers, Film Enthusiasts
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
1995
Region / city:
Australia
Subject:
Cinema Industry, Australian Film History
Document type:
Report
Organization / institution:
Australian Theatre Historical Society
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Cinema industry professionals
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Context description:
Industry report detailing the history, recognition, and industry news for Australian cinema pioneers between 1995 and 2001.
Check List for Television, Cinema and Media Arts Majors 2019 General Education and Bard Requirements
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Kyrgyzstan
Subject:
Television, Cinema, and Media Arts
Document Type:
Curriculum Checklist
Institution:
AUCA
Author:
AUCA Academic Department
Target Audience:
Students enrolled in Television, Cinema, and Media Arts programs
Effective Period:
2019
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Total Credits:
243 credits
General Education Credits:
96 credits
Major Credits:
120-123 credits
Elective Credits:
24-27 credits
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Not specified
Theme:
Literature and Cinema
Document Type:
Curriculum Plan
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Keertika Lotni
Target Audience:
Students of Semester III, Department of English
Period of Action:
Aug-Dec 2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
4
Note:
Region / City
Field:
Cinema, Photography
Document Type:
Study Plan
Organization:
School of Communication and Media, Department of English and Media Arts
Target Audience:
Students pursuing a B.F.A. in Cinema & Photography
Organisation:
Scottish Government
Postal address:
St. Andrews House, Regent Road, Edinburgh EH1 3DG
Document type:
Application letter
Subject:
Cinema licence exemption certificate
Author:
X
Signatory:
X on behalf of X organisation
Recipient:
To whom it might concern
Operational basis:
Not-for-profit screenings
Venue:
X venue, X location
Screening frequency:
Infrequent basis
Number of screenings to date:
X (including X and X)
Fees charged:
Nominal amount to cover Single Title Screening Licence, equipment hire and associated costs
Referenced licence:
Single Title Screening Licence
Average licence cost:
£100 per title
Attachments:
Memorandum, articles of association, constitution or similar document confirming not-for-profit status
Date:
Not specified
Author:
Louis Lo
Title (Chinese):
生死愛慾看電影
Date:
3–17 October 2016
Type of document:
Lecture notes
Format:
Course outline
Subject:
Philosophy and film studies
Themes:
Happiness; Death; Aging; Love; Existentialism; Alienation
Films discussed:
That Day, on the Beach; Tokyo Story (1953); Le Notte (1961)
Philosophers referenced:
Montaigne; Cicero; Albert Camus; Hegel; Karl Marx; Sigmund Freud
Suggested readings:
Yi Yi; Sophie’s World; The Myth of Sisyphus; Why Grow Up?; 《存在主義概論》; 《生命坎陷與現象世界》
Language:
English with Chinese titles
Year:
2025
Location:
Morocco
Programme dates:
15 September – 27 October 2025
Travel dates:
14 September – 28 October 2025
Post-residency period:
November–December 2025
Submission deadline:
31 July 2025 (midnight Paris time)
Organizing institutions:
UNESCO; Tamayouz Cinema Foundation
Document type:
Candidate application form
Target group:
Young women African filmmakers
Language requirement:
English or French
Mandatory attachments:
Curriculum Vitae; video links to previous works; copy of passport
Optional attachment:
Certificate of English or French proficiency
Theme of residency:
Call centres in Morocco
Copyright provisions:
Copyrights belong to participating residents; UNESCO retains non-exclusive screening rights for non-profit purposes
Obligations of selected applicants:
Participation in residency and post-residency activities; submission of audiovisual testimonials; commitment to ethical storytelling, diversity and gender equality; confidentiality until official screening
Year:
2016
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Value Added Tax, Legal Interpretation
Document Type:
Court Ruling
Author:
European Court of Justice
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, Tax authorities, Businesses involved in VAT matters
Effective Period:
2016
Approval Date:
26 May 2016
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Contextual Description:
A legal ruling by the European Court of Justice interpreting VAT exemptions for card handling services related to cinema ticket purchases via telephone or internet.
Year:
2018
Term:
Autumn
Course code:
WGSST 4527.01
Topic:
Gender and the horror film
Institution:
The Ohio State University
Department:
Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
Instructor:
Dr. L. Mizejewski
Location:
56 University Hall
Meeting days and times:
Tuesday and Thursday, 9:40–10:50
Format:
Lecture
Course materials:
Essays and films provided via Carmen and OSU media library
Assessment:
Midterm exam, final exam, reading journals, case study, course paper
Grading scale:
A–E
Assignment deadlines:
Refer to course schedule and Carmen/Canvas pages
Office hours:
Tuesday and Thursday, 11:00–14:00, 286d University Hall
Contact:
[email protected], 614-292-2467
Audience:
Undergraduate students in gender and cinema studies
Course focus:
Feminist analysis of cinematic texts, genre studies, social context, and psycho/sexual theories
Year:
2023
Location:
Plymouth, UK
Theme:
Film Festival, Cinema, Arts
Document Type:
Event Schedule
Organizer:
Plymouth Arts Cinema
Target Audience:
General Public
Period of Activity:
July 2023
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Institution:
Elon University
Department:
Cinema & Television Arts
Document type:
Academic guidebook
Audience:
First-year students
Semester:
Fall/Spring 2026
Credits recommended:
16–18 semester hours
Required courses:
ELN 1010, COR 1100 or ENG 1100
Additional courses:
COM 1000, COM 2000, IDS 1150
Purpose:
Assisting students in course selection and schedule planning
Format:
Guidebook with worksheets and example schedules
Delivery method:
Online preorientation (Elon Bound) and virtual advising sessions
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Seattle
Topic:
Service dogs, ableism, disability justice
Document Type:
Research Article
Organization / Institution:
Seattle Pacific University, Department of Physics
Author:
Amy D. Robertson
Target Audience:
Researchers, disability advocates, public policy experts
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Investment Reporting and Project Progress
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Gates Foundation
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Grantees, Program Officers
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Transitional Housing, Domestic Violence Support
Document Type:
Application Guide
Organization:
Office on Violence Against Women (OVW)
Author:
OVW
Target Audience:
Applicants for OVW Transitional Housing Assistance Grant Program
Period of Effect:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
MM/DD/YYYY
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Environmental Impact Assessment
Document Type:
Environmental Review Checklist
Agency / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Project Managers, Environmental Consultants
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Washington University School of Medicine
Subject:
Design and Construction Documentation
Document Type:
Guideline
Organization / Institution:
Washington University
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Design Team, Facilities Maintenance Technicians, Project Managers
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
January 1, 2015
Revision Date:
May 4, 2022
Year:
2024
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Teaching effectiveness, self-reflection, course documentation
Document type:
Guide
Institution:
KU Center for Teaching Excellence
Author:
KU Center for Teaching Excellence
Target audience:
Instructors, faculty members
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
June 2024
Date of last modification:
June 2024
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Theme:
Literacy, Language Features, Narrative
Document Type:
Educational Resource
Organization / Institution:
Department of Education and Training, Victoria
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Primary educators, curriculum designers
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Office Administration, On-the-Job Training
Document Type:
Narrative Report
Organization / Institution:
Bright Solutions Consultancy
Author:
Sophia Martinez
Period of Action:
June 1, 2024 - August 31, 2024
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified