№ lp_1_16822
File format: docx
Character count: 5470
File size: 94 KB
The Basis of Design Narrative provides a structured framework for documenting the design decisions and rationale made by the Design Team throughout the course of a construction project.
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Washington University School of Medicine
Subject:
Design and Construction Documentation
Document Type:
Guideline
Organization / Institution:
Washington University
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Design Team, Facilities Maintenance Technicians, Project Managers
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
January 1, 2015
Revision Date:
May 4, 2022
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Church governance, team ministry
Document type:
Church policy
Organization:
Presbytery
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Church members, team ministry members
Effective period:
Ongoing
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Context:
This document outlines the structure, roles, and dispute resolution procedures for a Team Ministry within the Presbytery, as well as the governance framework for the team’s functioning.
Year:
2014
Region / city:
Geneva
Subject:
Assessing uniformity by off-types
Document type:
Report
Organization / institution:
International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV)
Author:
UPOV Office
Target audience:
UPOV members and experts in plant variety assessment
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Institution:
Punjab Engineering College, Chandigarh (Deemed to be University)
Type of document:
Application Form
Position:
Faculty (Assistant Professor / Associate Professor / Professor)
Duration:
3-year Contractual Basis
Sections included:
Personal Information, Academic Qualifications, Research Contributions, Employment History, Referees, Enclosures
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Ekurhuleni, South Africa
Subject:
Procurement / Supply of Water
Document Type:
Procurement Quotation
Department / Institution:
Department of Finance, Department of Community Service
Author:
Bekane Molekwa, Nomonde Mphuthi
Target Audience:
Bidders, Procurement Professionals
Period of Validity:
Until 30 June 2026 or until a tender is in place
Approval Date:
01 March 2024
Date of Amendments:
14 December 2023
Note:
Description
Effective Date:
07/10/2025
Year:
2025
Note:
Region / City
Theme:
Nuclear Safety / Inspection Procedures
Document Type:
Inspection Manual
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Target Audience:
Nuclear plant operators, NRC inspectors, licensed operators
Date of Changes:
07/10/2025
Year:
2020
Region / city:
Australia
Theme:
Sewage pumping station design
Document type:
Template
Organization:
Urban Utilities
Author:
Harald Kemmetmuller
Target audience:
Design and engineering teams, project managers
Effective period:
2020-2025
Approval date:
29/06/2020
Revision date:
28/01/2025
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspection and Performance Indicators
Document Type:
Inspection Manual
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Author:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Target Audience:
NRC Inspectors, Licensees of Nuclear Facilities
Period of validity:
From January 1, 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Hennepin County
Topic:
Mental Health, Case Management, Custody
Document Type:
Guideline
Agency:
Hennepin County
Author:
Kendra Roberg
Target Audience:
Case Managers, Mental Health Coordinators, Jail Staff
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
September 2022
Date of changes:
None
Context:
This is a guideline document for case managers working with individuals in custody, detailing procedures for case management, medication coordination, discharge planning, and visitation at Hennepin County facilities.
Year:
2018
Region / city:
Hobbs
Topic:
Air Quality, Environmental Permitting
Document Type:
Permit Application
Agency / Institution:
Lea Power Partners LLC
Author:
Kirby Olson
Target Audience:
Environmental regulators, power plant operators
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
11/21/18
Amendment Date:
November 30, 2018
Year:
[Year]
Region / city:
[City], Washington
Topic:
Fish Passage, Environmental Considerations, Project Planning
Document type:
Basis of Design
Organization / institution:
Washington State Department of Transportation
Author:
[Author Name]
Target audience:
Engineers, project planners, environmental stakeholders
Period of validity:
[Project Duration]
Approval date:
[Month Day, Year]
Modification date:
[Date]
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Pittsburgh
Subject:
Geotechnical design for tunnel and infrastructure construction
Document Type:
Technical Memorandum
Agency / Institution:
ALCOSAN
Author:
Wade Trim, Michael Baker International, McMillen Jacobs Associates
Target Audience:
Engineers, geotechnical specialists, construction planners
Period of Validity:
2020
Approval Date:
May 14, 2020
Date of Changes:
September 19, 2019
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Van, Texas
Topic:
Nondiscrimination, Disability, Housing
Document Type:
Policy
Organization / Institution:
City of Van
Target Audience:
Residents of Van, Texas
Context:
A policy outlining the nondiscrimination stance of the City of Van regarding disability, as part of its federally assisted programs and housing activities.
Note:
Year
Topic:
HVAC Systems, VRF Systems, Equipment Specifications
Document Type:
Guide Specifications
Organization / Institution:
LG
Target Audience:
Contractors, Engineers
Document code:
TOD/LC/03
Subject:
Opening of official Letter of Credit on nil margin basis
Type of document:
Government recommendation and certification form
Sector:
Public finance and procurement
Country:
Sri Lanka
Currency:
Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
Issuing authority:
Treasury Operations
Involved institutions:
Line ministries, government departments, state owned enterprises
Financial instrument:
Letter of Credit
Margin basis:
Nil (zero)
Procurement scope:
Goods and services under approved procurement
Banks involved:
Bank of Ceylon; People’s Bank
Required approvals:
Procurement Committee; Cabinet (where applicable)
Signatories:
Secretary to the Ministry; Head of Department; Director General of Treasury Operations; Chief Financial Officer
Attachments required:
Letter of Credit application; Performa Invoice; Procurement approvals; prior LC documents
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Jordan
Topic:
Energy, Power Generation
Document Type:
Request for Qualifications
Organization:
National Electric Power Company (NEPCO)
Author:
Dr. Sufian M. Al-Bataineh
Target Audience:
Qualified firms and consortia interested in power generation projects
Validity Period:
25 years (starting from the project completion)
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Seattle
Topic:
Service dogs, ableism, disability justice
Document Type:
Research Article
Organization / Institution:
Seattle Pacific University, Department of Physics
Author:
Amy D. Robertson
Target Audience:
Researchers, disability advocates, public policy experts
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Investment Reporting and Project Progress
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Gates Foundation
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Grantees, Program Officers
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Transitional Housing, Domestic Violence Support
Document Type:
Application Guide
Organization:
Office on Violence Against Women (OVW)
Author:
OVW
Target Audience:
Applicants for OVW Transitional Housing Assistance Grant Program
Period of Effect:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
MM/DD/YYYY
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Environmental Impact Assessment
Document Type:
Environmental Review Checklist
Agency / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Project Managers, Environmental Consultants
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified