№ lp_1_21631
File format: docx
Character count: 2829
File size: 869 KB
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Office Administration, On-the-Job Training
Document Type:
Narrative Report
Organization / Institution:
Bright Solutions Consultancy
Author:
Sophia Martinez
Period of Action:
June 1, 2024 - August 31, 2024
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Minnesota
Subject:
On-the-Job Training Program, Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
Document Type:
Contract
Agency / Organization:
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
Author:
TAA
Target Audience:
Employers, Trainees
Period of Validity:
From [Start Date] to [End Date]
Approval Date:
[Approval Date]
Modification Date:
[Modification Date]
Year:
2013
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Veterans Affairs, Apprenticeship and Job Training Programs
Document Type:
Supporting Statement
Author:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Target Audience:
Employers, Apprentices, Veterans, and Government Agencies
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Massachusetts
Topic:
Dental Assistant Training and Licensing
Document Type:
Resource Guide
Agency:
DPH Office of Oral Health
Target Audience:
Dental practices in Massachusetts
Note:
Year
Subject:
Calibration of Thermometers, Laboratory Procedures, ISO/IEC 17025
Document Type:
Training Worksheet
Target Audience:
Laboratory Metrologists, Trainees
Contextual description:
Training worksheet for laboratory procedures on calibrating liquid-in-glass and digital thermometers, including measurement uncertainties, control charts, and calibration standards compliance.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
USA
Subject:
Calibration, Training, Metrology
Document Type:
Training Worksheet
Institution:
NIST
Author:
NIST Office of Weights and Measures
Target Audience:
Employees, Trainees in Metrology
Validity Period:
Until completion of training
Approval Date:
2026
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Georgia
Topic:
Job Training, Apprenticeship
Document Type:
Form
Organization / Institution:
Department of Veterans Service - Georgia State Approving Agency
Author:
Department of Veterans Service
Target Audience:
Veterans, Trainees
Period of Validity:
From (mm/dd/yy) To (mm/dd/yy)
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Subject:
Aircraft Maintenance License, On-the-Job Training
Document Type:
Logbook Guidelines
Target Audience:
Personnel involved in aircraft maintenance training
Note:
Year
Theme:
Home and Community Services, Long-Term Care Worker Training
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization / Institution:
Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS)
Target Audience:
Long-term care facilities and instructors
Program:
Medical Imaging Youth Apprenticeship
Field:
Medical Imaging
Length of Apprenticeship:
One year
Total Occupational Competencies Required:
10
Evaluation Frequency:
Minimum two evaluations per year
Occupational Competencies:
Infection control and safety; Personal protective equipment; Patient care; Diagnostic area setup; Patient preparation; Radiation safety and protection; Patient positioning; Room cleaning and restocking; Inventory maintenance; Client transport
Employability Skills Assessment:
Required
Minimum Rating Requirement:
Meets Expectations (Level 2)
Evaluation Levels:
Working to Meet Expectations; Meets Expectations; Exceeds Expectations
Evaluation Participants:
Employer/Mentor; School-Based and/or YA Coordinator; Youth Apprentice
Signatures Required:
Employer/Mentor; School-Based and/or YA Coordinator; Youth Apprentice
Post-Secondary Pathway Opportunities:
Diagnostic Medical Sonography; Radiography Technician
Document Type:
Apprenticeship performance standards and competency evaluation guide
Intended Audience:
Youth apprentices; Employers/Mentors; School districts; YA coordinators
Regulatory Reference:
Annual radiation dose limit set by DHS
Note:
Year
Target Audience:
Employers, business owners
Year:
2023
Region:
West Central Missouri
Document Type:
Policy
Governing Body:
Workforce Development Board of Western Missouri, Inc.
Author:
Office of Workforce Development (OWD)
Target Audience:
WIOA customers (Adult, Dislocated Workers, Youth ages 18-24)
Related Policies:
OWD Issuance 07-2023, Change 1; OWD Issuance 13-2021
Program Type:
On-the-Job Training (OJT)
Minimum Wage:
$1.00 above state minimum wage for the West Central Region
Maximum OJT Employees per Company:
40% of total workforce
Reimbursement Rates:
Up to 75% standard, up to 90% for businesses with 50 or fewer employees
Apprenticeship Integration:
Supported through combined ITAs and OJT
Nepotism Policy:
Prohibits supervision or hiring by relatives
Dispute Resolution:
Requires informal grievance process before termination
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Seattle
Topic:
Service dogs, ableism, disability justice
Document Type:
Research Article
Organization / Institution:
Seattle Pacific University, Department of Physics
Author:
Amy D. Robertson
Target Audience:
Researchers, disability advocates, public policy experts
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Investment Reporting and Project Progress
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Gates Foundation
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Grantees, Program Officers
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Transitional Housing, Domestic Violence Support
Document Type:
Application Guide
Organization:
Office on Violence Against Women (OVW)
Author:
OVW
Target Audience:
Applicants for OVW Transitional Housing Assistance Grant Program
Period of Effect:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
MM/DD/YYYY
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Environmental Impact Assessment
Document Type:
Environmental Review Checklist
Agency / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Project Managers, Environmental Consultants
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified