№ files_lp_3_process_7_057134
File format: docx
Character count: 1081
File size: 29 KB
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Academic assessment
Document type:
Form
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Students
Period of validity:
Not specified
Date of approval:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Context description:
A form used by students to request a re-mark of academic work that was not included in the moderation sample after discussing feedback with the initial marker.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
N/A
Subject:
Education / Higher Education
Document Type:
Checklist
Organization:
Gateway Qualifications
Author:
A2HE Team
Target Audience:
Centres offering Gateway Qualifications Access to HE diplomas
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Sheffield
Topic:
Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND), Education
Document Type:
Guidance Document
Institution:
Local Authority, Sheffield
Author:
Sheffield Inclusion Task Force
Target Audience:
Schools, Practitioners, Families, Young People
Period of validity:
2025 onwards
Approval Date:
February 2025
Date of amendments:
January 2025
Contextual description:
Guidance document outlining the Sheffield Support Grid Exemplification for identifying and supporting pupils with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities in primary and secondary schools.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
New Zealand
Subject:
Education / Assessment
Document Type:
Internal Moderation Checklist
Institution:
Schools
Author:
NZQA
Target Audience:
Teachers / Educators
Period of validity:
Annual
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
New Zealand
Topic:
Education, Assessment, Moderation
Document Type:
Policy
Organization:
NZQA
Author:
New Zealand Qualifications Authority
Target Audience:
Tertiary education organisations, schools
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
dd Month yyyy
Revision Date:
dd Month yyyy
Next Review Date:
xx dd Month yyyy
Year:
2023
Region / City:
New Zealand
Subject:
Digital file submission for moderation
Document Type:
FAQ
Organ / Institution:
New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA)
Author:
NZQA
Target Audience:
Moderators, educators, and administrators involved in external moderation
Period of Application:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Context:
A FAQ document for NZQA External Moderation Application, providing guidance on submitting digital files for moderation, including accepted file types, sizes, and storage solutions.
Note:
Year
Contextual description:
An official overview detailing the moderation procedures for Stage 2 assessment in the SACE system, including moderation principles, assumptions, and the final moderation process.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
South Africa
Topic:
Moderation of outcomes-based assessments
Document Type:
Learner Guide
Organ / Institution:
South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Moderators and assessors in education and training
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Jordan
Topic:
Psychosocial status, hearing loss, mothers, social support, psychological burden
Document Type:
Research Study
Institution:
Jordan Ministry of Health
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Researchers, healthcare professionals, caregivers
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Topic:
Ethane oxychlorination, ethylene epoxidation, catalyst testing
Document type:
Research article
Organization / institution:
University of Minnesota, Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science
Author:
James W. Harris, Aditya Bhan
Target audience:
Researchers, chemical engineers
Date of approval:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual description
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Phonics, SEND, Teacher Assessment, School Attendance
Document Type:
Progress Report
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
School staff, teachers
Period of Action:
End of academic year
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2024
Country:
Canada
Study Type:
Phase II clinical trial
Treatment Regimen:
Bendamustine-Rituximab combination with concurrent Acalabrutinib
Participants:
62
Centers:
9
Primary Endpoint:
Combined Complete and Very Good Partial Response (CR+VGPR) rates
Secondary Endpoints:
Best overall response (BoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DoR), Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
Median Age:
69
Mutation Analysis:
MYD88 89.3%, CXCR4 28.6%, TP53 1.8%
Adverse Events:
Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in 53 participants, 42 Grade 3/4 during combination therapy, 15 Grade 3/4 during monotherapy
Follow-up:
Median 350 days
Data Cut-off:
June 5, 2024
Document Type:
Clinical trial report
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Australia
Topic:
Oncology, Pharmaceuticals
Document Type:
Resubmission
Institution:
Australian Government, Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee
Author:
AstraZeneca Pty Ltd.
Target Audience:
Healthcare professionals, regulatory bodies
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
November 2021
Date of Changes:
November 2021
Year:
2018
Type of Document:
Guidance notes
Target Audience:
Principal Investigators, Research Ethics Board members
Regulations Referenced:
Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS 2), ICH Good Clinical Practice (E6)
Scope:
Research involving human participants, including clinical trials
Approval Authority:
Research Ethics Board (REB)
Submission Requirements:
Electronic submission of amendments, updated consent forms, and relevant documentation
Review Process:
Expedited Review, Full Board Review
Conflict of Interest:
Required declaration for new Principal Investigators
Amendments Covered:
Protocol changes, investigator changes, funding agency changes, study title changes, risk updates
Year:
2024
Region / city:
United States
Theme:
Organic agriculture, regulatory processes
Document type:
Government report
Organ / institution:
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
Author:
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Target audience:
Government agencies, agricultural organizations, organic certifiers, farmers
Period of action:
2024-2027
Approval date:
Pending
Amendment date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / city:
United States
Subject:
Healthcare, Patient Experience, Pediatric Hospitals
Document Type:
Report
Agency / Institution:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Author:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Target Audience:
Healthcare professionals, hospital administrators, policymakers, researchers
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
October 12, 2022
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Lafayette, Indiana
Topic:
Lead and Galvanized Water Service Line Replacement
Document Type:
Notice
Organization / Institution:
Lafayette Water Works
Author:
Steve Moore
Target Audience:
Drinking water consumers, property owners
Action Period:
7 years (estimated)
Approval Date:
November 1, 2024
Date of Changes:
N/A
Context:
A public notice regarding the identification and replacement of galvanized water service lines potentially downstream of lead pipes, outlining health risks, steps for reducing exposure to lead, and replacement options.
Year:
2026
Region / city:
N/A
Topic:
Research protocols review
Document type:
Review form
Organization / institution:
eCompliance
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Researchers, Institutional Review Boards (IRB)
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
Context:
A review form for ongoing research protocols used to update institutional review boards on participant data, protocol deviations, and study status.
Year:
2013
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Developmental Language Disorder (DLD)
Document Type:
Care Pathway
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Health professionals, therapists, parents, educators
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of last update:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Cheshire and Merseyside
Topic:
Healthcare, Continuing Care
Document Type:
Procedure Guide
Organization:
NHS Cheshire and Merseyside
Author:
NHS Continuing Healthcare
Target Audience:
Healthcare practitioners, case managers, legal representatives
Period of Validity:
From 1 April 2012 onwards
Approval Date:
January 2023
Date of Amendments:
None specified