№ lp_1_2_19457
File format: docx
Character count: 6448
File size: 519 KB
The document outlines the grading criteria and assessment guidelines for students participating in the EPICS (Engineering Projects in Community Service) program, including individual and team-based requirements, reflection, and self-assessment for project outcomes.
Note:
Year
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Grading Rubric
Year:
2023
Region / City:
West Lafayette, IN
Topic:
Community-engaged design
Document Type:
Syllabus
Institution:
Purdue University
Author:
EPICS Program
Target Audience:
Purdue University students
Effective Period:
Academic semester
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Texas, USA
Topic:
Healthcare Data Integration, OMOP CDM, Epic ETL
Document Type:
Research Paper
Organization / Institution:
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Texas Health Resources
Authors:
Aamirah Vadsariya, Mereeja Varghese, Bhavini Nayee, Jessica Moon, Chaitanya Katterapalli, Clark Walker, Chris Gonzalez, Sonam Sohal, Christoph U. Lehmann, Ferdinand Velasco, Mujeeb Basit, DuWayne Willett
Target Audience:
Healthcare professionals, researchers in healthcare data systems
Period of Action:
2023
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Type of document:
Evaluation rubric
Framework:
High-Leverage Practices
Primary focus:
HLP 7
Embedded practices:
HLP 8, HLP 9, HLP 13, HLP 14, HLP 15, HLP 17, HLP 18, HLP 19, HLP 21
Educational context:
Inclusive and special education
Performance levels:
Ineffective, Approaching Effective, Effective, Highly Effective
Key dimensions:
Expectations, Organization, Teacher Tone, Structure, Student Characteristics, Teacher Feedback
Target population:
Students with disabilities
Referenced organizations:
Council for Exceptional Children; CEEDAR Center; GMU TTAC Region 4
Referenced years:
2019–2024
Geographic reference:
United States
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Tennessee
Subject:
Education, Emergency Remote Learning
Document Type:
Template, Guidance
Organization:
Tennessee Department of Education
Author:
Tennessee Department of Education
Target Audience:
Local Education Agencies, Public Charter Schools
Effective Period:
2020-2021 school year
Approval Date:
June 26, 2020
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Arlington, VA
Topic:
Education, High-Leverage Practices, Special Education
Document Type:
Self-Assessment Tool
Organization / Institution:
Council for Exceptional Children, CEEDAR Center
Author:
T. C. Aceves, M. J. Kennedy
Target Audience:
Educators, Educational Professionals
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
February 2024
Date of Changes:
None
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Arlington, VA
Theme:
High-leverage practices for students with disabilities
Document type:
Self-assessment tool
Organization / Institution:
Council for Exceptional Children, CEEDAR Center
Author:
T. C. Aceves, M. J. Kennedy, A. I. Hashey, T. L. Kaczorowski, D. M. DiCesare, J. McLeskey
Target audience:
Educators, specialists in special education
Period of validity:
2024
Approval date:
February 2024
Modification date:
February 2024
Year:
2026
Institution:
Villanova University Office for Residence Life
Document Type:
Evaluation Rubric
Target Audience:
Resident Assistants and Staff Supervisors
Components:
Administrative Responsibilities, Community Development, Communication, Paperwork, Timeliness, CB Planning and Execution, CB Proposals and Reports
Date of Issue:
2026
Year:
2014
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Education, Language Development, Literacy
Document Type:
Educational Rubric
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Educators, Curriculum Developers
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Early Childhood Education
Document Type:
Rubric
Institution:
California Early Childhood Education Program
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Early Childhood Education students and instructors
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Year:
2020
Region / city:
Multiple (various cities across South Africa)
Topic:
Assessment Plan, Assignment Instructions
Document Type:
Academic assessment guide
Institution:
North-West University (NWU)
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Students at North-West University
Period of validity:
2020
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Program:
Doctor of Management; Doctor of Computer Science
Document Type:
Evaluation Rubric / Guidelines
Chapters Covered:
4, 5, and 6 chapter options
Sections:
Front Matter, Chapter 1–Chapter 4, Appendices
Format Standards:
APA 6th Edition
Target Audience:
Doctoral students and faculty evaluators
Purpose:
Assessment of dissertation proposals and manuscripts
Content Scope:
Research problem, purpose, literature review, methodology, findings, conceptual framework, ethical considerations
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Capstone Project, Methods Section
Document Type:
Worksheet
Institution:
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Capstone project students, Advisors
Effective Date:
Spring 2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Revisions:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
High-leverage practices in education
Document Type:
Educational Assessment Tool
Organization / Institution:
CEEDAR Center
Authors:
CEEDAR Center, Hashey, A. I., Kaczorowski, T. L., DiCesare, D. M., McLeskey, J.
Target Audience:
Educators, Special Education Professionals
Period of Effectiveness:
2022
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Arlington, VA
Topic:
Social Skills Instruction for Students with Disabilities
Document Type:
Self-assessment tool
Organization:
Council for Exceptional Children, CEEDAR Center
Author(s):
T. C. Aceves, M. J. Kennedy, J. McLeskey
Target Audience:
Teachers, school professionals, administrators
Effective Period:
2024
Approval Date:
February 2024
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Program:
Regional Flexible Funding (RFF) Program
Plan referenced:
2050 Metropolitan Transportation Plan
Document type:
Evaluation rubric and application narrative requirements
Purpose:
Scoring and assessment of project narratives
Organ / committee:
Project Selection Committee
Audience:
Project applicants seeking funding
Evaluation criteria:
Alignment with selected MTP goals
Structure:
Three-paragraph narrative assessed across responsiveness levels
Time horizon:
2050
Funding context:
Regional transportation funding
Note:
Year