№ lp_2_3_17305
File format: docx
Character count: 14984
File size: 202 KB
Official grant application instructions and structured budget narrative template issued by the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services outlining requirements, funding conditions, submission procedures, and personnel cost justifications under the VOCA Victims Services Grant Program for fiscal years 2020 and 2021.
Year:
Fiscal Years 2020 and 2021
Application Deadline:
March 4, 2019, 5:00 p.m.
Funding Program:
Victims Services Grant Program (VSGP)
Funding Source:
VOCA Victims Services Grant
Document Type:
Grant application instructions and budget narrative template
Issuing Agency:
Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS)
Submission Method:
Electronic submission via email
Required Attachments:
Excel Budget Workbook; Annual Program Service Objectives file; Complete signed application in PDF format
Geographic Scope:
Virginia
Budget Categories:
Personnel; Fringe Benefits; Direct Services to Crime Victims
Regulatory Framework:
VOCA Rule; State and Federal Grant Guidelines
Eligible Costs:
Costs directly related and essential to providing direct services to crime victims
Planning Period Allowance:
Up to three months at the beginning of the grant cycle for new projects
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Applications Due Date:
September 31st
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Oregon
Topic:
Employment, Payroll
Document Type:
Legal Notice, Employer Requirements
Organization / Institution:
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI)
Author:
Oregon State Legislature
Target Audience:
Employers, Employees
Effective Date:
January 1, 2026
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2019
Region/City:
USA
Subject:
Healthcare Data Collection
Document Type:
Form
Organization:
NHSN (National Healthcare Safety Network)
Author:
NHSN Staff
Target Audience:
Healthcare Facilities
Period of Validity:
Annual
Approval Date:
2019
Revision Date:
January 2020
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Manufacturing Machinery and Equipment
Document Type:
Form
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Businesses, Property Owners, Lessees
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Document Type:
Cost estimate form
Subject:
Service or product cost estimation
Fields Included:
Description, Unit cost, Quantity or Hourly rate, Amount
Financial Fields:
Subtotal, Discount, Tax rate, Tax, Estimate Total
Issuer Information Fields:
Company name, Street address, Phone number, Email, Website
Recipient Information Fields:
Client name, Street address, City, State, Country, ZIP Code
Estimate Number:
0001
Date Field Format:
mm/dd/yyyy
Contact Information Format:
Address, phone number, email, website
Currency Display:
Dollar format ($)
Associated Service:
Invoice Quickly
Generation Note:
Estimate generated by Invoice Quickly
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Seattle
Topic:
Service dogs, ableism, disability justice
Document Type:
Research Article
Organization / Institution:
Seattle Pacific University, Department of Physics
Author:
Amy D. Robertson
Target Audience:
Researchers, disability advocates, public policy experts
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Investment Reporting and Project Progress
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Gates Foundation
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Grantees, Program Officers
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Transitional Housing, Domestic Violence Support
Document Type:
Application Guide
Organization:
Office on Violence Against Women (OVW)
Author:
OVW
Target Audience:
Applicants for OVW Transitional Housing Assistance Grant Program
Period of Effect:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
MM/DD/YYYY
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Environmental Impact Assessment
Document Type:
Environmental Review Checklist
Agency / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Project Managers, Environmental Consultants
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Washington University School of Medicine
Subject:
Design and Construction Documentation
Document Type:
Guideline
Organization / Institution:
Washington University
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Design Team, Facilities Maintenance Technicians, Project Managers
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
January 1, 2015
Revision Date:
May 4, 2022
Year:
2024
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Teaching effectiveness, self-reflection, course documentation
Document type:
Guide
Institution:
KU Center for Teaching Excellence
Author:
KU Center for Teaching Excellence
Target audience:
Instructors, faculty members
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
June 2024
Date of last modification:
June 2024
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Theme:
Literacy, Language Features, Narrative
Document Type:
Educational Resource
Organization / Institution:
Department of Education and Training, Victoria
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Primary educators, curriculum designers
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Office Administration, On-the-Job Training
Document Type:
Narrative Report
Organization / Institution:
Bright Solutions Consultancy
Author:
Sophia Martinez
Period of Action:
June 1, 2024 - August 31, 2024
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Programme Progress Report
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
UN
Author:
MPTF Office
Target Audience:
UN organizations, governmental and non-governmental partners, financial institutions, donors
Period of Validity:
1 January – 31 December 2022
Approval Date:
dd.mm.yyyy
Date of Amendments:
dd.mm.yyyy
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Environmental Regulations, Site Characterization, Project Submissions
Document Type:
Instructional Template
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Author:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Target Audience:
Class VI well owners or operators, regulatory bodies
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Health Care, COVID-19 Response
Document Type:
Template, Instructions
Organization:
HRSA (Health Resources and Services Administration)
Author:
HRSA
Target Audience:
Health Centers, Organizations Applying for Funding
Effective Period:
2021-2023
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2019
Region / City:
New South Wales
Subject:
English
Document Type:
Educational Resource
Author:
Department of Education, State of NSW
Target Audience:
Year 12 Students, English Teachers
Date Approved:
2016
Date Modified:
Not specified
Context:
This document is an educational guide for English teachers and students, focusing on the creation of narratives in response to creative writing prompts, with reference to the 2019 HSC marking feedback.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Idaho
Subject:
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Document Type:
Environmental Compliance Document
Issuing Authority:
Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ)
Target Audience:
Contractors, project operators, environmental managers
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
2022
Modification Date:
Ongoing
Context:
This document is a detailed regulatory framework for stormwater pollution prevention for construction activities in Idaho under the IPDES program, outlining operator responsibilities, compliance with federal and state regulations, and environmental best practices.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Alexandria, VA
Subject:
Sexual Assault Prevention and Response
Document Type:
Policy
Organization:
Department of Defense
Author:
Ms. Bette Inch
Target Audience:
Department of Defense Personnel, Military Staff, Contractors
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified