№ files_lp_3_process_9_03733
File format: docx Character count: 5601 File size: 22 KB
Chronological process report detailing inter-institutional meetings, survey design decisions, pilot testing, stakeholder validation, and statewide dissemination of employer and alumni surveys aligned to CAEP and InTASC standards in Alabama between 2015 and 2018.
Year: 2015–2018
Region / State: Alabama
Institutions Involved: ALACTE member institutions (27), Alabama State Department of Education, various Alabama Institutions of Higher Education
Type of Document: Process report
Subject: Development of statewide employer and alumni surveys aligned to CAEP and InTASC standards
Organizations Mentioned: ALACTE, CAEP, Alabama State Department of Education, AACTE
Key Participants: Dr. Lou Ann Worthington; Dr. Rhonda Morton; Dr. Diana Cheshire; Dr. Rosemary Hodges; Dr. David Crowe; Dr. Anna Kozlowski
Meetings Covered: July 2015 – February 2018
Primary Standards Referenced: CAEP Standards; InTASC Standards
Purpose: Creation, validation, piloting, and statewide implementation of employer and in-service (alumni) surveys
Methodology Notes: Use of rating scale format; content validation using the Lawshe method; statewide dissemination via Survey Monkey
Stakeholders: CAEP Coordinators; representatives from Institutions of Higher Education; state education officials; employers; first-year teachers
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.

Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?

You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:
  1. Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
  2. In the app, tap Send.
  3. Select network, paste our wallet address.
  4. Send the exact amount shown above.
After sending, paste your TXID (transaction ID) and your email to receive the download link. Need help? Contact support and we’ll guide you step by step.

The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Standards Alignment: CAEP Standard One – R1.1 The Learner and Learning
Standard: CAEP Standard One – R1.1
Related Standards: InTASC Standards 1, 2, 3
Focus Area: Learner Development, Learning Differences, Learning Environments
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Regulatory Framework: Louisiana state laws and policy regulations
Coordinating Office: Assessment Coordinator in consultation with Program/Discipline Chairs
Assessment System: Watermark – Taskstream
Programs Covered: Initial Undergraduate; Initial Graduate; MAT Alternative Teacher Certification Program; Master of Arts Program
Courses Referenced: ED 402; ED 452; ED 453; ED 455; EDPT 528; EDPT 599
Assessments Included: Lesson Plan Year Long Residency/Internship; Showcase Portfolio; Technology Unit Plan; Teacher Toolkit Project; Case Study Project
Target Population: Teacher candidates; P-12 students and their families
Assessment Framework: Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Data Sources: Qualitative and quantitative student data; pre- and post-assessments
Documentation Access: Clinical Handbook; Canvas; Watermark – Taskstream
CAEP Accountability Measure 3: Candidate Competency in Technology Proficiency at Program Completion 2020-2025
Year: 2020-2025
Region / Institution: Texas, United States
Topic: Teacher Education, Technology Integration
Document Type: Assessment Report
Organization: Educator Preparation Program (EPP)
Author: Rhonda Christensen & Gerald Knezek
Target Audience: Educators, Program Administrators, Accreditation Bodies
Assessment Tool: Technology Proficiency Self-Assessment for 21st Century Learning (TPSA C21)
Subscales: Teaching with Emerging Technologies, Teaching with Technology, Integrated Applications, Emerging Tools, WWW, Email
Data Collection Period: Fall 2023 – Spring 2024
Results Publication: 2024-25
Citation: Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33:1, 20-31, DOI: 10.1080/21532974.2016.1242391
GEF SGP Project Proposal Template and Guidelines for Operational Phase 6 (2015–2018)
Program: GEF Small Grants Programme (SGP)
Operational Phase: Operational Phase 6
Period Covered: 2015–2018
Country Reference: Nepal
Document Type: Project proposal template and submission guidelines
Issuing Organization: GEF Small Grants Programme
Target Applicants: Community-based organizations, NGOs, research and training institutions
Thematic Areas: Biodiversity Conservation; Climate Change; Land Degradation and Sustainable Forest Management; International Waters; Chemicals (POPs)
Sections Included: Project Rationale and Approach; Project Risks, Monitoring & Evaluation; Project Budget
Submission Requirements: Standard cover sheet; table of contents; maximum 15–20 pages; supporting attachments up to 10 pages
Submission Recipient: National Coordinator, GEF Small Grants Programme
Financial Information Required: GEF funding request; co-financing; total project cost; UN rate of exchange
Unit B Lecturer Annual Performance Evaluation Form (Contract 2015–2018)
Year: 20____–____
Note: Department
Multi-Year Appointment Status: Eligible for Multi-Year Appointment (Yes/No)
Yearly Appointment: (Yes/No)
Eligibility Criteria: 10 or more years full-time in Unit B and highly effective performance evaluations for two of the preceding five years
Governing Agreement: 2015–2018 Contract, Article 33.1.b
Statutory Reference: Illinois Statute 110ILCS 660/5-70
Evaluation Areas: Teaching; Primary Duty (Non-Teaching Activities)
Performance Ratings: Unsatisfactory; Satisfactory; Highly Effective
Evaluation Components: Student evaluations; DAC-required materials; submitted teaching materials; personnel file materials; additional documentation; classroom observation if negative evaluation
Evaluators: Chairperson/Program Director; Dean
Distribution of Copies: Faculty Member; Dean; Contract Administrator; Department Chair
Signatures Required: Chairperson/Program Director; Dean
Traditional and Khoi-San Leadership Bill, 2015–2018
Year: 2015
Country: Republic of South Africa
Document type: Legislative bill
Subject: Recognition and governance of traditional and Khoi-San leadership and councils
Responsible authority: Minister of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs
Legislative body: Parliament of the Republic of South Africa
Status: Introduced in National Assembly, published in Government Gazette
Amendments: Includes provisions for amendment and repeal of legislation
Relevant committees: Commission on Traditional Leadership Disputes and Claims, Advisory Committee on Khoi-San Matters
Coverage: National, provincial, and local levels
Key entities: National House of Traditional and Khoi-San Leaders, provincial houses, local houses, kingship and queenship councils, traditional councils, Khoi-San councils
Supplementary Figures and Tables on O3-related Health Impacts and Economic Losses in 334 Chinese Cities, 2015–2018
Year: 2015–2018
Country: China
Geographic coverage: 334 Chinese cities and provincial level statistics
Subject: Air pollution, ozone exposure, mortality and economic loss
Pollutant: O3 (ozone)
Document type: Supplementary material
Content type: Figures and statistical tables
Data level: City-level and provincial-level statistics
Indicators: Baseline mortality, value of statistical life (VSL), permanent population, ozone concentration, cardiovascular mortality, respiratory mortality, all-cause mortality, economic losses
Exposure parameters: Time spent outdoors and inhalation rates by province and season
Health outcomes: All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, respiratory mortality attributable to ozone exposure
Economic indicators: Economic loss from ozone-related mortality (billion Yuan)
Temporal coverage: 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018
Regional units: Chinese provinces and municipalities
Statistical units: Thousand deaths and billion Yuan
Topics: ALACTE CAEP 2015–2018