№ files_lp_4_process_3_104262
File format: docx
Character count: 5684
File size: 27 KB
Educational activity guide describing a structured classroom role-play exercise in which students analyze grade disputes and practice presenting arguments to teachers using a nine-step communication framework.
Year:
2015
Theme:
Academics
Document Type:
Educational classroom activity guide
Author:
Katie Hale
Institution:
Georgia State University
Source Adaptation:
wikiHow (“How to get a teacher to raise your grade”)
Target Audience:
Students
Educational Level:
Secondary education
Activity Format:
Role-play classroom exercise
Materials:
Printed 9-step chart; printed scenario cards
Number of Scenarios:
3
Instructional Method:
Pair role-play and group discussion
Primary Topic:
Communication with teachers about grades
Skills Addressed:
Negotiation, academic responsibility, classroom communication
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Savannah, Georgia
Topic:
Taxes and Fees
Document Type:
Ordinance
Organization:
City of Savannah Revenue Department
Author:
Judee Jones, Revenue Director
Target Audience:
Residents and businesses of Savannah
Period of Validity:
2025
Approval Date:
December 19, 2024
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Document Type:
Campaign Letter
Organization:
[Insert Your Organization or Name]
Author:
[Insert Your Name]
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
[Insert Date]
Modification Date:
[Insert Date]
Note:
Year
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Health, Cholesterol
Document Type:
Health Guide
Organization / Institution:
WebMD
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Adults interested in improving heart health
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Month:
January
Organisation:
Commissioner for Public Appointments for Northern Ireland (CPANI)
Region:
Northern Ireland
Document Type:
Guidance
Subject:
Raising concerns and whistleblowing procedures
Scope:
Internal staff and external members of the public
Legal Framework:
Public Interest Disclosure (NI) Order 1998
Related Policies:
NICS Grievance Policy; CPANI Complaints Procedure
Applies To:
CPANI staff; members of the public; external stakeholders
Purpose:
Procedures for reporting concerns in the public interest and explanation of how concerns are managed
Topics Covered:
Public interest disclosures; grievances; complaints; internal reporting; external disclosures; handling of concerns
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Columbus, GA
Subject:
Pay raise request for GIS Technician
Document type:
Letter
Author:
David W. Griffin
Target audience:
Ms. Drale Short, Chief - Internal Services Division, Public Works Department
Effective period:
2017
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
North Dakota
Topic:
Engineering Services, Infrastructure Projects
Document Type:
Request for Proposal
Organization:
North Dakota Department of Transportation (NDDOT)
Author:
William T. Panos
Target Audience:
Engineering Firms, Consultants
Effective Period:
From October 21, 2020
Approval Date:
October 21, 2020
Amendments Date:
None specified
Scope:
Phase I, II, III, IV
Project Description:
The project is related to infrastructure development involving engineering services for multiple grade raise projects in North Dakota.
Project Grouping:
Multiple
Project Completion Date:
March 15, 2022 (for most projects)
Environmental and Design Services:
Included in Phase II
Final Design Services:
Included in Phase III
Project Data Ownership:
NDDOT
Sub Consultant Requirement:
Included
Technology/Standards Used:
MS Word, MS Excel, MircoStation, Geopak, OpenRoads Designer CE, Adobe Acrobat, etc.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Geneva
Topic:
Telecommunications, ICT Standards, Service Quality
Document Type:
Resolution
Organization:
International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
Author:
ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T)
Target Audience:
Telecommunications regulators, operators, suppliers, and stakeholders
Period of validity:
2020-2023
Approval Date:
March 2022
Date of Amendments:
None
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Savannah, Georgia
Topic:
Taxation and Revenue Ordinance
Document Type:
Legal Ordinance
Organization / Institution:
City of Savannah Revenue Department
Author:
Revenue Director Judee Jones
Target Audience:
Local Government Officials, Business Owners, Residents of Savannah
Period of Validity:
2025
Approval Date:
December 19, 2024
Amendment Date:
June 26, 2025
Year:
2026
Region:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Cancer Support / Charity Fundraising
Document Type:
Public Appeal / Fundraising Campaign
Organization:
Macmillan Cancer Support
Charity Registration Numbers:
England and Wales (261017), Scotland (SC039907), Isle of Man (604)
Operating Areas:
England, Wales, Scotland, Isle of Man, Northern Ireland
Contact Information:
Phone 0300 1000 200, Website macmillan.org.uk
Call to Action:
Donate, volunteer, raise money, campaign
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Unknown
Topic:
Charity, Fundraising
Document Type:
Announcement
Organization:
Riverside
Author:
Paul Dolan
Target Audience:
General public, donors
Period of Effect:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
England
Topic:
Education, Outreach, Higher Education
Document Type:
Programme Plan
Institution:
University of Manchester
Author:
Office for Students
Target Audience:
Schools, Students, Educators
Period of Implementation:
2023-2025
Approval Date:
2023
Changes Date:
2023
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Washington State
Theme:
Fundraising for Animal Health
Document Type:
Fundraising Event Announcement
Organization / Institution:
Washington State Animal Health Foundation
Author:
Washington State Veterinary Medical Association
Target Audience:
Veterinary Community, Potential Donors
Action Period:
September 22, 2023
Approval Date:
August 25, 2023
Change Date:
N/A
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Colombia, Brazil
Theme:
Corporate Responsibility, Human Rights
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Canadian Network on Corporate Accountability (CNCA)
Author:
CNCA
Target Audience:
Communities affected by corporate activities, human rights defenders, civil society organizations
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Winslow, Buckinghamshire
Topic:
Community Event, Fundraising
Document Type:
Article
Organization:
Swan House, Ambient Support
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Local community, supporters of Swan House
Start Date:
October 14, 2022
End Date:
November 2022
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Context:
A local community event in Winslow, Buckinghamshire aimed at raising funds for Swan House, a care home, by encouraging the public to participate in a gnome painting campaign to support residents.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2017
Region / city:
Armenia
Topic:
Child Rights, Education, Disability
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Human Rights Watch
Author:
Human Rights Watch
Target Audience:
General public, policymakers, NGOs, international organizations
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
Contextual description:
A report documenting the abuse, discrimination, and lack of access to quality education for children with disabilities in Armenia’s residential institutions.
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Bucks County, Doylestown, PA
Subject:
Child Support, Spousal Support, Alimony Pendente Lite
Document Type:
Informational Guide
Organization / Institution:
Bucks County Domestic Relations Section
Target Audience:
Individuals seeking support or modifications to existing support orders
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Aurora, Colorado
Topic:
Exterior property improvements
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organ / Institution:
Residential Improvement Guideline Committee
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Homeowners in the Inspiration Metropolitan District
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Bristol, Essex, Franklin, Hampden, Hampshire, Middlesex, Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk, Worcester
Theme:
Health Insurance, Medicare
Document Type:
Brochure
Organization / Institution:
Commonwealth Care Alliance, Inc. (CCA)
Author:
Commonwealth Care Alliance, Inc.
Target Audience:
People 65 or older, eligible for Medicare and MassHealth Standard
Period of validity:
2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Description