№ lp_1_2_27737
File format: docx
Character count: 5064
File size: 1759 KB
A brochure offering detailed information on the CCA Senior Care Options (HMO D-SNP) health plan, available for seniors eligible for Medicare and MassHealth, detailing benefits like dental coverage, transportation, and prescription drugs.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Bristol, Essex, Franklin, Hampden, Hampshire, Middlesex, Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk, Worcester
Theme:
Health Insurance, Medicare
Document Type:
Brochure
Organization / Institution:
Commonwealth Care Alliance, Inc. (CCA)
Author:
Commonwealth Care Alliance, Inc.
Target Audience:
People 65 or older, eligible for Medicare and MassHealth Standard
Period of validity:
2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Description
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2024
Region / Country:
Global
Theme:
Illegal Wildlife Trade
Document Type:
Annual Report
Organization:
IWT Challenge Fund
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Project Leaders, IWT Challenge Fund partners
Period of Action:
2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2000
Region / city:
United States
Theme:
Elections, History, Government
Document type:
Educational Lesson Plan
Author:
Stephanie Schragger
Target audience:
Students, Grades 7-12
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of last modification:
Not specified
Context:
Educational resource aimed at teaching about contested elections in U.S. history, specifically the 2000 and 2020 elections.
Year:
2025
Region / city:
N/A
Topic:
Amateur radio exam question pool errata
Document Type:
Errata
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Amateur radio operators
Period of validity:
2024-2028
Approval Date:
September 25, 2025
Amendment Date:
November 8, 2024, January 31, 2024
Note:
Year
Subject:
Assessment Arrangements
Document Type:
Example Form
Target Audience:
Educational Staff
Institution:
St. John Vianney R.C. Primary School
City:
Edinburgh
Country:
Scotland
Year:
2025
Document type:
Information guide
Intended audience:
Families and carers of pupils
Subject:
Financial support and welfare benefits
Update date:
February 2025
Geographic scope:
City of Edinburgh
Related authorities:
City of Edinburgh Council; Social Security Scotland
Educational stage:
Primary and secondary education
Reference period:
2025–2026 school years
Year:
[Prompt: insert year]
Region / City:
[Prompt: insert region or city]
Topic:
Distribution System Connection Agreement
Document Type:
Agreement
Agency / Institution:
Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution PLC
Author:
[Prompt: insert author or organization]
Target Audience:
[Prompt: insert target audience]
Period of Validity:
[Prompt: insert validity period]
Approval Date:
[Prompt: insert approval date]
Amendment Date:
[Prompt: insert amendment date]
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Construction contracts, extra work pricing
Document Type:
Contract clause
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Contractors and subcontractors
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Dorset
Theme:
Child Protection, Safeguarding
Document Type:
Terms of Reference
Organization:
Dorset Council, Dorset Police
Target Audience:
Professionals involved in child protection and safeguarding
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
September 2023
Date of Changes:
None
Note:
Year
Topic:
Christian teachings, contentment, financial happiness
Document Type:
Study Guide
Author:
David Roach
Target Audience:
Adults
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Jarrow, United Kingdom
Parish:
Saint Bede’s, Saint Joseph’s, Saint Matthew’s, Saint Mary’s
Events:
First Holy Communion, Confirmation, Sacristans’ Course, Readers Course, Memorial Masses, World Mission Sunday, CAFOD Family Fast Day
Church activities:
Weekday Mass, Rosary, Exposition, Sanctuary Lamp intentions
Contact:
Fr Adrian Dixon, Fr Saji Thottathill, Sr Mary Lees, Deacon Kevin Atkinson
Charity:
Missio, CAFOD
Special dates:
24 October, 31 October, 7 November, 15–27 November
Website:
jarrowcatholic.org.uk
Email contacts:
[email protected]
Year:
2024
Region / City:
China
Topic:
Service, Creativity, Children, Group Projects
Document Type:
Educational Material
Organization / Institution:
LEGO China
Author:
Travis Agnew
Target Audience:
Adults, Christian Community
Action Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
September 29, 2024
Change Date:
N/A
Contextual Description:
This educational material explores themes of service, creativity, and community, encouraging adults to prioritize helping others in both personal and group settings.
Service name:
Newcastle Why Weight Integrated Weight Management Service
Programme:
Newcastle EXTRA TIME Service
Region / City:
Newcastle upon Tyne
Country:
United Kingdom
Organisations:
Newcastle City Council; The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Type of document:
Service referral form
Subject:
Adult weight management and clinical assessment
Target group:
Adults over 16 years meeting specified BMI criteria
BMI criteria:
White European BMI ≥ 30 or ≥ 28 with co-morbidities; South East Asian BMI ≥ 27.5
Required information:
Personal details, NHS number, medical history, medication, measurements, clinical indicators
Health indicators included:
Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, NASH, NAFLD, sleep apnoea, COPD, asthma, epilepsy, hypothyroid, musculoskeletal conditions, psychological difficulties
Assessment areas:
Dietetic and clinical psychology assessment
Legal reference:
Data Protection Act 1998
Authorisation:
Referrer signature and patient consent required
Contact address:
Why Weight, Sport, Health and Fitness Team, Newcastle City Council, Allendale Road, Room GF8, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2SZ
Contact telephone:
01912788558
Contact fax:
01912788559
Contact email:
[email protected]
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Not specified
Theme:
Press release, Qualification renewal, Arborist industry
Document type:
Instructional document
Organization / institution:
ASCA (American Society of Consulting Arborists)
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Industry professionals, media, press
Validity period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of change:
Not specified
Course:
ECE 3355 – Electronics
Assignment Number:
Homework #10
Textbook:
Microelectronic Circuits, 8th Edition
Textbook Authors:
Adel S. Sedra; Kenneth C. Smith
Chapter:
7
Referenced Problems:
7.125; 7.131
Additional Problems:
E10.1; E10.2; E10.3
Subject Area:
Electronic Circuits
Topic:
BJT Amplifiers
Transistor Parameter:
β = 100
Operating Condition:
Room temperature
Amplifier Types Covered:
Common-Base; Common-Collector (Emitter-Follower); Common-Emitter
Academic Context:
University-level electrical engineering course
Note:
Year
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2017
Region / city:
Armenia
Topic:
Child Rights, Education, Disability
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Human Rights Watch
Author:
Human Rights Watch
Target Audience:
General public, policymakers, NGOs, international organizations
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
Contextual description:
A report documenting the abuse, discrimination, and lack of access to quality education for children with disabilities in Armenia’s residential institutions.
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Bucks County, Doylestown, PA
Subject:
Child Support, Spousal Support, Alimony Pendente Lite
Document Type:
Informational Guide
Organization / Institution:
Bucks County Domestic Relations Section
Target Audience:
Individuals seeking support or modifications to existing support orders
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Aurora, Colorado
Topic:
Exterior property improvements
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organ / Institution:
Residential Improvement Guideline Committee
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Homeowners in the Inspiration Metropolitan District
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2013
Region / City:
Microsoft France
Topic:
Azure Rights Management, Logging, Cloud Services
Document Type:
Technical Article
Organization / Institution:
Microsoft France
Author:
Philippe Beraud, Arnaud Jumelet
Target Audience:
IT professionals, System Architects
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
November 2013
Revision Date:
October 2014