№ lp_1_2_61529
File format: docx
Character count: 5395
File size: 18 KB
This document provides a detailed breakdown of rhetorical strategies and frameworks used in visual arguments, offering analytical tools for understanding how visual media, particularly documentaries, appeal to ethos, pathos, and logos.
Note:
Year
Theme:
Rhetoric in Visual Arguments
Document Type:
Educational Material
Author:
Laurie Gries, PhD
Target Audience:
Students, Researchers, Filmmakers
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Course Code:
WRT 542-04
Course Title:
Writing in the Primary I
Term:
Spring 2024
Instructor:
Gina Troisi
Telephone:
(603)-767-6769
Email:
[email protected]
Institution:
Western Connecticut State University
Credit Hours:
4
Course Format:
Independent study with email communication and monthly Google Meets meetings
Course Description:
Faculty-mentored research and writing of a customized creative nonfiction project
Learning Outcomes:
Development of original creative nonfiction with controlled point of view, crafted character and setting, and concise narrative structure
Required Materials:
No supplemental readings currently assigned
Assignments:
Minimum 35 pages of creative nonfiction submitted in four installments of 9–10 pages
Grading Components:
Reading Responses (700 points); Zoom Meeting Discussions (100 points)
Total Points:
800
Grading Scale:
Letter grades A through F based on percentage ranges
Submission Method:
Email
Key Dates:
February 2, 2024; March 1, 2024; March 29, 2024; April 26, 2024
Policies Included:
Attendance and participation; late assignments; academic honesty; plagiarism prohibition including AI use; accommodations for disabilities; diversity and inclusion; mental health support
Academic Honesty Policy:
Prohibits plagiarism and use of artificial intelligence tools for assignments
Department:
Department of Creative and Professional Writing
Year:
n.d.
Region / City:
n.d.
Topic:
Sports Betting Regulation
Document Type:
Rebuttal Arguments
Organization / Institution:
n.d.
Author:
n.d.
Target Audience:
n.d.
Period of Validity:
n.d.
Approval Date:
n.d.
Date of Changes:
n.d.
Note:
Year
Topic:
Logic, Philosophy
Document Type:
Lesson Plan
Target Audience:
Students of Philosophy
Year:
2008
Region / City:
India
Subject:
Pension Disparities and Constitutional Implications
Document Type:
Court Judgment
Agency / Institution:
Supreme Court of India
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, Government officials
Period of Validity:
Not applicable
Approval Date:
09/09/2008
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2014
Region:
North Carolina
Event:
High School Ethics Bowl
Document Type:
Educational handout
Subject:
Ethical argumentation and logical fallacies
Topic:
Argument structure and common logical fallacies
Issuing Organization:
North Carolina High School Ethics Bowl
Purpose:
Guidance for judging ethical argumentation in competition rounds
Audience:
Judges of the High School Ethics Bowl
Educational Level:
High school
Content Elements:
Definitions, examples, and analyses of logical fallacies
Year:
2017
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Argument Evaluation, Evidence Analysis, Literary Genres
Document Type:
Educational Lesson
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2026
Subject:
English 12
Type of Document:
Assignment Instructions
Audience:
High school students
Author:
Course Instructor
Duration:
1 semester
Format:
Multimedia presentation (individual or pair)
Assessment:
Graded using content and quality rubrics
Tasks Included:
Text selection, thesis statement, research, draft outlines, presentation
Course:
Dual Credit Senior English
Chapters:
1-3
Topic:
Argumentation and Academic Writing
Document Type:
Study Notes
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
High school students enrolled in dual credit English
Key Concepts:
Credibility, Fallacies, Controversy Mapping, MLA Formatting, Argument Basics
Referenced Materials:
Diana Hacker’s Pocket Guide
Page References:
pp. 2, 5-7, 11-12, 13, 17-19, 22, 29, 32-33
Year:
2025
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Energy Regulation
Document Type:
Regulatory Order
Organization / Institution:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Author:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Target Audience:
Energy sector professionals, regulatory bodies
Effective Period:
From June 1, 2025
Approval Date:
July 2, 2025
Date of Changes:
N/A
Document type:
Academic assignment brief
Subject:
Rhetorical analysis of a public health website
Primary source analyzed:
CDC website on Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Institution:
Grand Canyon University
Referenced organization:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Required length:
750–1,000 words
Required sources:
At least two scholarly sources outside of class texts
Citation style:
GCU Style
Submission platform:
LopesWrite
Intended audience:
University students
Course context:
Rhetorical analysis and academic writing
Assignment components:
First draft and final draft
Evaluation method:
Rubric-based grading
Focus:
Analysis of rhetorical situation and rhetorical strategies
Source type:
Public informational website
Timeframe:
Week 2, Module 2
Year:
1990
Author:
Amy Tan
Genre:
Essay
Audience:
Asian Americans struggling with English
Purpose:
Educate about struggles of bilingualism and language barriers
Evidence:
Anecdotes and personal experiences
Rhetorical Strategies:
Use of examples, changing grammar to reflect “broken English”
Publication:
Threepenny Review
Context:
Struggles of being bilingual and assimilating as an immigrant
Year:
2011
Region / City:
USA
Subject:
Rhetorical analysis of an article on intuition
Document type:
Analysis
Organization / Institution:
Rutgers University
Author:
Whitney Baird, Regan Cicolte, Eric Lamb, Kathy Robinson, Carol Sieverts
Target Audience:
General public, particularly women over 55
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of modifications:
N/A
Note:
Year
Theme:
Advertising, Sports, Marketing
Document Type:
Rhetorical Analysis
Target Audience:
Soccer players, Sports enthusiasts
Language:
English
Document Type:
Educational viewing guide
Academic Subject:
Rhetoric; English Language and Composition
Educational Level:
11th Grade (English 3 / AP Language preparation)
Related Work:
In the Shadow of Ebola (documentary film)
Producing Organization of Film:
Public Broadcasting System (PBS), Independent Lens
Geographic Focus:
Liberia, West Africa
Historical Context:
Ebola outbreak of 2014–2015
Key Concepts:
Rhetoric; audience; speaker; subject; ethos; logos; pathos
Instructional Context:
Classroom film analysis activity
Intended Audience:
High school students studying rhetorical analysis
Associated Examination:
AP Language Exam (College Board)
Referenced Thinker:
Aristotle
Topic:
Media rhetoric and documentary argumentation
Year:
2026
Type:
Educational Exercise
Subject:
Rhetorical Analysis
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Students studying literature or rhetoric
Document Format:
Instructional Worksheet
Source Text:
Norman Mailer, “Paret was a Cuban”
Focus:
Analysis of quotations and thematic interpretation
Skills Practiced:
Critical thinking, textual evidence interpretation, thematic development
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Subject:
Rhetoric and Communication
Document Type:
Academic Article
Institution / Organization:
ThoughtCo
Author:
Cheryl Glenn, M. Jimmie Killingsworth, John Mauk, John Metz
Target Audience:
Students, Researchers, Educators
Period Covered:
Contemporary
Publication Date:
2026
URL:
https://www.thoughtco.com/exigence-rhetoric-term-1690688
Date:
February 10
Document Type:
Workshop notes and peer review instructions
Context:
Classroom writing workshop
Activity Format:
Small group discussion and written feedback
Group Organization:
Aiden – Sam, Lucas, Adrianna; Ben – Jack, Caden, Delanie; Liz – Tamara, Evie, Nick; Mason – Tommy, Serenity, Zack; Owen – Teddy, Kessa, Ryan
Primary Task:
Peer review of student papers
Writing Assignment:
Rhetorical Analysis
Key Skills:
Argument analysis, use of evidence, quotation integration, paragraph organization, coherence
Referenced Authors:
Sahanika Ratnayake; David Lynch
Referenced Works:
“Mindfulness Is Loaded with (Troubling) Metaphysical Assumptions”; Catching the Big Fish: Meditation, Consciousness, and Creativity
Topics:
Mindfulness meditation, Buddhism, creativity, consciousness, rhetorical analysis
Audience:
Students participating in a writing workshop
Year:
2012
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Rhetoric, Persuasion, Persona, Audience
Document Type:
Essay
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Jessi Kivari
Target Audience:
Students, Scholars of Rhetoric
Period of Application:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Subject:
Writing and rhetoric
Document type:
Educational text
Topic:
Use of sources and quotation in academic writing
Key concept:
Rhetorical sourcing
Cited author:
Joe Harris
Note:
Cited author
Nedra Reynolds
Referenced work:
Geographies of Writing
Referenced chapter:
Learning to Dwell: Inhabiting Spaces and Discourses
Example location:
West Street
Example city:
Syracuse
Example artwork series:
Love Letters to Syracuse
Artist referenced:
Steve Powers
Geographical focus of example:
Urban public space and public art
Educational level:
Academic writing instruction