№ lp_2_3_28985
File format: docx
Character count: 7219
File size: 148 KB
The document is a questionnaire designed to assess teaching practices in the context of dialogic teaching, focusing on the interaction between teachers and students, specifically regarding openness, contributions, and participation in the classroom.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Jena/Cambridge
Topic:
Dialogic teaching, educational dialogue
Document Type:
Questionnaire
Author:
Alexander Gröschner, Sara Hennessy, Ruth Kershner, Mathias Dehne, Elisa Calcagni
Target Audience:
Teachers, students aged 13 to 18
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2021
Authors:
Alexander Gröschner; Sara Hennessy; Ruth Kershner; Mathias Dehne; Elisa Calcagni
Place of publication:
Jena; Cambridge
Language:
English
Thematic area:
Dialogic teaching; classroom interaction; educational research
Document type:
Questionnaire; survey instrument
Target groups:
Teachers; students aged 13–18
Educational level:
Secondary education
Assessment scale:
Six-point Likert scale
Domains assessed:
Openness for Dialogue; Inviting Students’ Contributions; Dialogic Participation
Related framework:
Teacher Scheme for Educational Dialogue Analysis (T-SEDA)
Availability:
Freely available online as part of a resource pack
Research context:
Teaching practice analysis; lesson evaluation
Source type:
Educational research instrument
Year:
2021
Authors:
Alexander Gröschner; Sara Hennessy; Ruth Kershner; Mathias Dehne; Elisa Calcagni
Place of publication:
Jena; Cambridge
Language:
English
Thematic area:
Dialogic teaching; classroom interaction; educational research
Document type:
Questionnaire; survey instrument
Target groups:
Teachers; students aged 13–18
Educational level:
Secondary education
Assessment scale:
Six-point Likert scale
Domains assessed:
Openness for Dialogue; Inviting Students’ Contributions; Dialogic Participation
Related framework:
Teacher Scheme for Educational Dialogue Analysis (T-SEDA)
Availability:
Freely available online as part of a resource pack
Research context:
Teaching practice analysis; lesson evaluation
Source type:
Educational research instrument
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Queensland
Theme:
Education
Document Type:
Template
Organization / Institution:
State of Queensland (QCAA)
Author:
State of Queensland (QCAA)
Target Audience:
Educators
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Licence:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Copyright Notice:
www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/copyright
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Marietta, GA
Subject:
Police training, Brazilian Jiu Jitsu
Document Type:
Article
Organization:
Marietta Police Department
Author:
Major Jake King, Sergeant Clayton Culpepper
Target Audience:
Law enforcement professionals, trainers
Duration of Applicability:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Document type:
Mobility agreement
Programme:
Erasmus+
Academic year:
20../20..
Mobility type:
Staff Mobility for Teaching
Receiving institution:
Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University
Receiving institution Erasmus code:
TR ISTANBU41
Receiving institution country:
Turkey
Receiving institution address:
Halkalı cad. No: 281, Küçükçekmece / İstanbul 343030
Receiving institution contact person:
Prof. Dr. Nasuh USLU, Erasmus Institutional Coordinator
Planned teaching hours:
8
Number of students:
50
Study level:
Bachelor or equivalent first cycle (EQF level 6)
Intended purpose:
Teaching activity
Parties involved:
Teaching staff member, sending institution/enterprise, receiving institution
Year:
2020-2021
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Teacher Training, Primary Education
Document Type:
Guidance Document
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Trainee Teachers
Period of Validity:
2020-2021
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Alaska
Subject:
Early childhood education, assessment
Document Type:
Instructional guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Alaska Department of Education and Early Development (DEED)
Author:
DEED staff
Target Audience:
Early childhood education programs in Alaska
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Chicago
Topic:
Graduate student teaching positions
Document type:
Application Packet
Organization / Institution:
University of Chicago Writing Program
Author:
University of Chicago Writing Program
Target audience:
Graduate students of the University of Chicago
Period of validity:
2026-2027 Academic Year
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2024-2025
Region / City:
Indiana University
Theme:
Teaching Excellence
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Indiana University
Author:
Indiana University Faculty Council
Target Audience:
Faculty members of Indiana University
Period of Validity:
2024-2025
Approval Date:
June 2000
Date of Changes:
February 2015, 2019
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Hampton Park
Topic:
Education, Teaching, Learning
Document Type:
Handbook
Institution:
Hampton Park Secondary College
Target Audience:
Teachers, Education Staff
Period of Implementation:
2025-2028
Approval Date:
June 2024
Modification Date:
June 2024
Mild to Moderate Support Needs Teaching Performance Expectations Comparison Chart Updated April 2021
Year:
2021
Region / City:
California
Topic:
Education
Document Type:
Educational Guidelines
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Teacher Candidates, Education Specialists
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
April 2021
Date of Modifications:
N/A
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Sacramento, California
Theme:
Education, Teacher Credentialing
Document Type:
Program Standards
Agency:
Commission on Teacher Credentialing
Author:
Commission on Teacher Credentialing
Target Audience:
Teacher candidates, educators, educational institutions
Effective Period:
Ongoing, with updates as of July 2024
Approval Date:
December 2015
Revision Date:
July 2024
Note:
Year
Year:
2024
Region / City:
South Yorkshire
Topic:
Fair assessment in practice education
Document Type:
Guideline
Organization:
South Yorkshire Teaching Partnership (SYTP)
Author:
Social Work England (SWE)
Target Audience:
Practice educators in social work education
Effective Period:
2024
Approval Date:
23/04/2024
Modification Date:
Not specified