№ files_lp_4_process_3_090410
File format: docx
Character count: 6816
File size: 31 KB
Structured checklist for ensuring comprehensive reporting of qualitative research interviews and focus groups with detailed items covering research team, methodology, data collection, analysis, and reporting of findings.
Year:
2007
Journal:
International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume:
19
Issue:
6
Pages:
349–357
Authors:
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J
Type of document:
Checklist / Reporting guideline
Field:
Qualitative research in health care
Target audience:
Researchers conducting interviews and focus groups
Methodological approach:
Thematic content analysis
Participants:
Health care providers, FCHVs, local leaders
Sample size:
15
Data collection:
Face-to-face interviews, audio recording, field notes
Coding:
Two authors, coding tree in MS Excel
Ethical considerations:
Informed consent obtained from participants
Publication context:
Reporting standard for qualitative research studies
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2007
Region / City:
International
Topic:
Qualitative research reporting
Document type:
Checklist
Organization / Institution:
International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Author:
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J
Target audience:
Researchers conducting qualitative studies
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
Year:
2007
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Healthcare, Nursing, Research
Document Type:
Research article
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J
Target Audience:
Researchers, Healthcare professionals
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Topic:
Qualitative research, COREQ checklist, reflexivity, thematic analysis
Document type:
Research methodology guidelines
Author:
CP, SD, DOL, TMc, PB, MOD, AMc, ER
Target audience:
Researchers, academicians, and practitioners in qualitative research
Year:
2007
Region / City:
International
Topic:
Qualitative research reporting
Document type:
Checklist
Organization / Institution:
International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Author:
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J
Target audience:
Researchers conducting qualitative studies
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
Year:
2007
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Healthcare, Nursing, Research
Document Type:
Research article
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J
Target Audience:
Researchers, Healthcare professionals
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Rwanda
Topic:
Qualitative research methodology, health studies
Document type:
Research checklist
Organization / Institution:
University of Rwanda, Health Development Initiative
Author:
LR, AF, KF, EN, MMK, RM, ET, OH, DK, FM
Target Audience:
Researchers in health and social sciences, academic institutions
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Amsterdam
Topic:
Research methodology
Document type:
Supplementary material
Institution:
Amsterdam University Medical Center
Authors:
Caroline Bolling, Jesse van der Zande, Pablo Stegerhoek, Herman IJzerman, Evert Verhagen, Paul Kuijer
Target audience:
Researchers in qualitative research, academic institutions
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Modification date:
N/A
Contextual description:
A supplementary document outlining the COREQ checklist for qualitative research, including interviewer characteristics, study design, participant selection, and data analysis procedures.
Note:
Year
Topic:
Qualitative research, COREQ checklist, reflexivity, thematic analysis
Document type:
Research methodology guidelines
Author:
CP, SD, DOL, TMc, PB, MOD, AMc, ER
Target audience:
Researchers, academicians, and practitioners in qualitative research
Year:
20--
Region / City:
Georgia
Subject:
Request for Qualifications, Design-Build Services
Document Type:
Request for Proposals
Institution / Organization:
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
Author:
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
Target Audience:
Contractors, Design-Build Firms
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Subject:
Implementation of online support tools for relatives of people with bipolar disorder and psychosis
Document type:
Participant information sheet
Organization / institution:
Lancaster University, University College London, University of Liverpool, NHS Trusts
Author:
IMPART research team
Target audience:
Relatives of patients receiving NHS mental health support
Funding:
National Institute of Health Research (NIHR)
Ethics approval:
NHS Research Ethics Committee
Duration:
Three-year study
Method:
Interviews, audio-recorded with transcription and anonymization
Purpose:
To understand barriers, facilitators, and success factors in the implementation of the REACT toolkit
Data usage:
Inform national implementation plan, academic publication, conference presentation
Author:
Simon Moss
Institution:
Charles Darwin University (CDU), Menzies School of Health Research
Type of document:
Research ethics application sample
Target audience:
Research students
Research methods:
Semi-structured interviews, focus groups, narrative analysis
Participants:
International research students, adults, healthy community members
Locations:
Darwin, various participant-chosen locations
Number of participants:
Approximately 10–15 for interviews, 2–4 focus groups with 3–10 participants each
Analysis method:
Thematic analysis, constructivist grounded theory
Topics:
Experiences of international research students, evaluation of initiatives like the community wall
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Oxford
Subject:
Education, Admissions
Document Type:
Interview Guidelines
Institution:
University of Oxford
Authors:
Dalveen, Jessica Goodman, Tom Crawford, Matthew Williams, Hannah Skoda, Will Poole, Ian (Admissions Operations Team)
Target Audience:
Prospective Students
Period of Action:
2020
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
User experience research for health programme
Document Type:
Research protocol
Organization:
[Not specified in document]
Author:
[Not specified in document]
Target Audience:
Participants of user experience research study
Period of Validity:
[Not specified in document]
Approval Date:
[Not specified in document]
Amendment Date:
[Not specified in document]
Year:
2023
Region:
Richmond area; Hanover County, Virginia
Geographic scope:
City of Richmond and Hanover County
Subject matter:
Court administration; local court practices; professional conduct
Document type:
Committee report; interview summary
Issuing body:
Administration of Justice Committee
Related organizations:
Richmond Bar Association
Courts referenced:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division; Hanover Circuit Court; Hanover General District Court; Hanover Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court
Judges referenced:
J. Overton Harris; Hugh S. Campbell; David B. Caddell; Frank G. Uvanni
Intended audience:
Attorneys and members of the local bar
Time period covered:
Annual interviews conducted in 2023
Topics addressed:
Local rules and forms; continuances; scheduling practices; courtroom decorum; remote hearings; professional development; guardian ad litem practice
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Employee exit process, feedback collection
Document type:
Guide
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Line managers, HR personnel
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Institution / Organization:
University of Canterbury
Target Audience:
Participants in the research
Document type:
Technical guidance
Thematic area:
Humanitarian shelter and displacement
Methodology:
Focus Group Discussions and Key Informant Interviews
Target population:
Affected populations, IDPs, refugees, host communities
Geographic scope:
Humanitarian contexts
Institutional reference:
CRS
Referenced standard:
Sphere Standards
Referenced publication:
Focus Group Discussions – A Practical Guide (2018)
Assistance scope:
Emergency, transitional, and permanent shelter options
Source type:
Operational guidance document
Document type:
Participant information sheet
Consent type:
Verbal consent
Research context:
Academic research
Ethics review:
Faculty Research Ethics Committee
Intended use:
Supporting documentation for ethical review and approval
Applicable legislation:
General Data Protection Regulation
Data considerations:
Personal data and special category data
Research methods:
Brief interviews, observation, ethnographic methods
Institution referenced:
De Montfort University
Target audience:
Research participants
Status:
Template with researcher-completed sections
Contextual description:
Ethical guidance document outlining requirements and procedures for informing research participants and documenting verbal consent in academic studies involving brief interviews and related qualitative methods.
Document type:
Career guide
Topic:
Job search and interview preparation
Intended audience:
Job seekers and students entering the job market
Language:
English
Format:
Multi-page informational guide
Institutional context:
University career services
Key themes:
Company research, interview preparation, professional image, etiquette
Career stage:
Entry-level and early career
Content scope:
Pre-interview preparation and professional conduct
Time period referenced:
Contemporary job market practices