№ lp_2_3_31555
File format: docx
Character count: 9091
File size: 27 KB
This document outlines the process for transferring offenders to Extended Limits of Confinement (ELC) during the COVID-19 pandemic in North Carolina, specifying eligibility criteria, procedures, and restrictions.
Year:
2020
Region / City:
North Carolina
Subject:
Correctional policies during COVID-19 pandemic
Document Type:
Policy
Organization:
Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice
Author:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety
Target Audience:
Offenders eligible for Extended Limits of Confinement, correctional officers
Effective Period:
2020–2022
Approval Date:
8/19/2020
Amendment Date:
8/19/2020
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Global
Topic:
Nuclear Safety, Criticality Safety
Document Type:
Technical Proposal
Author:
TTEG-C
Target Audience:
Nuclear Regulatory Authorities, Safety Experts, Industry Professionals
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
1937
Region / City:
California
Theme:
Isolation, Social Injustice, Prejudice, Violence
Type of Document:
Literary Analysis
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Literary Scholars, Students, Readers of American Literature
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Issuing Agency:
County of Alameda
Department:
Alameda County Health (AC Health) – Behavioral Health Department
RFP Number:
ACH-900226
Project Title:
Evaluation Services for Alternatives to Confinement Project
Document Type:
Request for Proposal
Request Issued:
August 6, 2025
Bidders Conference Dates:
August 12, 2025; August 13, 2025
Written Questions Due:
August 14, 2025
Response Due Date:
September 10, 2025
Evaluation Period:
September 10, 2025 – October 9, 2025
Notice of Intent to Award:
October 10, 2025
Board Consideration Award Date:
December 16, 2025
Contract Start Date:
January 1, 2026
Contract Term:
January 1, 2026 – December 31, 2028
Contract Maximum Amount:
$259,000
Funding Source:
Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Innovation Funding
Contact Person:
Maria Smith
Contact Phone:
(510) 667-3033
Contact Email:
[email protected]
Submission Location:
1000 San Leandro Blvd, Suite 300, San Leandro, CA 94577
Subject Area:
Behavioral health, criminal justice diversion, program evaluation
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Oregon
Theme:
Water systems, Emergency response
Document type:
Template
Organization:
Drinking Water Services (DWS)
Author:
Drinking Water Services
Target audience:
Water system operators, managers, and staff
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
California
Topic:
Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS), Renewable Energy Credits (REC)
Document Type:
Guidance
Organization / Institution:
California Energy Commission (CEC)
Author:
California Energy Commission (CEC)
Target Audience:
Load Serving Entities (LSEs), Retail Sellers, Publicly Owned Electric Utilities (POU)
Effective Period:
2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
California
Topic:
Anti-SLAPP motions
Document type:
Legal guide
Organization / institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Legal professionals
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
Year:
2017
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Supported Living, Disability Services
Document Type:
Best Practice Checklist
Target Audience:
Support coordinators, supported living coaches, personal support providers
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Iowa
Topic:
English Language Learners, Education Plan
Document Type:
Educational Template
Organization / Institution:
Iowa School Districts
Author:
Iowa Department of Education
Target Audience:
K-12 School Districts
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Mid-Ohio Valley, West Virginia
Topic:
Workforce Development
Document Type:
Request for Proposal
Organization / Institution:
Workforce Development Board Mid-Ohio Valley (WDB-MOV)
Author:
Workforce Development Board Mid-Ohio Valley (WDB-MOV)
Target Audience:
Potential applicants for One-Stop Operator and Case Management positions
Effective Period:
2025-2026
Approval Date:
2025-04-28
Date of Changes:
None
Note:
Context
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Virginia
Theme:
Behavioral Health, Crisis Stabilization
Document Type:
Memorandum
Organ / Institution:
Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services
Author:
Nelson Smith
Target Audience:
Providers of Residential Crisis Stabilization Units
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
July 24, 2024
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Digital Circuit Design, Asynchronous Counters
Document Type:
Project/Design Specification
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students in Digital Electronics
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Massachusetts
Topic:
Youth Services, Disability Rights, Non-Discrimination
Document Type:
Policy and Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Massachusetts Department of Youth Services (DYS)
Author:
Massachusetts Department of Youth Services
Target Audience:
DYS staff, service providers, legal guardians, youth under DYS care
Period of Action:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Topic:
Health Insurance
Document Type:
Claim Form
Organization / Institution:
Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS)
Target Audience:
Serving Employees
Context:
A claim form used by employees of the Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS) to apply for medical reimbursement for various treatments and procedures.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
California
Topic:
Lead and Copper Monitoring
Document Type:
Guidance
Organization:
State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water
Author:
State Water Resources Control Board
Target Audience:
Water system operators serving less than 50,000 people
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Revisions:
Not specified
Year:
2016
Region / city:
United States and Canada
Topic:
Chaplaincy Ministry
Document type:
Church Policy
Organization / institution:
Christian Reformed Church in North America
Author:
Director of Chaplaincy and Care Ministry
Target audience:
Prospective and current chaplains, calling churches
Period of validity:
Ongoing process of endorsement
Approval date:
March 2016
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2019
Region / City:
De Forest, Wisconsin
Topic:
Floating RCACs, Independent Living, Residential Care Apartments
Document Type:
Summary
Organization:
LeadingAge Wisconsin
Author:
Jim Williams, Director of Member Enrichment, LeadingAge Wisconsin
Target Audience:
Members of LeadingAge Wisconsin
Period of Action:
March 20, 2019
Date of Approval:
March 20, 2019
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
Summary of a discussion about floating RCACs and serving independent residents in an RCAC setting, including legal and regulatory considerations.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Massachusetts
Topic:
LGBTQ Youth and Young Adults, Substance Abuse, Family Rejection, Mental Health
Document Type:
Practice Guidance
Institution:
BSAS (Bureau of Substance Addiction Services)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Healthcare providers, substance abuse treatment programs, LGBTQ community
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Contextual Description:
Guidance document outlining best practices for serving LGBTQ youth and young adults in substance abuse treatment programs, emphasizing the need for cultural competence, safety, and family engagement.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters