№ lp_2_3_20931
File format: docx
Character count: 6114
File size: 26 KB
Procurement notice issued by a California regional center outlining requirements, qualifications, scope of services, submission procedures, and timeline for proposals to provide American Sign Language training and support services for individuals with developmental disabilities and related stakeholders.
Issuing Organization:
Westside Regional Center (WRC)
Document Type:
Request for Proposals (RFP)
Service Code:
644
Date Issued:
August 1, 2025
Proposal Submission Deadline:
August 15, 2025 at 5:00 PM PT
Orientation Date:
August 11, 2025 2:00–3:00 PM PT
Region:
California
Contact Person:
Elaine Wright-Forris
Contact Title:
Deaf & Hoh Communications Specialist
Submission Method:
Email
Projected Start of Services:
September 1, 2025
Target Population:
Individuals who are Deaf and Hard of Hearing with developmental disabilities, their families, and service providers
Scope of Services:
ASL instruction, one-on-one support, consultation, technical assistance, and documentation
Minimum Qualifications:
Accredited ASL proficiency, experience in Deaf education, knowledge of Deaf culture, compliance with vendor requirements
Procurement Timeline:
August 1, 2025 – September 1, 2025
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Institution:
University of Connecticut
Laboratory:
Sign Linguistics and Language Acquisition Lab
Principal Investigator:
Diane Lillo-Martin
Document type:
Coding guide
Subject area:
American Sign Language linguistics
Focus:
Syntactic unit segmentation and MLU calculation
Methodology:
Transcription and annotation guidelines
Measures referenced:
ASL MLU, ASL-IPSyn
Intended use:
Linguistic analysis of child ASL data
Status:
Working guidelines
Referenced resources:
ASL SignBank, CHAT manual
Discipline:
Language acquisition research
Research context:
Analysis of syntactic complexity in ASL
Organization:
United Methodist Committee on Deaf and Hard of Hearing Ministries
Document type:
Newsletter
Topic:
Deaf ministry, sign language education, interpreted church services
Religious tradition:
United Methodist Church
Key subjects:
American Sign Language tutoring, Deaf awareness, conflict mediation in ministry, interpreting resources, congregational accessibility
People mentioned:
Rev. Tom Hudspeth; Rev. Leo Yates, Jr.
Communication format:
Online tutoring via Zoom, FaceTime, or Skype
Audience:
United Methodist churches and ministry leaders
Geographic scope:
United States
Referenced materials:
ASL Pro: Religious Signs; Interpreting at Church: A Paradigm for Sign Language Interpreters, 4th Edition; ASL Bible; The Interpreter’s Friend; The ASL Glossary (The United Methodist Church); Start ASL; Deaf Ministry: Ministry Models for Expanding the Kingdom of God, 2nd Edition
Contact information:
[email protected]
Religious references:
Matthew 5:23–24; Matthew 6:14–15
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Owens Community College, Kent State University
Subject:
American Sign Language/English Interpreting
Document Type:
Course Sequence
Institution:
Owens Community College, Kent State University
Author:
Owens Community College, Kent State University Academic Partnerships
Target Audience:
Students pursuing ASL Interpreter programs
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Date of Approval:
January 2026
Date of Changes:
January 2026
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Minnesota
Topic:
ASL Interpreter Listings
Document Type:
Directory
Organization:
Minnesota Access Alliance
Author:
Minnesota Access Alliance
Target Audience:
General public, individuals seeking ASL interpreters
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Revision Date:
N/A
Context:
A directory listing various Minnesota-based ASL interpreters by category, including theatre, music, dance, and more, with contact information and qualifications.
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Virginia
Subject:
Interpreter Services, Sign Language, Government Agencies
Document Type:
Manual, Agreement
Organization:
Virginia Department for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing
Target Audience:
Qualified Sign Language Interpreters, State and Local Government Agencies
Effective Date:
January 1, 2020
Date of Approval:
January 1, 2020
Date of Last Update:
January 1, 2020
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Burlington
Subject:
Signage Regulations
Document Type:
Application Form
Authority / Institution:
Burlington City Government
Target Audience:
Property owners, contractors, and individuals applying for sign permits
Program name:
Ashland Sign & Façade Program
Document type:
Application form
Grant type:
Reimbursement grant
Administering organization:
Town of Ashland
Administering program:
Ashland Economic Development Incentive Program
Location:
Ashland, Massachusetts
Eligible applicants:
Businesses located in Ashland
Eligible improvements:
Exterior façade and sign improvements
Maximum funding amount:
Up to 50% of project cost or $5,000
Funding source:
Town funding
Approval authority:
Ashland Economic Development Advisory Group; Town Manager; Board of Selectmen
Submission requirements:
Completed application, bids, permits, supporting documents
Contact person:
Economic Development Director
Contact address:
101 Main Street, Ashland, MA 01721
Contact email:
[email protected]
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Indiana
Subject:
World Languages
Document Type:
Academic Standards
Institution:
Indiana Department of Education
Author:
Indiana Department of Education
Target Audience:
Teachers, School Administrators, Curriculum Planners
Period of Application:
Kindergarten to Grade 12
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Revisions:
2019
Year:
2016
Region / City:
London
Topic:
Traffic Sign Illumination Research
Document Type:
Invitation to Tender
Organization:
Transport for London (TfL)
Author:
Transport for London (TfL)
Target Audience:
Research firms, Tenderers
Period of Activity:
February 2016
Approval Date:
February 2016
Modification Date:
N/A
Note:
Year
Organization / institution:
Beykent University
Target audience:
Students of Beykent University
Description:
Guide for signing up for Zoom and joining an exam class for the ERASMUS+ SPEAKING EXAM at Beykent University.
Note:
Year
Note:
Year
Year:
N/A
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Language development, Multilingualism, Early Childhood Education
Document Type:
Educational Module
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Educators, students, parents
Duration:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Note:
Year
Subject:
Laser Safety
Document Type:
Instruction Manual
Year:
2023
Location:
Luxembourg / Madrid, Spain
Topic:
Renewable energy financing
Document type:
Press release
Organizations:
Endesa, Instituto de Crédito Oficial (ICO), European Investment Bank (EIB)
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Investors, stakeholders, general public
Scope:
Spain
Financing amount:
€500 million
Loan structure:
€300 million ICO, €200 million EIB
Projects:
Solar photovoltaic plants and wind farms
Emission target:
Scope 1 greenhouse gas reduction to below 145 g CO2eq/kWh by 2025
Strategic plan period:
2023–2025
Certification:
AENOR
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Australia
Subject:
Road Signs Installation
Document Type:
Technical Specification
Organization / Institution:
Department of Transport
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Contractors, Engineers
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
December 2018
Modification Date:
Not specified