№ lp_1_2_25487
File format: docx
Character count: 41653
File size: 64 KB
Guidance on completing NCOERs and OERs within the EES system, including rules for bullet comments, rating profiles, and the use of PDF-F forms for evaluations.
Year:
2016
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
Military evaluations, NCOER, OER, rating systems
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Army
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Military personnel involved in evaluations
Validity period:
Ongoing
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2023
Region / City:
N/A
Subject:
Change Request
Document Type:
Change Request
Organization:
RECCo
Author:
Jonny Moore
Target Audience:
Programme Participants
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
06/07/2023
Change Date:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
MHHS Design Updates
Document Type:
Change Request
Organization:
RECCo
Author:
Jonny Moore
Target Audience:
Programme Participants
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
06/07/2023
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Coventry
Subject:
Higher Education, Academic Examination
Document Type:
Job Description
Organization:
Coventry University
Author:
Coventry University
Target Audience:
External Examiners, Academic Staff
Period of Activity:
4 years
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Program:
Credential Validation Service (CVS)
Tematika:
Program curriculum mapping
Jenis dokumen:
Curriculum mapping form
Komponen kurikulum:
Vocational Learning Outcomes (VLO)
Komponen keterampilan:
Essential Employability Skills (EES)
Struktur dokumen:
Course listing, outcomes alignment table, employability skills categories
Elemen yang dipetakan:
Course code, course title, course hours, course description
Kategori keterampilan:
Communication, Numeracy, Critical Thinking & Problem Solving, Information Management, Inter-personal, Personal
Tujuan pemetaan:
Alignment of courses with program learning outcomes and employability skills
Pengguna yang dituju:
Program curriculum developers and academic staff
Metode pemetaan:
Course-to-outcome alignment using matrix with marked indicators
Year:
2023
Author:
Elizabeth Dow, Pharm.D., BCPS, BCOP & Nick Messinger, Pharm.D., BCPS, BCACP
Target Audience:
Job seekers in the pharmaceutical field
Document Type:
Guide
Organization:
N/A
Keywords:
cover letter, job application, pharmaceutical, job description, qualifications, career
Context:
A guide offering practical tips on writing a cover letter for job applications in the pharmaceutical industry.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
Accessibility, QR Codes, Technology, Digital Inclusion
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
NaviLens, Zapvision
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Businesses, designers, public sector
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Contextual Description:
A guide outlining how to create accessible QR codes that can be used by people with visual or dexterity impairments in various environments.
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Europe
Topic:
Travel preparation
Document type:
Travel guide
Organization / institution:
EuroSportsTravel
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Hockey players and families
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Context:
Practical advice for preparing for a European hockey tournament, including travel and packing tips, safety, and important documentation for travelers.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
USA
Subject:
Animal Welfare, Laboratory Animal Research
Document Type:
Presentation
Organization:
NIH Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW)
Author:
Cate Pritchard, Dr. Jacquelyn Tubbs, Dr. Brent Morse
Target Audience:
Research professionals, veterinarians, animal care personnel
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Document management, File naming conventions, Legal filings
Document type:
Guide
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Legal professionals, staff involved in document submission
Effective date:
2-13-2020
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Topic:
Career guidance, Education
Document type:
Guide
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Young people, Teachers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Context description
Year:
2023
Region / City:
New York
Topic:
PROS CAIRS Revision, Program Transition
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Office of Mental Health (OMH)
Author:
Kelly Housler
Target Audience:
PROS staff, administrative and clinical
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
2023
Date of Changes:
2023
Context:
Guidelines for PROS programs on transitioning to the new PROS CAIRS system, including tips, training webinars, and process changes.
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Business communication, writing tips
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Professionals engaged in business communication
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Year:
2023
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Technology, IT Support
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
Dominion Energy
Target Audience:
Users of Dominion Energy’s QPTM and QQM systems
Date of Changes:
3.21.2023
Document type:
Application guidance
Program:
Abandoned Mine Land Economic Revitalization (AMLER)
Issuing organization:
Virginia Department of Energy
Related federal authority:
Office of Surface Mining Regulation and Enforcement
Jurisdiction:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Submission format:
Electronic
Compliance requirements:
2 CFR Part 200; Virginia Public Procurement Act; Endangered Species Act; Build America, Buy America Act
Intended recipients:
AMLER funding applicants
Contact person:
Tim Ferguson, AMLER Senior Project Specialist
Subject matter:
Funding application preparation, eligibility, budgeting, and reporting
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Stony Brook, New York
Topic:
Pre-registration, Research Methods, Psychology
Document type:
Template, Guidelines
Institution:
Stony Brook University
Author:
Mallory L. Dobias
Target audience:
Researchers, Psychology Students, Academics
Effective date:
2021
Date of last update:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Theme:
Accessibility
Document Type:
Guide
Organization:
USDA
Contextual description:
Guide for creating accessible documents ensuring compliance with accessibility standards, particularly for individuals with disabilities.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Disaster Relief, Food Preparation
Document Type:
Guidebook
Author:
Southern Baptist Disaster Relief
Target Audience:
Disaster relief volunteers
Effective Period:
May 2023 and updated bi-annually
Approval Date:
May 2023
Date of Changes:
May 2023
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
Neonatology, Medical Education
Document Type:
Feature Article
Institution / Organization:
Monash University, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The Royal Children’s Hospital
Authors:
Karanjeet CHAUHAN, Simone HUNTINGFORD, Sineth WICKRAMAARACHCHI, Mustafa SIDDIQUI
Target Audience:
Medical Students, Clinical Educators
Period of Effect:
2022
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified