№ lp_1_2_66173
File format: docx
Character count: 5337
File size: 22 KB
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Coventry
Subject:
Higher Education, Academic Examination
Document Type:
Job Description
Organization:
Coventry University
Author:
Coventry University
Target Audience:
External Examiners, Academic Staff
Period of Activity:
4 years
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2023
Region / City:
N/A
Subject:
Change Request
Document Type:
Change Request
Organization:
RECCo
Author:
Jonny Moore
Target Audience:
Programme Participants
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
06/07/2023
Change Date:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
MHHS Design Updates
Document Type:
Change Request
Organization:
RECCo
Author:
Jonny Moore
Target Audience:
Programme Participants
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
06/07/2023
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2016
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
Military evaluations, NCOER, OER, rating systems
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Army
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Military personnel involved in evaluations
Validity period:
Ongoing
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Program:
Credential Validation Service (CVS)
Tematika:
Program curriculum mapping
Jenis dokumen:
Curriculum mapping form
Komponen kurikulum:
Vocational Learning Outcomes (VLO)
Komponen keterampilan:
Essential Employability Skills (EES)
Struktur dokumen:
Course listing, outcomes alignment table, employability skills categories
Elemen yang dipetakan:
Course code, course title, course hours, course description
Kategori keterampilan:
Communication, Numeracy, Critical Thinking & Problem Solving, Information Management, Inter-personal, Personal
Tujuan pemetaan:
Alignment of courses with program learning outcomes and employability skills
Pengguna yang dituju:
Program curriculum developers and academic staff
Metode pemetaan:
Course-to-outcome alignment using matrix with marked indicators
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Not specified
Theme:
Education, Assessment
Document Type:
Guide
Institution:
University
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Students
Validity period:
Not specified
Approval date:
October 2024
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization / Institution:
Board of Examiners
Note:
Year
Organization / Institution:
University of Western Ontario
Target Audience:
External Examiners
Year:
2026
Region / City:
San Francisco
Subject:
Street Art and Crafts Licensing
Document Type:
Meeting Minutes
Organization:
Street Artists and Crafts Examiners Advisory Committee
Author:
Kingsley Sun (Program Associate)
Target Audience:
Art vendors, street artists, committee members, general public
Period of Action:
January 7, 2026
Approval Date:
January 7, 2026
Amendment Date:
N/A
Context:
Meeting minutes documenting the review and approval of new street artists and additional crafts under the Street Artist Ordinance.
Note:
Year
Context description:
Form for nominating thesis examiners by students in higher degree research programs at UTS.
Year:
2023
Region / city:
London
Topic:
PhD examination fees and expenses
Document type:
Form
Organization / institution:
LSE PhD Academy
Author:
LSE PhD Academy
Target audience:
Examiners of PhD candidates
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
January 2023
Amendment date:
January 2023
Description:
This is a form detailing the fees and reimbursable expenses for examiners participating in PhD examinations at the London School of Economics.
Jurisdiction:
State of Louisiana
Subject:
Regulation of river and steamship pilots
Type of document:
Administrative code table of contents
Governing bodies:
Board of Examiners of Bar Pilots for the Port of New Orleans; Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners; Board of Examiners for the New Orleans and Baton Rouge Steamship Pilots; Louisiana Pilotage Fee Commission
Geographic scope:
Port of New Orleans; Baton Rouge; Calcasieu River Waterway
Content coverage:
Licensing; qualifications; apprenticeship; standards of conduct; drug and alcohol policy; investigations and enforcement; hearings and procedures; pilotage fees
Structure:
Subparts and chapters with numbered sections (§101–§12702)
Regulated activities:
Pilotage services; vessel operations; administrative proceedings
Year:
2023
Region / city:
London
Topic:
e-Submission, External Examiners, Moodle, Turnitin
Document type:
Guidance
Institution:
University of East London
Author:
University of East London
Target audience:
External Examiners
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Organization:
Maryland Board of Social Work Examiners
Department:
Maryland Department of Health
Address:
4201 Patterson Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21215
Phone Number:
410-764-4788
Toll Free:
1-877-526-2541
Fax:
410-358-2469
Website:
http://www.health.maryland.gov/bswe
Document Type:
Complaint information sheet, complaint form, and authorization for release of information
Subject:
Filing and processing of complaints against licensed social workers in Maryland
Regulatory Authority:
Maryland Board of Social Work Examiners
Meeting Schedule:
Disciplinary Complaint Review Committee meets the 2th Friday of every month; Full Board meets the 2nd Friday of the month
Related Regulation:
42 CFR Part 2
Jurisdiction:
State of Maryland
Institution:
University of Peradeniya
Faculty:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine & Animal Science
Unit:
Veterinary Postgraduate Education Unit
Document Type:
Administrative form
Purpose:
Examiners appointment and thesis submission
Related Degree:
Postgraduate degree
Fields Included:
Candidate details, Supervisors, Mode of study, Tentative abstract, Research outputs, Suggested examiners, Conflict of interest declaration
Approval Body:
Higher Degrees Committee
Signatories:
Candidate, Principal supervisor, Co-supervisors, Coordinator/VPEU
Internal Use Sections:
For office use only
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Wales
Subject:
Education
Document Type:
Role Profile
Organization / Institution:
WJEC
Author:
Kathryn Rees
Target Audience:
Potential candidates for Principal Examiner
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Europe
Topic:
Aviation Training
Document Type:
User Guide
Author:
Omar Elkhartoufi
Target Audience:
Maintenance Training Organizations, Aviation Instructors
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
15/11/2023
Date of Revision:
15/11/2023
Document Title:
External Examiner Report
Institution:
Aston University
Related Regulatory Body:
Office for Students
Document Type:
Annual external examiner report form
Purpose:
Reporting on academic standards, assessment processes, and programme quality
Submission Method:
Electronic submission via email
Submission Deadline:
Within one month of the relevant Board of Examiners meeting
Fee Payment Terms:
Within 2 months of reports received by the 25th of the month
Confidentiality Requirement:
Compliance with Data Protection Policies
Sections Included:
Examiner details; Programme and module information; Experience of role; Board of Examiners meeting; Curriculum; Academic standards; Information received; Assessment; End Point Assessment (if applicable)
Applicable Programmes:
Example 1; Example 2; Example 3
Programme Awards and Codes:
BSC EXAM1; BSC EXAM2; BSC EXAM3
Modules Listed:
Example Module 1; Example Module 2; Example Module 3
Partner Institution:
Teaching Partner Institution
Examiner Name:
Dr AN Examiner
Examiner Affiliation:
Another University
Jurisdiction:
United Kingdom Higher Education