№ files_lp_4_process_1_49029
File format: docx
Character count: 5075
File size: 40 KB
Procedures for Shared Lives arrangements detailing the matching and introduction process, including criteria for selecting carers, steps for introductory meetings, and emergency protocols to ensure safe and compatible placements.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Nottinghamshire
Topic:
Social Care
Document Type:
Policy
Approved by:
Janine Vardy
Author:
Helen Hall
Responsible Team:
Shared Lives
Contact Number:
0115 8043064
Contact Email:
[email protected]
Version:
2
Date Approved:
07/04/2021
Proposed Review Date:
07/04/2022
Subject Areas:
Older people, Social Care, Children and Families
Supporting Documents:
Assessment of Shared Lives carers, Individual support plans
Review History:
25/11/2020, amendments/typos by Author
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Title:
Vocabulary: Introductions to Disadvantages (1/2–2/2)
Document Type:
Educational handout
Subject:
Debate terminology and argumentation theory
Topic:
Disadvantages and argumentative strategies in policy debate
Intended Audience:
Debate students
Structure:
Two-part vocabulary list with definitions
Key Concepts:
Disadvantage, Impact, Link, Uniqueness, Impact calculus, Turns, Status Quo
Number of Sections:
2
Year:
2020
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Urban Geography, Academic Journals
Document Type:
Journal Editorial
Organization / Institution:
Urban Geography Journal
Author:
Kevin Ward, Thomas J Cooke
Target Audience:
Scholars and Academics in Urban Geography
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Last Revision:
N/A
Date:
April 3, 2024
Time:
11:30am–1:20pm
Location:
Pappalardo Room, #4-349
Organizing Body:
Physics Department
Event Type:
Departmental Welcome and Orientation Session
Participants:
Department Leadership, Academic Team, Research Division Heads, Graduate Admissions Chair, Graduate Student Leaders
Department Head:
Deepto Chakrabarty
Associate Department Head:
Lindley Winslow
Graduate Academic Faculty Coordinator:
Will Detmold
Academic Administrator:
Shannon Larkin
Graduate Academic and Admissions Coordinator:
Sydney Miller
Research Divisions:
ASTRO; NUPAT; NUPAX; ABCP
Graduate Student Organizations:
PGSC; PhysREFS; Physics GAGA; PhysGAAP; PVC; GWIP; NSBP Chapter; Graduate Student Union
Audience:
Graduate students and visitors
Agenda Items:
Welcome remarks; Introductions; Division presentations; Student organization presentations; Questions; Research area visits
Year:
1937
Region:
United States
Theme:
American Dream, Friendship, Isolation, Racism
Document Type:
Novel excerpt
Author:
John Steinbeck
Target Audience:
Adult readers
Characters:
George, Lennie, Candy, Crooks, Curley’s wife, Slim, Curley
Setting:
Ranches in California during the Great Depression
Narrative Focus:
Relationship between George and Lennie, social hierarchies, loneliness, and moral choices
Period Covered:
Early chapters of the novel
Literary Style:
Realism, naturalistic description, dialogue-driven characterization
Year:
N/A
Region / City:
N/A
Topic:
Computer Basics
Document Type:
Educational Material
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Beginners in computer literacy
Effective Period:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Organization:
SoftChalk
Associated Organization:
Quality Matters
Document Type:
Webinar follow-up email
Topic:
Online course design and quality standards in online learning
Event Type:
Innovators in Online Learning webinar
Recipient:
Webinar attendee
Contact Person:
Jillian Jevack
Contact Organization:
Quality Matters
Related Website:
http://qualitymatters.org
Archive Link:
http://softchalk.com/learn-more/innovators#innovator-archives
Additional Resources:
SoftChalk online tutorials, webinars, sample lessons, and SoftChalk Cloud trial
Contact Email:
[email protected]
Contact Phone:
(877) 638-2425 ext. 001
Website:
http://www.softchalk.com
Organisation:
Canberra Health Services
Document type:
Procedure
Document code:
CHS24/603
Scope:
Canberra Health Services Network
Applicable settings:
Inpatient, outpatient, emergency and community services
Subject:
Patient identification and health care activity matching
Standards referenced:
National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards (Actions 6.05 and 6.06)
Target audience:
CHS staff, visiting medical officers, agency staff, supervised health care students
Patient groups:
Adults, children, infants, neonates
Related systems:
Clinical records, incident management, medication administration, pathology services
Source type:
Institutional clinical procedure
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Arizona
Topic:
Character education funding
Document Type:
Grant instructions
Organization / Institution:
Arizona Department of Education
Author:
Arizona Department of Education
Target Audience:
Local Education Agencies, schools
Period of validity:
2023-2024
Approval Date:
March 1, 2023
Amendment Date:
April 15, 2023
Year:
2026
Region:
Arizona, USA
Type of Document:
Grant guidelines
Issuing Organization:
Arizona Department of Education
Legal Basis:
Arizona Revised Statute (A.R.S.) 15-154.01; A.R.S. 15-719
Target Audience:
Public schools, Local Education Agencies (LEAs)
Application Deadline:
April 15, 2026
Program Duration:
Up to three years with continuation approval
Funding Type:
Matching grant for character education training
Required Components:
Grant contact information, signed statement of assurances, school budget, matching funds itemization, program narrative responses
Evaluation Method:
Technical evaluation team, program evaluation, pre-course and post-course surveys of parents, teachers, and students
Contact:
Mila Makal, [email protected]
Note:
, (520) 770-3177
Note:
Year
Topic:
String Matching, Web Technologies, Unicode
Document Type:
Standard
Organization:
W3C
Target Audience:
Authors of specifications, software developers, content developers
Note:
Year
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Indiana
Topic:
Local road and bridge funding
Document Type:
Guidance Document
Organ / Institution:
INDOT
Author:
Indiana Department of Transportation
Target Audience:
Local government agencies, city and town officials, county governments
Period of Action:
2026 Fiscal Year
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Maximum Award:
$1,000,000
Eligibility:
All Indiana city, town, and county governments
Application Deadline:
October 31, 2025
Required Documents:
Asset Management Plan, project scope
Grant Fund Type:
Matching Grant
Maximum CCMG Cap:
$100 million per fiscal year
Project Types:
Road and bridge preservation, ADA compliance, drainage work, gravel road conversion
Exclusions:
Land purchasing, utility relocation, railroad upgrades, etc.
Note:
Context
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Indiana
Theme:
Road and bridge improvement
Document type:
Grant Program Guidelines
Agency:
INDOT (Indiana Department of Transportation)
Target audience:
Local governments in Indiana
Effective period:
January 2, 2025 – January 31, 2025
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Organization / Institution:
Bank of England
Target Audience:
Practitioners, Firms
Year:
2023-24
Region / City:
Nampa, Idaho
Theme:
Scholarships, Education
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization:
Nampa First Church of the Nazarene
Author:
Nampa First Church of the Nazarene
Target Audience:
NNU students, members of Nampa First Church
Period of Action:
Fall and Spring Semesters of the 2023-24 school year
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Document type:
Guidance document
Topic:
Grant matching funds and cost sharing
Grant program:
Resilient Food Systems Infrastructure Grant (RFSI)
Funding type:
Federal grant
Matching requirement:
50% standard match; 25% reduced match for qualifying applicants
Eligible match types:
Cash; In-kind
Eligible applicants:
Infrastructure Grant applicants; underserved farmers and ranchers; qualifying small businesses
Cost share basis:
Project costs
Geographic scope:
United States
Issuing context:
Federal grant administration
Primary audience:
Grant applicants
Content focus:
Definitions, eligibility rules, documentation requirements
Timeframe referenced:
Project period
Administrative references:
SBA small disadvantaged, women-owned, veteran-owned small business categories
Year:
2022
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
Grant Program Requirements
Document Type:
Program Application Guidance
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Department of Education
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Grantees and applicants for education-related grant programs
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Context:
This is a guidance document outlining the cost-share and matching fund requirements for several U.S. education grant programs.
Note:
Year
Theme:
Retirement plans
Document type:
Instructions
Organization / institution:
IRS
Target audience:
Employers, Plan Administrators
Document type:
Supplementary material
Subject:
CT radiomics analysis of ground-glass nodules (GGNs)
Imaging modality:
Computed tomography (CT)
Slice thickness:
3 mm; 1 mm
Study groups:
Benign GGNs (n = 23); Malignant GGNs (n = 92); Adenocarcinoma group (n = 92; n = 54 for 1 mm CT)
Statistical methods:
Propensity score matching; Logistic regression model; LASSO algorithm; 10-fold cross-validation; ROC analysis; Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
Matching ratio:
1:4
C-statistic:
0.7261
Matching method:
Greed matching within specified caliper distances
Distance metric:
0.7
Use of replacement:
With replacement
Feature categories:
Conventional indices; First order features; Second order features (GLCM, GLRLM, NGLDM, GLZLM)
Outcome measures:
AUC value; Rad-score; P-values for texture feature comparison