№ files_lp_4_process_2_45944
File format: docx
Character count: 7451
File size: 34 KB
Official district procedure outlining protocols for conducting interviews and interrogations of students on school premises, specifying roles of staff, law enforcement, and parents/guardians, including consent and notification requirements.
Year:
2025
Jurisdiction:
Washington State
Subject:
Student Interviews and Interrogations
Document Type:
Policy / Procedure
Institution:
School District
Author:
School District Administration
Target Audience:
School staff, law enforcement, health officials, parents/guardians
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Adoption Date:
12.15.25
Revision Notes:
Updated procedures for student interviews and parental notification
Relevant Legislation:
FERPA, Washington State law, ICE/HSI regulations
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2019
Jurisdiction:
Vermont; United States District Court; Massachusetts
Region:
Vermont; United States; Massachusetts
Subject:
Police interrogation practices; false evidence claims; voluntariness of confessions
Document Type:
Case law summary
Courts:
Supreme Court of Vermont; US District Court; Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Cases Cited:
State v. Kolts; Anderson v. Vannoy, Warden; Commonwealth v. Gallett
Legal Issue:
Admissibility of confessions obtained after misrepresentation of evidence
Procedural Posture:
Appeals from convictions and motions to suppress
Rights Referenced:
Miranda warnings; waiver of rights
Key Factors Considered:
Custody status; coercion; promises of leniency; use of false evidence; video recording of interrogation
Year:
20--
Region / City:
Georgia
Subject:
Request for Qualifications, Design-Build Services
Document Type:
Request for Proposals
Institution / Organization:
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
Author:
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
Target Audience:
Contractors, Design-Build Firms
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Subject:
Implementation of online support tools for relatives of people with bipolar disorder and psychosis
Document type:
Participant information sheet
Organization / institution:
Lancaster University, University College London, University of Liverpool, NHS Trusts
Author:
IMPART research team
Target audience:
Relatives of patients receiving NHS mental health support
Funding:
National Institute of Health Research (NIHR)
Ethics approval:
NHS Research Ethics Committee
Duration:
Three-year study
Method:
Interviews, audio-recorded with transcription and anonymization
Purpose:
To understand barriers, facilitators, and success factors in the implementation of the REACT toolkit
Data usage:
Inform national implementation plan, academic publication, conference presentation
Author:
Simon Moss
Institution:
Charles Darwin University (CDU), Menzies School of Health Research
Type of document:
Research ethics application sample
Target audience:
Research students
Research methods:
Semi-structured interviews, focus groups, narrative analysis
Participants:
International research students, adults, healthy community members
Locations:
Darwin, various participant-chosen locations
Number of participants:
Approximately 10–15 for interviews, 2–4 focus groups with 3–10 participants each
Analysis method:
Thematic analysis, constructivist grounded theory
Topics:
Experiences of international research students, evaluation of initiatives like the community wall
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Oxford
Subject:
Education, Admissions
Document Type:
Interview Guidelines
Institution:
University of Oxford
Authors:
Dalveen, Jessica Goodman, Tom Crawford, Matthew Williams, Hannah Skoda, Will Poole, Ian (Admissions Operations Team)
Target Audience:
Prospective Students
Period of Action:
2020
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
UK
Topic:
User experience research for health programme
Document Type:
Research protocol
Organization:
[Not specified in document]
Author:
[Not specified in document]
Target Audience:
Participants of user experience research study
Period of Validity:
[Not specified in document]
Approval Date:
[Not specified in document]
Amendment Date:
[Not specified in document]
Year:
2023
Region:
Richmond area; Hanover County, Virginia
Geographic scope:
City of Richmond and Hanover County
Subject matter:
Court administration; local court practices; professional conduct
Document type:
Committee report; interview summary
Issuing body:
Administration of Justice Committee
Related organizations:
Richmond Bar Association
Courts referenced:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division; Hanover Circuit Court; Hanover General District Court; Hanover Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court
Judges referenced:
J. Overton Harris; Hugh S. Campbell; David B. Caddell; Frank G. Uvanni
Intended audience:
Attorneys and members of the local bar
Time period covered:
Annual interviews conducted in 2023
Topics addressed:
Local rules and forms; continuances; scheduling practices; courtroom decorum; remote hearings; professional development; guardian ad litem practice
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Employee exit process, feedback collection
Document type:
Guide
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Line managers, HR personnel
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Institution / Organization:
University of Canterbury
Target Audience:
Participants in the research
Document type:
Technical guidance
Thematic area:
Humanitarian shelter and displacement
Methodology:
Focus Group Discussions and Key Informant Interviews
Target population:
Affected populations, IDPs, refugees, host communities
Geographic scope:
Humanitarian contexts
Institutional reference:
CRS
Referenced standard:
Sphere Standards
Referenced publication:
Focus Group Discussions – A Practical Guide (2018)
Assistance scope:
Emergency, transitional, and permanent shelter options
Source type:
Operational guidance document
Document type:
Participant information sheet
Consent type:
Verbal consent
Research context:
Academic research
Ethics review:
Faculty Research Ethics Committee
Intended use:
Supporting documentation for ethical review and approval
Applicable legislation:
General Data Protection Regulation
Data considerations:
Personal data and special category data
Research methods:
Brief interviews, observation, ethnographic methods
Institution referenced:
De Montfort University
Target audience:
Research participants
Status:
Template with researcher-completed sections
Contextual description:
Ethical guidance document outlining requirements and procedures for informing research participants and documenting verbal consent in academic studies involving brief interviews and related qualitative methods.
Document type:
Career guide
Topic:
Job search and interview preparation
Intended audience:
Job seekers and students entering the job market
Language:
English
Format:
Multi-page informational guide
Institutional context:
University career services
Key themes:
Company research, interview preparation, professional image, etiquette
Career stage:
Entry-level and early career
Content scope:
Pre-interview preparation and professional conduct
Time period referenced:
Contemporary job market practices
Year:
2017
Location:
Grady Health System
Topic:
Chlamydia Treatment, Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT)
Document Type:
Interview Guide
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Healthcare providers (MDs, RNs, APNs, residents, etc.)
Period of Application:
N/A
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Title:
Family Planning and COVID-19: Interviews from the Field, Part Three
Speaker:
Raissa Ameh, MSN, WHNP-BC
Host:
Katherine Atcheson
Organization:
National Clinical Training Center for Family Planning
Affiliated Institution:
Missouri Family Health Council
Funding Authority:
Office of Population Affairs
Program Type:
Podcast
Series:
The Family Planning Files
Duration:
00:15:01
Topic:
Family planning service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic
Geographic Focus:
Missouri, United States
Interview Date Reference:
March 23 (COVID-19 distancing restrictions effective date)
Public Health Context:
COVID-19 global pandemic
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Canada
Theme:
Memory sports, Canadian Memory Championship
Document Type:
Interview
Organization / Institution:
Canadian Memory Championship
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Memory sports enthusiasts, general public
Period of Validity:
N/A
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Petten, The Netherlands
Theme:
Clean Energy Supply Chains
Document Type:
Workshop Agenda
Organ / Institution:
Joint Research Centre (JRC), International Energy Agency (IEA)
Author:
EC-JRC, IEA-EGRD
Target Audience:
Researchers, Policy Makers, Industry Experts
Period of Validity:
27 – 28 November 2025
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Jurisdiction:
Victoria, Australia
Governing legislation:
Residential Tenancies Act 1997
Regulatory basis:
Residential Tenancies Regulations 2021, Regulation 21
Type of document:
Statutory notice form
Issuing authority:
Consumer Affairs Victoria
Related body:
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
Parties involved:
Residential rental provider; renter
Minimum notice period:
90 days
Rent increase frequency limit:
No more than once every 12 months
Fixed-term agreement condition:
Increase only if provided for in the agreement
Review mechanism:
Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria
Application timeframe for review:
Within 30 days of notice
Delivery methods:
Personal delivery; post; registered post; email with consent
Geographic scope:
State of Victoria
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
Food Safety Program
Document Type:
Template
Organization / Institution:
PrimeSafe
Author:
PrimeSafe
Target Audience:
Businesses in the retail meat sector
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
2025
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region/City:
Jammu
Topic:
Tender for Acquisition of Premises
Document Type:
Tender Document
Organization:
Jammu & Kashmir Bank
Author:
Jammu & Kashmir Bank Estates & General Department
Target Audience:
Bidders
Period of Validity:
120 days
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description