№ files_lp_4_process_2_76137
File format: docx
Character count: 1830
File size: 88 KB
This document is a worksheet designed to guide students through gear ratio calculations and their effects on speed and torque in a robot race and push scenario.
Year:
2023
Topic:
Robotics
Document Type:
Worksheet
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Education, Financial Flexibility
Document Type:
Official Letter
Organization / Institution:
United States Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education
Author:
Michelle Asha Cooper, Ph.D.
Target Audience:
GEAR UP Grantee Project Directors
Effective Period:
From March 13, 2020, to September 30, 2023
Approval Date:
July 27, 2022
Amendment Date:
None
Note:
Year
Topic:
Fisheries management
Document Type:
Report
Contextual description:
A report analyzing alternative management measures and gear modifications to reduce bycatch in the South West crab and lobster fishery.
Applicant:
State Council of Higher Education for Virginia
City/State:
Richmond, Virginia
Contact:
Erin McGrath, [email protected]
Note:
, (804) 274-8797
Project Goals:
Increase postsecondary preparedness and enrollment of low-income students, support Virginia Higher Education Plan
Objectives:
Academic performance improvement, high school graduation, postsecondary knowledge enhancement
Activities and Services:
Workshops, tutoring, mentoring, professional development, college visits, summer camps, FAFSA assistance, coding programs, scholarships, family engagement
Number of Students:
8,119 (Virginia), 17,595 (West Virginia), Pennsylvania cohort not specified
Target Schools:
Multiple middle and high schools across Virginia, West Virginia, Pennsylvania
Partners:
Local school districts, state educational agencies, nonprofits, national organizations, higher education institutions
Proposed Budget:
$24,693,732 over seven years (Virginia), WVGU funding Year One $3.5M
Performance Period:
84 months, 2021-2028
Evaluation:
Formative and data-driven assessment of academic growth, graduation rates, postsecondary enrollment and persistence
Year:
2021
Region / city:
United States
Subject:
Financial relief, COVID-19, GEAR UP program
Document type:
Letter
Organization / institution:
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education
Author:
Michelle Asha Cooper, Ph.D.
Target audience:
GEAR UP grantees, project directors
Period of validity:
Until September 30, 2022
Approval date:
March 25, 2021
Date of changes:
None
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Pope AAF, NC
Topic:
Extreme Cold Weather Gear
Document Type:
Product Specification
Organization / Institution:
Military
Target Audience:
Military Personnel
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Product Name:
Sentinel® Special Synthetic Gear Oils
Product Line:
S-GEAR OIL Series
Document Type:
Product Data Sheet
Product Category:
Synthetic Gear Lubricants
Formulation:
Molybdenum Sulfide Compounded
Application:
Enclosed Gear Mechanisms Including Spur, Herringbone, Spiral, Bevel and Hypoid Gears
Performance Standard:
FZG Stage 12+
ISO Viscosity Grades:
32, 46, 68, 100, 150, 220, 320, 460, 680
AGMA Lubricant Numbers:
1EP, 2EP, 3EP, 4EP, 5EP, 6EP, 7EP, 8EP
USDA Rating:
H-2
Appearance:
Dark Grey
Test Methods Referenced:
ASTM D2422, D445, D2270, D97, D92, D892, D1401, D2266, D130, D665A&B, D2509
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Marine machinery, steering gear inspection
Document type:
Technical check sheet
Organization / Institution:
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Marine Machinery & Equipment Co., Ltd.
Author:
S. Dobashi
Target Audience:
Technical personnel, engineers
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
2018-01-23
Date of modifications:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Year:
2013
Date:
September 30, 2013
Location:
Washington, D.C.
Format:
Webinar
Topic:
Leadership and management in Centers for Independent Living
Type of document:
Webinar transcript
Organizing program:
CIL-net
Organizing organizations:
ILRU; NCIL; APRIL
Supporting agency:
RSA, U.S. Department of Education
Host:
Tim Fuchs
Presenters:
Christy Dunaway; Robert Hand; Bill Henning; Lee Schulz
Participating organizations:
National Council on Independent Living; Life Centers for Independent Living; Resources for Independence of the Central Valley; Boston Center for Independent Living; Independence First
Intended audience:
Staff and leadership of Centers for Independent Living and SILCs
Subject focus:
Differences between management and leadership; leadership strategies; operational implications for CILs
Year:
2026
Region / City:
International
Topic:
Mechanical Engineering, Gear Systems
Document Type:
Course Syllabus
Organization:
American Gear Manufacturers Association (AGMA)
Instructor:
Raymond Drago, P.E.
Target Audience:
Gear and gearbox design engineers, management and quality control engineers
Course Duration:
Accelerated short course
Prerequisites:
Basic engineering knowledge in gear systems
Contact Email:
[email protected]
Required Textbook:
AGMA’s Reverse Gear System Engineering ― Why, When, How & What − (Avoiding Pitfalls …& Litigation!)
Course Objectives:
Understanding reverse engineering of gear systems, forensic analysis of gearbox failures, distinction between temporary replacement and duplication
Assessment:
Pre-test and post-test, immediate feedback, assignment review
Accommodation Contact:
Stephanie Smialek, [email protected], 773-302-8026
Course Modifications:
Instructor reserves the right to modify outline during course
Year:
2026
Region / States:
Georgia, Tennessee, North Carolina, and 11 other states along the Appalachian Trail
Topic:
Hiking, Outdoor Preparation
Document Type:
Guide / Checklist
Organization:
Appalachian Trail Conservancy references
Target Audience:
Prospective northbound thru-hikers
Trail Distance:
2,189 miles from Springer Mountain, GA to Katahdin, ME
Key Locations:
Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Neel’s Gap, Baxter State Park
Gear Focus:
Boots, socks, backpack, tent, stove, shelter
Preparation Period:
Weeks leading up to the hike
Weather Considerations:
Adjustments based on Knoxville, TN and Asheville, NC forecasts
Permits Required:
AT permit in Great Smoky Mountains National Park ($20), AT passport ($7)
Resupply and Packing Strategy:
Numbered bag system, weekly resupply points
Hiking Tips:
Start at 8 miles/day, plan Zero days, practice with all gear before hike
Year:
2023-2024
Term:
Spring
Course:
Mechanical Engineering Design
Project Type:
Shaft and Gear Analysis
Material:
AISI 1018 cold-drawn steel
Components:
Countershaft, Gears, Bearings
Calculations Required:
Force transmission, Bearing reactions, Shear-force and bending-moment diagrams, Bending and torsional stresses, Principal stresses, Fatigue factor of safety
Students:
Abdulkadir Ekinci, Ali Türkmen, Arda Erkol, Bilgenur İşcan, Erkan Söylemez, Feyza Betül Gelici, Mohamad Karam Nahlavı, Muhammed Çorbacıoğlu, Nurefşan Adsız, Resul Güçlü, Şevval Kardeşler, Yusuf Yılmaz, Batuhan Ünlü, Elif Düşünceli, Erol Miraç Karataş, Mehmet Ali Çiftçi, Muhammed Emin Yüksekyayla, Rana Usta
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Washington State, USA
Subject:
Education, College Readiness, Scholarships, Student Resources
Document Type:
Weekly Bulletin
Organization:
WA State GEAR UP Program, WSAC, OSPI, PNACAC
Author:
WA State GEAR UP Program Staff
Target Audience:
High school students, families, educators, counselors
Period Covered:
October 30 – November 3, 2023
Publication Date:
October 30, 2023
Key Events:
12th Year Campaign Financial Aid Events, CASHE Conference, NACAC Virtual College Fair
Languages Available:
English, Arabic, Chuukese, Marshallese, Russian, Somali, Spanish, Vietnamese
Resources Highlighted:
Family Newsletters, Virtual Speaker Series, Financial Aid Advising Day
Scholarships and Opportunities:
Elks Most Valuable Student, Odenza Marketing Group, 10 Words or Less, NCWIT Award, SchoolHouse Connection, ACT SIX Programs
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2017
Region / city:
Armenia
Topic:
Child Rights, Education, Disability
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Human Rights Watch
Author:
Human Rights Watch
Target Audience:
General public, policymakers, NGOs, international organizations
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
Contextual description:
A report documenting the abuse, discrimination, and lack of access to quality education for children with disabilities in Armenia’s residential institutions.
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Bucks County, Doylestown, PA
Subject:
Child Support, Spousal Support, Alimony Pendente Lite
Document Type:
Informational Guide
Organization / Institution:
Bucks County Domestic Relations Section
Target Audience:
Individuals seeking support or modifications to existing support orders
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Aurora, Colorado
Topic:
Exterior property improvements
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organ / Institution:
Residential Improvement Guideline Committee
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Homeowners in the Inspiration Metropolitan District
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Bristol, Essex, Franklin, Hampden, Hampshire, Middlesex, Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk, Worcester
Theme:
Health Insurance, Medicare
Document Type:
Brochure
Organization / Institution:
Commonwealth Care Alliance, Inc. (CCA)
Author:
Commonwealth Care Alliance, Inc.
Target Audience:
People 65 or older, eligible for Medicare and MassHealth Standard
Period of validity:
2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Description