№ lp_1_2_01296
File format: docx
Character count: 10320
File size: 36 KB
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Wellington
Theme:
Consumer credit legislation
Document type:
Submission template
Organization:
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE)
Author:
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Target audience:
Individuals and organizations providing submissions on the discussion document
Period of validity:
Until 19 June 2024
Date of approval:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Context:
A template for submitting written responses to the "Fit for purpose consumer credit legislation" discussion document, intended for consultation with stakeholders.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
England
Topic:
Higher Education, Governance
Document Type:
Form
Institution:
University of Leicester
Author:
University of Leicester
Target Audience:
University Council, Executive Board, Senior Management
Period of Validity:
Annual
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Theme:
Colorectal Cancer Referral Guidelines
Document Type:
Medical Guidelines
Organization:
National Health Service (NHS)
Author:
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)
Target Audience:
Healthcare professionals in primary and secondary care
Effective Period:
From August 2023
Date of Approval:
August 2023
Date of Amendments:
None mentioned
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Note:
Year
Organization / Institution:
UN Environment Programme (UNEP)
Target Audience:
Insurance organizations, stakeholders in climate action
Year:
2021
Region:
Washington State, USA
Topic:
Respiratory Protection
Document Type:
Guidance / Instructional Document
Organization:
Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS), Washington State
Legal Reference:
Washington Administrative Code Chapter 296-842
Target Audience:
Long-term care facility employers and staff
Requirements:
Fit testing, medical evaluation, respirator program implementation
Respirator Types:
N95, KN95
Implementation Period:
During COVID-19 pandemic
Third-Party Providers:
Concentra, National Fit-Testing, Northwest Response, Occupational Health Clinics
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Wellington, New Zealand
Theme:
Financial Services Regulation
Document Type:
Submission Template
Organization / Institution:
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE)
Author:
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE)
Target Audience:
Stakeholders and organizations involved in financial services
Action Period:
Until 5pm, 19 June 2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Note:
Key accountabilities
Internal:
Relevant Reporting Manager, TFLE Work Team, TFLE Stakeholders.
External:
TFLE Stakeholders as applicable.
Decision making:
The role is accountable for delivering to the TFLE project work assignments on time and to expectations regarding quality, deliverables and outcomes.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Australia
Topic:
Vocational Education and Training
Document Type:
Regulatory Instrument
Organization:
National Vocational Education and Training Regulator
Author:
Australian Government
Target Audience:
Registered Training Organisations, Vocational Education and Training Providers
Period of Effect:
2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Year:
2024
Organization:
Sherwood Forest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Type of document:
Guidance / Reporting Procedure
Author:
R Cotterill
Version:
1.1
Target audience:
Board Members
Related legislation:
Health & Social Care Act 2008
Reporting frequency:
Annual
Effective period:
April 2024 onward
Storage locations:
Electronic Staff Record (ESR), Fit & Proper Persons Shared Drive, Individual Personal File
Access restrictions:
Director of Corporate Affairs, Recruitment Manager, Associate Director of People (Transformation)
Checks covered:
New appointments, annual assessments, external references, disciplinary records, DBS checks, professional register, insolvency, social media, employment tribunal judgments, charity trustee disqualification
Note:
Year
Document type:
Referral Form
Institution:
Croydon University Hospital
Target Audience:
Medical professionals, general practitioners, and healthcare providers
Priority:
2WW
Specialty:
2WW
Clinic type:
2WW Lower GI
Service name:
2WW FIT Negative Significant Concerns Telephone Assessment (LGI)
Referral Timeline:
24 hours
Note:
Year
Note:
Year
Subject:
Credit institution’s declaration
Type of document:
Declaration
Target audience:
Financial institutions, regulatory bodies
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Bonn, Germany
Topic:
Ecological connectivity, CMS Article III.4
Document type:
Workshop preparatory material
Organization:
UNEP, CMS
Target audience:
Workshop participants, national legislators, conservation experts
Period of validity:
3–5 June 2025
Date of approval:
20 May 2025
Date of amendments:
N/A
Year:
2015–2016
Country:
Zimbabwe
Jurisdiction:
Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe
Type of document:
Court judgment / legal ruling
Applicant:
T Biti, Member of Parliament for Lobengula Constituency
Respondents:
Samuel Sipepa Nkomo, Minister of Local Government, Rural & Urban Development; Minister of Justice, Legal & Parliamentary Affairs
Legal basis:
Sections 56(1), 85(1), 267, 270, 273 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe
Issue:
Alleged breach of constitutional rights due to failure to enact devolution legislation
Hearing dates:
June 17, 2015 & June 29, 2016
Representation:
T Biti for applicant; M Chimombe for respondents
Year:
1992
Region / City:
Ghana
Theme:
Legislation
Document Type:
Legal Framework
Institution:
Parliament of Ghana
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, policymakers, scholars
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Queensland
Subject:
Data Breach Response
Document Type:
Template
Agency:
Office of the Information Commissioner
Target Audience:
Public sector agencies, Local government
Period of Application:
From 1 July 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Last Change:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Queensland
Theme:
Information Privacy
Document Type:
Template
Organ / Institution:
Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC)
Author:
Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC)
Target Audience:
Queensland public sector agencies
Period of Effectiveness:
From 1 July 2025
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A