№ lp_1_16891
File format: docx
Character count: 7717
File size: 103 KB
This document outlines the process and requirements for organizations wishing to join the Forum for Insurance Transition to Net Zero (FIT), facilitated by UNEP, focusing on climate action and sustainability in the insurance industry.
Note:
Year
Organization / Institution:
UN Environment Programme (UNEP)
Target Audience:
Insurance organizations, stakeholders in climate action
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Oregon
Topic:
Health certification
Document type:
Instructional guide
Institution:
Oregon Health Authority
Author:
PacificSource Community Solutions
Target audience:
Individuals pursuing certification as Personal Health Navigators
Effective period:
Ongoing
Approval date:
May 13, 2019
Changes date:
July 1, 2022
Context:
Guide for individuals seeking certification as a Personal Health Navigator in Oregon, detailing the steps and requirements.
Note:
Year
Year:
2013
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Christian theology, New Testament exegesis
Document Type:
Academic paper
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
John E. Doe
Target Audience:
Scholars and students of theology, particularly those studying the New Testament
Period of Validity:
Not applicable
Date of Approval:
January 1, 2013
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2026
Region / City:
UK
Theme:
Cybersecurity, Incident Response
Document Type:
Application Guidelines
Institution:
National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC)
Author:
NCSC
Target Audience:
Companies applying for CIR Scheme
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Country:
[Country where the Organisation is established]
Sector:
Humanitarian Aid
Document Type:
Ex-ante Assessment Report
Organisation:
DG ECHO
Author:
[Audit firm and office having responsibility for the assessment]
Target Audience:
DG ECHO, EU funding bodies, Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs)
Assessment Period:
[date] to [date]
Date of Approval:
[Date]
Date of Changes:
[Date]
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Half Moon Bay, California
Subject:
Legal Services
Document Type:
Request for Proposals
Authority / Institution:
City of Half Moon Bay
Author:
Lisa Rossi, Administrative Services Director
Target Audience:
Law Firms
Period of Effectiveness:
Not specified
Approval Date:
October 24, 2025
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Pennsylvania
Topic:
DeMolay Advisor Registration
Document Type:
Instructional Guide
Organization / Institution:
DeMolay International
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Prospective DeMolay Advisors
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
San Francisco
Topic:
Vendor compliance requirements for doing business with the City
Document type:
Instructional/Guideline
Organization / Institution:
City of San Francisco
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Vendors seeking to do business with the City
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Oregon
Theme:
Community Health, Certification
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
Oregon Health Authority
Author:
PacificSource Community Solutions
Target Audience:
Community Health Workers
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2024
Region / City:
(municipality)
Topic:
Embedded generation, renewable energy
Document Type:
Guidelines
Author:
AMEU, SALGA, Sustainable Energy Africa, GreenCape
Target Audience:
SSEG project developers, residential and commercial property owners, SSEG installers, energy consultants
Validity Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
January 2024
Modification Date:
Not specified
Description:
This document outlines the requirements and process for connecting small-scale embedded generation (SSEG) systems to the municipal electrical network in the Municipality of (municipality).
Note:
Year
Topic:
Self-Improvement, Forgiveness
Document Type:
Workbook
Organization / Institution:
Virginia Commonwealth University
Author:
Everett L. Worthington, Jr., PhD
Target Audience:
General Public
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Gloucestershire
Topic:
Elective Home Education
Document Type:
Form
Organization:
Gloucestershire County Council
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Parents wishing to Electively Home Educate
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Western Australia
Subject:
Heavy Vehicle Accreditation
Document Type:
Operator Guide
Agency / Organization:
Main Roads Western Australia
Author:
Main Roads Western Australia
Target Audience:
Operators seeking or maintaining accreditation for heavy vehicles
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
June 2023
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
England
Topic:
Higher Education, Governance
Document Type:
Form
Institution:
University of Leicester
Author:
University of Leicester
Target Audience:
University Council, Executive Board, Senior Management
Period of Validity:
Annual
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Theme:
Colorectal Cancer Referral Guidelines
Document Type:
Medical Guidelines
Organization:
National Health Service (NHS)
Author:
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)
Target Audience:
Healthcare professionals in primary and secondary care
Effective Period:
From August 2023
Date of Approval:
August 2023
Date of Amendments:
None mentioned
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2021
Region:
Washington State, USA
Topic:
Respiratory Protection
Document Type:
Guidance / Instructional Document
Organization:
Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS), Washington State
Legal Reference:
Washington Administrative Code Chapter 296-842
Target Audience:
Long-term care facility employers and staff
Requirements:
Fit testing, medical evaluation, respirator program implementation
Respirator Types:
N95, KN95
Implementation Period:
During COVID-19 pandemic
Third-Party Providers:
Concentra, National Fit-Testing, Northwest Response, Occupational Health Clinics