№ lp_1_2_24028
File format: docx
Character count: 31674
File size: 497 KB
The document outlines the compliance and fit and proper person requirements for Vocational Education and Training (VET) providers in Australia, including standards for certification, training products, and accountability measures.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Australia
Topic:
Vocational Education and Training
Document Type:
Regulatory Instrument
Organization:
National Vocational Education and Training Regulator
Author:
Australian Government
Target Audience:
Registered Training Organisations, Vocational Education and Training Providers
Period of Effect:
2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Tuvalu
Theme:
Fisheries, Environmental Protection, Stakeholder Engagement
Document Type:
Stakeholder Engagement Plan
Organization / Institution:
Tuvalu Fisheries Department, Ministry of Finance
Author:
Tuvalu Fisheries Department, Central Project Management Office
Target Audience:
Government officials, development agencies, local stakeholders, NGOs, project-affected parties
Period of Action:
2023-2029
Approval Date:
August 2023
Date of Revisions:
Not specified
This document outlines the approach for engaging stakeholders throughout the lifecycle of the Tuvalu:
Pacific Islands Regional Oceanscape Program – Second Phase for Economic Resilience (PROPER) Project.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
England
Topic:
Higher Education, Governance
Document Type:
Form
Institution:
University of Leicester
Author:
University of Leicester
Target Audience:
University Council, Executive Board, Senior Management
Period of Validity:
Annual
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Academic Paper Submission Guidelines
Document Type:
Paper Submission Template
Institution / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Researchers and Authors submitting academic papers
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Context
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Energy Efficiency, Home Improvement, Campaigns
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), ENERGY STAR
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Homeowners, Environmental Advocates, Energy Efficiency Enthusiasts
Validity Period:
October 1, 2023 – November 20, 2023
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Context:
Press release announcing the collaboration between [Organization Name] and ENERGY STAR to promote attic sealing and insulation for homeowners to reduce energy costs.
Year:
2012
Region / City:
Morgan County, Georgia
Topic:
Legal procedure, DUI test evidence
Document type:
Court brief
Organ / Institution:
Superior Court of Morgan County, Georgia
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Legal professionals, court officials
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2024
Organization:
Sherwood Forest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Type of document:
Guidance / Reporting Procedure
Author:
R Cotterill
Version:
1.1
Target audience:
Board Members
Related legislation:
Health & Social Care Act 2008
Reporting frequency:
Annual
Effective period:
April 2024 onward
Storage locations:
Electronic Staff Record (ESR), Fit & Proper Persons Shared Drive, Individual Personal File
Access restrictions:
Director of Corporate Affairs, Recruitment Manager, Associate Director of People (Transformation)
Checks covered:
New appointments, annual assessments, external references, disciplinary records, DBS checks, professional register, insolvency, social media, employment tribunal judgments, charity trustee disqualification
Note:
Year
Note:
Year
Subject:
Credit institution’s declaration
Type of document:
Declaration
Target audience:
Financial institutions, regulatory bodies
Note:
Year
Subject:
Laser Safety
Document Type:
Instruction Manual
Year:
2023
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Subject:
Compliance, Independence, Confidentiality, Fit and Proper Status
Document Type:
Form
Organization:
[Firm Name]
Author:
[Firm Name]
Target Audience:
Firm partners, staff, sub-contractors, and consultants
Period of validity:
Annual
Approval Date:
[Date of Approval]
Amendment Date:
[Date of Last Amendment]
Jurisdiction:
Australia
Regulatory authority:
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
Subject:
Australian financial services (AFS) licence application
Document type:
Application form template
Applicants covered:
Natural person, body corporate, partnership, multiple trustees of a trust
Key requirements:
National criminal history check; Bankruptcy check; Statement of Personal Information
Declaration included:
Applicant’s declaration of fit and proper status and absence of misconduct matters
Attachments required:
National criminal history check and bankruptcy check (not more than 12 months old); Statement of Personal Information
Information scope:
Fit and proper persons; Controllers and relevant persons; Officers, partners, trustees and senior managers
Note:
Year
Author:
Richard A. Smith, Taro Suzuki, Hanako Satoh
Year:
2014
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Subject:
Health & Social Care
Document Type:
Guidance
Author:
Care Quality Commission
Target Audience:
NHS Directors, Non-Executive Directors, Recruitment Officers
Period of Validity:
From 27th November 2014
Approval Date:
20th November 2014
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
England
Topic:
Higher Education, Governance
Document Type:
Form
Institution:
University of Leicester
Author:
University of Leicester
Target Audience:
University Council, Executive Board, Senior Management
Period of Validity:
Annual
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Theme:
Colorectal Cancer Referral Guidelines
Document Type:
Medical Guidelines
Organization:
National Health Service (NHS)
Author:
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)
Target Audience:
Healthcare professionals in primary and secondary care
Effective Period:
From August 2023
Date of Approval:
August 2023
Date of Amendments:
None mentioned
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Note:
Year
Organization / Institution:
UN Environment Programme (UNEP)
Target Audience:
Insurance organizations, stakeholders in climate action