№ files_lp_3_process_9_26619
File format: docx
Character count: 1279
File size: 71 KB
This document is an application form for Mongolian CSOs seeking financial support to implement social services projects under the "Voices for Change" EU initiative.
Year:
N/A
Region / city:
Mongolia
Topic:
Social Services, Community Voices
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization / Institution:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Civil society organizations (CSOs) in Mongolia
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Document type:
Master’s thesis
Academic field:
E-government and public sector information systems
Institution:
Corvinus University of Budapest
Department:
Department of Public Policy and Management
Thesis supervisor:
Krisztián Kádár
Supervisor title:
Ph.D., Master lecturer
Country focus:
Mongolia
Case study organization:
Ministry of Finance of Mongolia
Research topic:
Interoperability of e-government information systems
Methodology:
Case study and literature review
Key systems discussed:
Government Financial Management Information System (GFMIS), Budget Planning Information System (BPIS)
Supporting organizations mentioned:
World Bank, International Monetary Fund, Asian Development Bank, KOICA, JICA
Thematic scope:
Public financial management reforms, ICT adoption, enterprise systems integration
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Theme:
Mongolian language and culture
Document Type:
Course Program
Institution:
Institute for Mongolian Studies, National University of Mongolia
Author:
Institute for Mongolian Studies
Target Audience:
Students and individuals interested in Mongolian language and culture
Validity Period:
3rd August - 16th August, 2025
Approval Date:
N/A
Changes Date:
N/A
Description:
A program offering an intensive two-week summer course in Mongolian language and culture, including classes and cultural excursions in Ulaanbaatar and the countryside.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Santa Monica, California, USA
Subject:
Visual Arts / Cultural Studies
Document Type:
Lesson Plan
Institution:
Santa Monica High School
Instructor:
Amy Bouse
Grade Level:
9-12
Unit Duration:
15 x 55-minute periods
Art Medium:
Painting (2D Visual Art)
Cultural Focus:
Mongolian Buddhism and nomadic culture
Learning Objectives:
Compare landscapes of Mongolia and California, explore composition and visual vocabulary, create artwork inspired by Mongolian Buddhist iconography
Standards:
California Arts Standards Adv.VA:Cr3, Social Justice Standard (10)
Materials Required:
Paper, pencils, acrylic paint, brushes, palettes, canvas boards, optional markers/pastels, projector, easels
Assessment Criteria:
Participation in discussions, completion of patterns, sketches, and final painting, contribution to critiques
Year:
2026
Institution:
Indiana University Bloomington
Region:
Bloomington, Indiana, USA
Type of document:
Constitution
Organization:
Indiana University Mongolian Students Association
Target audience:
Students and faculty of Indiana University, Bloomington community
Membership requirements:
Open to all IUB students regardless of age, color, disability, ethnicity, gender, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sexual orientation, or veteran status
Governance:
Executive officers serve on a volunteer basis; elections held if multiple volunteers
Meeting frequency:
At least once a month or as projects require
Financial policy:
No membership dues; treasurer manages funds according to university policies
Amendment procedure:
Amendments require a 2/3 vote of members present
Anti-hazing policy:
Hazing strictly prohibited under all circumstances
Collaboration:
Works with Mongolia Society and Central Eurasian Studies Department
Legal compliance:
Must comply with Indiana University regulations and local, state, federal laws
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Albania
Topic:
Elections, Voter Education
Document Type:
Grant Proposal
Organization / Institution:
Council of Europe
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Civil Society Organizations, Education Institutions, First-time Voters
Period of Validity:
Until February 28, 2026
Approval Date:
January 17, 2025
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Pakistan
Theme:
Women’s political participation, leadership development, mentorship
Document type:
Call for proposals
Organization / institution:
UN Women
Author:
UN Women
Target audience:
Civil Society Organizations (CSOs)
Period of validity:
2025–2029
Approval date:
September 29, 2025
Amendment date:
October 15, 2025
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Bangladesh
Topic:
Gender Responsive Disaster Risk Reduction
Document Type:
Call For Proposals
Organization / Institution:
UN Women
Author:
UN Women
Target Audience:
Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), Proponents
Period of Action:
2025
Approval Date:
20 March 2025
Amendment Date:
03 April 2025
Contextual description:
A call for proposals issued by UN Women for civil society organizations to engage in gender-responsive disaster risk reduction initiatives in Bangladesh.
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Global
Subject:
Women’s Political Participation, Gender Equality
Document Type:
Call for Proposals
Organization:
UN Women
Author:
UN Women
Target Audience:
Civil society organizations, women’s rights organizations, youth movements, proponents in the Generation Equality Action Coalition on Feminist Movements and Leadership
Period of Validity:
Until 11 November 2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
India
Theme:
Gender Equality, Women’s Empowerment, Care Economy
Document Type:
Call for Proposal
Organization:
UN Women
Target Audience:
Civil Society Organizations, Academic Institutions, Research Institutions, Strategy Consulting Firms
Action Period:
July 2024 – August 2024
Approval Date:
10th June 2024
Amendment Date:
17th June 2024
Year:
2020
Region / City:
South Africa
Subject:
Community schemes, homeowners’ associations, body corporates
Document type:
FAQ
Organization:
CSOS (Community Schemes Ombud Service)
Author:
Ndivhuo Rabuli
Target audience:
Homeowners’ associations, body corporates, trustees
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
23 June 2020
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Not specified
Topic:
Corruption, Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), Capacity Building
Document type:
Application form
Organization / institution:
European Union (EU)
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) working on integrity and anti-corruption initiatives
Validity period:
Until 31st August 2025
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Context description:
Application form for CSOs seeking financial support for innovative anti-corruption projects.
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Global
Theme:
Community-based Complaints Mechanism, Humanitarian Aid, Development Assistance
Document Type:
How-to Guide
Organization:
CSOs (Civil Society Organizations)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) in humanitarian and development sectors
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Uganda
Topic:
Women, Peace, and Security in Refugee Settlements
Document Type:
Call for Proposals
Organization:
UN Women
Author:
Natasha Butorac
Target Audience:
Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), Government and Non-Government Actors
Period of Action:
2025-2027
Approval Date:
9th December 2024
Amendment Date:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2017
Region / Country:
Kenya, Africa
Sector:
Governance
Type of document:
Program For Results Information Document (PID)
Implementing Agency:
The National Treasury
Author:
The Republic of Kenya
Target Audience:
Government officials, policy makers, and stakeholders in governance and public management
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
August 2, 2017
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Ethiopia
Topic:
Safety Net Program
Document Type:
Aide Memoire
Organ / Institution:
Government of Ethiopia, Development Partners, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), PSNP Donor Coordination Team (DCT)
Author:
Government of Ethiopia and Development Partners
Target Audience:
Government Officials, Donors, NGOs, Stakeholders in Ethiopia’s Safety Net Program
Period of Effectiveness:
May-June 2024
Approval Date:
May-June 2024
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Summary
Year:
2024
Region / city:
ICCAT
Topic:
Fisheries management, compliance
Document type:
Proposal
Organ / institution:
European Union
Author:
European Union
Target audience:
ICCAT Compliance Committee (COC), CPCs
Period of validity:
Until COC 2026
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Sierra Leone
Theme:
Local governance, rural communities, accountability
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Search for Common Ground, Centre for Coordination of Youth Activities (CCYA)
Author:
Thomas Johnny
Target Audience:
Rural communities, local authorities, development practitioners
Period of Effect:
2017–2020
Approval Date:
September 2017
Date of Changes:
None
Note:
Contextual Description
Country:
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia
Project:
Strengthen Ethiopia’s Adaptive Safety Net (SEASN): World Bank Support to PSNP5 (P172479)
Document Type:
Environmental and Social Commitment Plan
Date:
July 2020
Status:
Final Draft
Implementing Ministries:
Ministry of Agriculture; Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs
Financing Institution:
International Development Association
Framework:
Environmental and Social Framework (ESF)
Related Instruments:
Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF); Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP); Labour Management Plan (LMP)
Responsible Directorate:
Food Security Coordination Directorate (FSCD)
Reporting Frequency:
Quarterly, Annual, and 6-monthly Environmental and Social Progress Reports
Incident Notification Period:
Within seventy-two (72) hours
Project Components Referenced:
Public Works; Livelihoods Support
Year:
2024-2027
Region / city:
Ethiopia
Topic:
Business Membership Organizations, Civil Society Organizations, Private Sector, Value Chains
Document type:
Call for proposals
Organization / institution:
European Commission
Author:
European Commission
Target audience:
Business Membership Organizations, Civil Society Organizations, policy makers
Duration:
2024-2027
Approval date:
N/A
Amendment date:
N/A