№ lp_1_2_20653
File format: docx
Character count: 13403
File size: 58 KB
The document presents a proposal by the European Union to simplify and streamline the processes of the ICCAT Compliance Committee (COC), addressing issues related to document complexity, compliance assessment, and intersessional procedures.
Year:
2024
Region / city:
ICCAT
Topic:
Fisheries management, compliance
Document type:
Proposal
Organ / institution:
European Union
Author:
European Union
Target audience:
ICCAT Compliance Committee (COC), CPCs
Period of validity:
Until COC 2026
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Wyoming
Theme:
Internet, video, voice services
Document type:
Agreement
Agency / Organization:
Stream LLC
Author:
Streamline
Target audience:
Residential customers
Effective period:
Until termination
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2016
Region / City:
Washington, D.C.
Topic:
Amendments to Part 20 rules
Document Type:
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Agency / Organization:
Federal Communications Commission
Author:
Federal Communications Commission
Target Audience:
Wireless licensees, applicants, regulatory authorities
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
July 27, 2016
Date of Changes:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2017
Region / Country:
Kenya, Africa
Sector:
Governance
Type of document:
Program For Results Information Document (PID)
Implementing Agency:
The National Treasury
Author:
The Republic of Kenya
Target Audience:
Government officials, policy makers, and stakeholders in governance and public management
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Date of Approval:
August 2, 2017
Date of Modifications:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Ethiopia
Topic:
Safety Net Program
Document Type:
Aide Memoire
Organ / Institution:
Government of Ethiopia, Development Partners, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), PSNP Donor Coordination Team (DCT)
Author:
Government of Ethiopia and Development Partners
Target Audience:
Government Officials, Donors, NGOs, Stakeholders in Ethiopia’s Safety Net Program
Period of Effectiveness:
May-June 2024
Approval Date:
May-June 2024
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Summary
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Sierra Leone
Theme:
Local governance, rural communities, accountability
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Search for Common Ground, Centre for Coordination of Youth Activities (CCYA)
Author:
Thomas Johnny
Target Audience:
Rural communities, local authorities, development practitioners
Period of Effect:
2017–2020
Approval Date:
September 2017
Date of Changes:
None
Note:
Contextual Description
Country:
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia
Project:
Strengthen Ethiopia’s Adaptive Safety Net (SEASN): World Bank Support to PSNP5 (P172479)
Document Type:
Environmental and Social Commitment Plan
Date:
July 2020
Status:
Final Draft
Implementing Ministries:
Ministry of Agriculture; Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs
Financing Institution:
International Development Association
Framework:
Environmental and Social Framework (ESF)
Related Instruments:
Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF); Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP); Labour Management Plan (LMP)
Responsible Directorate:
Food Security Coordination Directorate (FSCD)
Reporting Frequency:
Quarterly, Annual, and 6-monthly Environmental and Social Progress Reports
Incident Notification Period:
Within seventy-two (72) hours
Project Components Referenced:
Public Works; Livelihoods Support
Year:
2024-2027
Region / city:
Ethiopia
Topic:
Business Membership Organizations, Civil Society Organizations, Private Sector, Value Chains
Document type:
Call for proposals
Organization / institution:
European Commission
Author:
European Commission
Target audience:
Business Membership Organizations, Civil Society Organizations, policy makers
Duration:
2024-2027
Approval date:
N/A
Amendment date:
N/A
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Thailand
Topic:
Service technology, insurance
Document Type:
Press release
Organization:
Toyota Motor Thailand Co., Ltd.
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
General public, customers, industry professionals
Effective Date:
5 July 2022
Date of Changes:
None
Partnership:
Toyota Motor Thailand Co., Ltd. and Aioi Bangkok Insurance PCL
Services Mentioned:
T-Connect, PHYD, Telematics
Product:
Pay-How-You-Drive insurance scheme
Total Members:
120,000
Vehicle Production:
Over 300,000 vehicles with Telematics systems pre-installed
Date of Launch:
5 July 2022
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Washington, D.C.
Theme:
Local-Federal Collaboration
Document Type:
Press Release
Organization:
CCAO (County Commissioners Association of Ohio)
Author:
Stephen Pflug
Target Audience:
County officials, local government leaders
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
May 22, 2025
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Queensland
Theme:
Obesity prevention, health policy
Document type:
Strategy, Action Plan
Organization / Institution:
Health and Wellbeing Queensland
Author:
Health and Wellbeing Queensland
Target audience:
Government, health professionals, community organizations, stakeholders in obesity prevention
Period of validity:
2023-2032
Approval date:
4 March 2022
Date of changes:
N/A
Note:
Description
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Economic Development
Document Type:
Assessment Tool
Author:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Target Audience:
Local Governments, Rural Communities
Period of Application:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Ohio (Cleveland, Dayton, Columbus)
Topic:
Community Mediation, Dispute Resolution
Document Type:
Research Paper
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Keri Richardson
Target Audience:
Policymakers, Community Leaders, Law Enforcement, Public
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2022
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Racial Equity, Community Collaboration, Family Services
Document Type:
Memo
Organization:
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Administration for Children and Families (ACF)
Author:
Tracy Fields
Target Audience:
Grantees, Program Managers
Period of Application:
April 21, 2022 – Ongoing
Approval Date:
April 21, 2022
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Context
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Somaliland, Hargeisa
Theme:
Humanitarian, Climate Change Adaptation, Water & Soil Conservation
Document Type:
Intervention Application
Organization:
GAME
Author:
GAME, SCORE
Target Audience:
Donors, Humanitarian Agencies, Implementing Partners
Period of Activity:
2022-2023
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Note:
Contextual description
Year:
2025
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Immunization, Measles
Document Type:
Resolution
Organization / Institution:
World Health Assembly
Target Audience:
Governments, Public Health Officials
Action Period:
2025–2030
Approval Date:
2025
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Program progress and evaluation
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
Administration for Children & Families (ACF)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Grantees and project staff
Period of Action:
October 1 – March 31, April 1 – September 30
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified