№ lp_1_2_59478
File format: docx
Character count: 53240
File size: 267 KB
The document is a bidding invitation for the procurement of IT equipment, including laptops and printers, issued by Thimphu TechPark Limited, outlining terms, conditions, and technical specifications for eligible bidders.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Thimphu
Topic:
IT Equipment Procurement
Document Type:
Bidding Document
Organization / Institution:
Thimphu TechPark Limited
Author:
Thimphu TechPark Limited
Target Audience:
Eligible Bidders
Validity Period:
From 8th March 2021 to 30th March 2021
Approval Date:
8th March 2021
Amendment Date:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Monrovia, Liberia
Subject:
Procurement of goods for Government project
Document Type:
Procurement Notice
Organization / Institution:
Public Procurement and Concessions Commission (PPCC)
Author:
Government of Liberia
Target Audience:
Eligible Bidders
Period of Validity:
Until December 23, 2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2015
Region / city:
N/A
Topic:
Printer Compatibility with Windows 10 Mobile
Document Type:
Technical Specification
Author:
Microsoft
Target audience:
Developers, Device Manufacturers
Validity period:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Modification date:
N/A
Institution:
Purdue University
Topic:
Occupational health and safety
Document type:
Health and safety guideline
Scope:
Use of 3D printers and additive manufacturing equipment
Covered technologies:
FDM, SLA, SLS, MJM
Hazards addressed:
Ultrafine particles, volatile organic compounds, physical hazards, chemical hazards, flammable and reactive dusts, biological materials
Intended users:
Faculty, staff, and students
Geographic scope:
Purdue University facilities
Subject area:
Laboratory safety and hazard communication
Internal reference:
SOP guideline
Minimum requirements:
Safe operation of 3D printers
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Global
Theme:
3D printing, Selective Laser Sintering technology
Document Type:
Technical Specifications
Organization / Institution:
Formlabs
Author:
Formlabs Engineering Team
Target Audience:
Professionals in 3D printing, engineers, and designers
Action Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2010
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Device Metadata, Windows 7
Document Type:
Technical Guide
Organization / Institution:
Microsoft
Author:
Microsoft
Target Audience:
Independent hardware vendors (IHVs), PC makers
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
October 28, 2010
Date of Changes:
October 28, 2010
Version:
1.0
Related Resources:
Windows 7 Windows Driver Kit (WDK)
Content Format:
XML Schemas, Device Metadata Packages
File Format:
.devicemetadata-ms
Year:
2015
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
3D Printing, Chemistry Education
Organization:
American Chemical Society
Editors:
William Bleam, Regis Goode, Donald McKinney, Barbara Sitzman, Ronald Tempest
Contributors:
Susan Cooper, Patrice Pages
Target Audience:
Teachers and students
Format:
PDF, Microsoft Word
Period of Use:
2015
References:
ChemMatters articles (1983–2013), additional web resources
Topics Covered:
3D printer mechanics, plastic materials, polymer chemistry, classroom activities
Year:
2023
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Technology, 3D Printing
Document Type:
Informational Article
Author:
U.S. Department of Energy
Target Audience:
General public, manufacturers, hobbyists, students, and educators
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Sibasa, Limpopo, South Africa
Subject:
Procurement of IT equipment and digital recording devices
Document Type:
Tender Notice
Institution:
Vhembe TVET College
Contact Person:
Mr ND Maiwashe
Tender Number:
VTVET No 69/2017
Bid Closing Date:
02/12/2017, 11:00
Bid Collection Start Date:
06/11/2017
Required Documents:
Valid Taxi Clearance Certificate, CK, Certified BEE Verification Certificate, Proof of Company Residence, Compliance to Tender Specifications, Letter of Financial Good Standing
Payment:
Non-refundable R350.00
Submission Location:
Tender Box B, Central Office, Stand No 203, Sibasa
Evaluation Criteria:
80/20 scoring points
Delivery Location:
Mashamba Campus
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Bangalore
Subject:
Tender for supply of laptops
Document Type:
Tender Notification
Organization:
Government of Karnataka, Department of Public Libraries
Author:
Deputy Director, City Central Library, West Zone
Target Audience:
Eligible firms for tender submission
Validity Period:
From 01-02-2019 to 05-03-2019
Approval Date:
01-02-2019
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Procurement
Document Type:
Amendment
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Bidders
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
19th February 2026
Context:
This document is an amendment to a bidding document for procurement, outlining changes to the pricing schedule and submission requirements for bids related to laptops, cellphones, and other IT equipment.
Year:
2026
Region:
International
Topic:
Assistive Technology / Screen Reader and Magnification Software
Document Type:
User Guide / Quick Reference
Organization:
Dolphin Computer Access
Author:
Dolphin Software Team
Target Audience:
Users of SuperNova software
Supported Editions:
Magnifier, Magnifier & Speech, Magnifier & Screen Reader
Supported Devices:
Desktops, Laptops, Touchscreens
Contents:
Keyboard Shortcuts, Magnifier, Speech, Touchscreen Gestures, Dolphin Cursor, Item Finder, Braille, Layered Hotkeys, Support and Contact Information
Document Version:
Latest
Publication Date:
2026
End of Document:
SuperNova software features and hotkey functions
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Rwanda
Subject:
Procurement of IT Equipment
Document Type:
Technical Bid / Tender Submission
Organization:
African Institute for Mathematical Sciences Research and Innovation Centre
Bidder:
Not specified in the document
Items Offered:
Dell Latitude 5440 Laptop, Dell Eco Loop Pro Backpack, Dell Mobile Wireless Mouse, Dell 7-in-1 USB-C Dock
Specifications:
Detailed technical specifications provided for each item
Target Audience:
Procurement Evaluation Committee
Reference Number:
RFQ-47-013-2024-07-0001
Submission Date:
Not specified in the document
Approval Status:
Pending evaluation
Country:
Zambia
Region / City:
Lusaka
Institution:
Zambia National Public Health Institute
Supervising Ministry:
Ministry of Health
Document Type:
Government procurement bidding document
Procurement Method:
Open National Bidding (ONB)
IFB Number:
ZNPHI/ORD/08/2024
Reference Number:
ZNPHI/ORD/09/2024
Project:
Sample-Based Mortality Surveillance System in Zambia
Funding Partner:
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Procuring Entity:
Zambia National Public Health Institute
Issue Date:
25 November 2024
Bid Submission Deadline:
3 January 2025, 10:30 local time
Bid Validity Period:
120 days after bid opening
Goods Covered:
Mobile phones, laptops, desktop computers
Legal Framework:
Public Procurement Act No. 8 of 2020; Public Procurement Regulations Statutory Instrument No. 30 of 2022
Prepared By:
Zambia Public Procurement Authority
Contact Address:
Stand No. 1186, Corner Addis Ababa Drive and Chaholi Road, Rhodes Park, P.O. Box 30206, Lusaka, Zambia
Year:
2026
Organization:
Municipal Tax System, LLC
Author:
Josef G. Obernier
Document type:
Technical instruction / installation guide
Target audience:
MTS users and IT staff
Region / Location:
West Brandywine, PA, USA
System requirements:
Windows 10 or Windows 11, Intel i7 or higher, minimum 8 GB RAM, 500 GB SSD, Ethernet connection, USB barcode scanner compatibility
Additional hardware recommendations:
External screens, keyboard, scanner cradle, RJ45 dongle
Confidentiality:
Contains privileged and confidential information intended for specific recipients
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Edinburgh
Topic:
Assistive Technology, Staff Support
Document Type:
Equipment Loan Agreement
Institution:
University of Edinburgh
Author:
Jed Bajai
Target Audience:
University Staff
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Note:
Description
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Sibasa, Limpopo, South Africa
Subject:
Procurement of IT equipment and digital recording devices
Document Type:
Tender Notice
Institution:
Vhembe TVET College
Contact Person:
Mr ND Maiwashe
Tender Number:
VTVET No 69/2017
Bid Closing Date:
02/12/2017, 11:00
Bid Collection Start Date:
06/11/2017
Required Documents:
Valid Taxi Clearance Certificate, CK, Certified BEE Verification Certificate, Proof of Company Residence, Compliance to Tender Specifications, Letter of Financial Good Standing
Payment:
Non-refundable R350.00
Submission Location:
Tender Box B, Central Office, Stand No 203, Sibasa
Evaluation Criteria:
80/20 scoring points
Delivery Location:
Mashamba Campus
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Mumbai, India
Topic:
Education, Alumni Services
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization:
Tata Institute of Social Sciences
Author:
TISS-SSE
Target Audience:
Alumni
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Not specified
Topic:
Academic paper template
Document Type:
Template
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Researchers, academics, authors submitting manuscripts
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Kyoto
Theme:
Admissions
Document type:
Evaluation form
Organization / institution:
Kyoto iUP Admissions Office
Author:
Kyoto iUP Admissions Office
Target audience:
Secondary/high school applicants and evaluators
Period of validity:
Until applicants’ screening results are announced
Approval date:
N/A
Modification date:
N/A