№ files_lp_3_process_9_32057
File format: docx
Character count: 5626
File size: 24 KB
Curriculum framework and assessment rubric outlining the structure, learning outcomes, evaluation criteria, and instructional guidelines, including generative AI considerations, for undergraduate communication courses within a university general education program.
Institution:
Utah State University
Program:
General Education and University Studies in Communication
Curriculum Structure:
Communications Literacy 1 (CL1), Communications Literacy 2 (CL2), Communications Intensive (CI)
Course Level:
Lower-division (CL), Upper-division (CI)
Focus Areas:
Written communication, Oral communication, Information literacy, Disciplinary conventions
Document Type:
Curriculum framework and assessment rubric
Evaluation Method:
Rubric-based proficiency milestones (CI, CL2, CL1)
Proposal Requirements:
Memo with syllabus reference explaining alignment with stated criteria and outcomes
Instructional Guidance:
Integration of Generative AI as a teaching tool with limitations
Audience:
Faculty proposing or teaching CI/CL courses
Academic Context:
Undergraduate general education sequence
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
USA
Topic:
Writing guidelines, Document formatting
Document type:
Guide
Author:
Andrea Snarr
Target Audience:
Writers preparing documents for HTML publishing
Date of approval:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Logan, Utah
Subject:
Employee safety, injury reporting, and medical procedure
Document Type:
Procedure
Organization:
USU Facilities
Author:
USU Facilities Safety Manager
Target Audience:
All Facilities Employees
Period of Validity:
Indefinite
Approval Date:
8/29/2017
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2025-2026
Region / City:
Utah
Theme:
Student Organizations, Clubs, and Leadership
Document Type:
Student Handbook
Organization:
Utah State University College of Veterinary Medicine (USU CVM)
Author:
USU CVM
Target Audience:
USU CVM Students
Period of Validity:
Academic Year 2025-2026
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Institution:
Utah State University
Program:
Secondary Teacher Education Program (STEP)
Type of document:
Checklist / Program Guide
Audience:
Prospective secondary education teachers
Admission deadlines:
Fall admission for Spring classes - October 1, Spring admission for Fall classes - March 1
Program requirements:
Good academic standing (2.0 GPA), USBE background check, completion of core courses, foreign language proficiency for relevant majors/minors
Courses included:
SCED 3210, ITLS 2500, SCED 3300, SCED 4300, SCED 5100, SCED 5200, SCED 5210, SPED 4000, content methods courses
Student teaching deadlines:
Fall - March 1, Spring - October 1
Advising contacts:
Major advisor, minor advisor, TEAL advisor, statewide campus contact [email protected]
Clinical experience:
Required for certain courses with 30 hours per semester in classrooms
Application portal:
eGrad and Banner
Document type:
Evaluation form and grading rubric
Program code:
FSG604
Assessment components:
Written report, log book, oral presentation
Assessment weightage:
Written report 20%, log book 10%, oral presentation 20%
Total marks per component:
25
Assessment criteria:
Structure and quality, introduction and background, contents and findings, conclusion and recommendation, references and appendices, organization background, task and project, impact of training, question and answer
Institutional role:
Industrial training coordinator
Coordinator name:
Mohd Azizi Nawawi
Contact method:
Email submission
Intended users:
Evaluators and students undergoing industrial training
Context of use:
Industrial training assessment
Evaluation scale:
Very Weak to Very Good
Language of instruction:
English
Academic context:
Industrial training programme assessment
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Atlanta, Georgia
Subject:
Arts, Design, Individuals & Societies, Language Acquisition, Language and Literature, Mathematics, Physical & Health Education, Sciences
Document Type:
Assessment Rubrics
Institution:
Maynard H Jackson High School
Audience:
Students, Educators, School Administrators
Period of Validity:
Academic Year 2023-2024
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Last Revision:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Whiteboard frame design, joint selection, and woodworking evaluation
Document Type:
Educational rubric, design guidelines
Institution / Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students in construction/woodworking courses
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Southwest
Theme:
Education, Curriculum Development
Document Type:
Presentation
Author:
Robbin Clark
Organization:
Utah School for the Blind
Target Audience:
Educators and Instructional Designers
Date Approved:
2023
Date Modified:
N/A
Title:
Math 20 Foundations Textbook
Course:
Math 20 Foundations
Subject:
Mathematics
Level:
Secondary Education
Components:
Table of Contents, Outcomes, Assessment Rubrics, Practice Exercises
Outcomes Codes:
FM20.1, FM20.2
Topics:
Inductive and deductive reasoning, rates, scale factor, surface area and volume, properties of angles, laws of sine and cosine, normal distribution, statistical reasoning, linear inequalities, optimization problems, quadratic functions
Assessment Levels:
Intervention 1, Instructional 2, Independence 3, Mastery 4
Intended Audience:
Students enrolled in Math 20 Foundations
Document Type:
Educational textbook with assessment rubrics and practice exercises
Structure:
Outcome-based curriculum with performance criteria and level descriptors
Year:
2026
Region / City:
New Jersey, US
Subject:
Mathematics
Document Type:
Answer key and scoring rubrics
Organization:
New Jersey Department of Education
Intended Audience:
Teachers and exam graders
Courses Covered:
Algebra 1, Geometry
Units Included:
Unit 1, Unit 2
Scoring System:
Full and partial credit with rubrics
Content Alignment:
Integrated course standards (A-APR, F-IF, G-CO, etc.)
Institution:
Forman Christian College University
Department:
Department of Computer Science
Location:
Lahore, Pakistan
Document Type:
Academic proposal template and evaluation rubric
Academic Level:
Undergraduate (Final Year Project)
Components:
Proposal structure guidelines; Defense evaluation form; Assessment rubrics
Evaluation Criteria:
Subject Knowledge; Organization and Content of Presentation; Problem Statement; Literature Review; Project Overview and Methodology; Language and Grammar; Delivery and Presentation Skills; Work Division
Referenced Tools:
EndNote; Mendelay; Jabref
Intended Audience:
Final year undergraduate students and faculty evaluators
Proposal Sections:
Abstract; Introduction; Problem Statement; Literature Review; Project Overview/Goal; Project Development Methodology/Architecture; Project Milestones and Deliverables; Work Division; Costing; References
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Canada
Subject:
Language Assessment
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization:
Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks
Author:
Various Authors
Target Audience:
Teachers and Language Programs
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
2019
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Grade:
8
Subject:
Islamic Religious Education
Assessment Number:
………………………
Date:
………………………
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Kenya
Document Type:
Assessment Rubrics
Organization / Institution:
Kenya Junior Schools
Author:
………………………
Target Audience:
Students of Grade 8
Effective Period:
2023
Approval Date:
………………………
Amendment Date:
………………………
Note:
Year
Year:
2026
Region / Institution:
Educational settings, general
Subject:
Academic assessment and grading
Document type:
Instructional guide / template
Author:
Educational design team
Intended audience:
Instructors, teachers, and assessment designers
Assessment focus:
Creating rubrics and grading criteria
Components included:
Criteria definition, weighting, achievement levels, sample rubric
Usage period:
2026 onward
Planning Prompts and Rubrics for a Physical Education Lesson on Underhand Striking Skill Development
Subject:
Physical Education
Topic:
Underhand striking skill and movement concepts in educational games
Document Type:
Instructional planning prompts and rubric guidelines
Educational Domain:
Psychomotor and Cognitive Learning
Skill Focus:
Underhand striking toward targets
Movement Concepts:
Target level (high/low) and distance (near/far)
Instructional Context:
Physical education lesson planning
Assessment Framework:
Planning prompts with rubric criteria
Referenced Artifacts:
Lesson plan, instructional materials, assessments
Learning Domains Addressed:
Psychomotor domain and cognitive domain
Educational Standard Referenced:
Physical Education Standard 1 and Standard 2
Taxonomy Reference:
Bloom’s Taxonomy – Application level
Primary Activity Structure:
Learning experiences with progressive practice and extensions
Target Activity Type:
Educational striking game with target zones
Year:
2011
Region:
Saskatchewan, Canada
Subject:
Mathematics
Document Type:
Educational assessment guidelines
Institutions:
Prairie South School Division, Saskatchewan Rivers School Division, Chinook School Division, Sun West School Division, South East Cornerstone School Division, Holy Trinity Catholic School Division, Greater Saskatoon Catholic Schools, Regina Public Schools, Christ the Teacher Catholic School Division, Prairie Valley School Division, Regina Catholic Schools, Light of Christ Catholic School Division
Authors:
Tim Eirich, David Hall, Laurie Hawkins, Yasmina Lemieux, Amanda McCann, Lorne Polupski, Sophie Rosso, Ward Strueby, Sheila Cunningham, Jennifer Gustafson, Darlana Harding, Kami Hodgins, Jacqueline Johnson, Angie Lysitza, Tracy Bell, Bev Burgess, Ed Varjassy, Shirley Barclay, Amelia Davidson, Danielle Jamieson, Shirley Jones, Shannon Libke, Vanessa Lewis, Shari Martin, Virginia Mireau, Maureen Ryan-Dobbin, Linda Varty, Tasha Fletcher, Jenna Mains, Karla Warren, Susan Wilson, Yvette Beutel, Michael Laskowski, Darcy Todos, Karen Boire, Diane Coté, Claire McTavish, Maria Monteiro, Doug Schmitz, Ron Sirois, Diana Sproat, Anna Thompson, Bonnie Brennan, Tamara Chernenkoff, Shirley Sefton, Laurel Marzolf, Lora Mazur, Jacquie Meyer, Shirley Riddle, Kristine Woiden, Carol Youck-Cousins, Richard Donnelly, Wade McLean, Charlene Rudderham, Jason Howse, Pat Kindrachuk, Bob Phillips, Jennifer Reid-Vandevord, Lori Saigeon, Joanne Yeo, LJ Dowell-Hantelmann, Becky Anderson, Karen Hrabinsky, Laura Keller, Carol Oke, Isabelle Richard, Annette Klevgaard, Cathy Wallace, Daphne Yates
Purpose:
Standardize assessment practices, identify student needs, support collaborative decision-making, provide evidence for outcomes-based grading
Assessment Type:
Pre-assessment and post-assessment
Administration Time:
Pre-assessment up to 30 minutes, Post-assessment up to 45 minutes
Materials Required:
Examination booklet, pencil, accommodations as needed
Achievement Levels:
Level 1 – Beginning, Level 2 – Approaching, Level 3 – Proficiency, Level 4 – Mastery
Scoring:
Correct/incorrect; rubric-based; no points system
Target Audience:
Teachers, school administrators, students
VALUE Rubrics for Assessing Critical Thinking and Other Learning Outcomes in Undergraduate Education
Year:
2026
Region / Country:
United States
Subject:
Higher Education, Student Learning Assessment
Document Type:
Rubric / Educational Framework
Institution / Organization:
Association of American Colleges & Universities
Authors:
Faculty experts from multiple U.S. colleges and universities
Target Audience:
Higher education faculty and institutional administrators
Scope:
Undergraduate programs across disciplines
Learning Outcomes Covered:
Critical Thinking, Quantitative Literacy, Written Communication, etc.
Intended Use:
Institutional-level evaluation and discussion of student learning, not grading
Development Method:
Review of existing campus rubrics, faculty feedback, and iterative refinement
Number of Rubrics:
15
Implementation Notes:
Rubrics adaptable to campus, disciplinary, and course contexts