№ files_lp_4_process_2_56942
File format: docx
Character count: 2859
File size: 21 KB
The document is an opinion editorial urging for the continuation of federal funding for afterschool programs, highlighting their importance for students, families, and businesses, and warning about the potential consequences of proposed budget cuts.
Year:
2018
Region / City:
STATE
Theme:
Education, Youth Programs, Budget Cuts
Document Type:
Opinion Editorial
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Government
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Parents, Educators, Policymakers, General Public
Action Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Note:
Year
Region / city:
Burlington, NC
Topic:
Safety procedures for saw operation
Document type:
Safety analysis
Organization:
City of Burlington
Author:
Safety Director Tommy Simmons
Target audience:
Employees using the saw
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization / Institution:
Board of Examiners
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Global
Theme:
Food loss, waste reduction, climate change, malnutrition
Document Type:
Proposal guidelines
Organization:
CCAC (Climate and Clean Air Coalition)
Author:
CCAC Secretariat
Target audience:
Applicants for the Food & Nutrition Challenge
Period of validity:
2025-2026
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Document code:
WI-NET-CAB-011
Document type:
Assembly instruction
Subject:
Cable jointing and pot-end installation
Cable type:
4 core Wavecon
Application:
Main distributor cable 95, 185 and 300 mm²
Permitted status:
Live and dead jointing
Joint kits covered:
TE Connectivity Joint Kit; Sicame Joint Kit
Manufacturer:
TE Connectivity; Sicame
Materials referenced:
Resin, joint shells, earth electrode kit, earth rod
Safety framework:
Work Element Processes (WEP) per TG-NET-CAB-017
Related catalogues:
Joints and Accessories Catalogue TG-NET-CAB-411
Author:
Atif Haq
Checked by:
Chris Sterling
Approved by:
John Baker
Revision:
2.00
Revision date:
14.12.2021
Revision history:
Converted to new format and updated to include Sicame LV Joint Kit
Source type:
Technical instruction
Date:
13 Aug 2025
Document Type:
Order Confirmation
Supplier:
Enviroclad
Client:
Arctic Installations (SA) Pty Ltd
Client Contact:
Gary Fullwood
Client Address:
1/19 Chamberlain St, Wingfield SA 5013
Prepared By:
Amanda-Jane Burnim
Position:
Office / Production Co-Ordinator
Contact Email:
[email protected]
Contact Phone:
1300 003 009
Items:
Insulated EPS/FR Panels CW 100mm and 150mm, Cut Sheets, Accessories
Total ex GST:
$5,880.48
GST:
$588.05
Total inc GST:
$6,468.53
Lead Time:
2 weeks plus delivery
Delivery Terms:
Adelaide Metro; heavy vehicle access required
Warranty:
Enviroclad Product Warranty on Enviropanel and Envirospan
Terms and Conditions:
Pricing excludes GST unless stated otherwise; client responsible for order verification and site suitability; waiting time charges apply
Confidentiality Notice:
Information confidential and intended for the addressee only
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Manchester
Theme:
Art, Social Issues, Interactive Experience
Document Type:
Event Programme
Organization / Institution:
Manchester International Festival, Factory International
Author:
Blast Theory, Manchester Street Poem
Target Audience:
General Public
Period of Activity:
29 June – 16 July 2023
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Date:
23 Sep 2024
Document Type:
Sales Order
Customer:
Spencer Budarick
Customer Organization:
IKC Industries Pty Ltd
Customer Address:
12 Craig Hill Road, Stanley Flat SA 5453
Customer Email:
[email protected]
Customer Phone:
0408859159
Supplier:
Enviroclad
Supplier Contact Person:
Amanda-Jane Burnim
Supplier Position:
Office / Production Co-Ordinator
Supplier Phone:
1300 003 009
Supplier Email:
[email protected]
Products:
Insulated EPS/FR Panel - CW / CW 50mm .6; Cut Sheets; Accessories
Total Panel Area:
115.92m2
Subtotal:
$7,217.56 ex GST
GST:
$721.76
Total Amount:
$7,939.32 inc GST
Lead Time:
1 week plus delivery
Pricing Validity:
30 days unless material price increase exceeds 5%
Freight Terms:
Third Party Freight; claims lodged by Enviroclad without responsibility for outcome
Jurisdiction:
Australia
Year:
2020
Region / City:
United States, Atlanta, Georgia
Subject:
Tobacco education, smoking cessation
Document Type:
Information Collection Request
Organization / Agency:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health
Author / Contact:
Michelle O’Hegarty, PhD
Target Audience:
Adult smokers and nonsmokers aged 18–54
Data Collection Method:
Online survey through Toluna panel
Sample Size:
21,330 respondents
Subpopulations:
Young adult smokers (18–26), older adult smokers (27–54), young adult nonsmokers (18–26), older adult nonsmokers (27–54), low-SES smokers, non-low-SES smokers
Purpose:
Testing rough cut television advertisements for the Tips From Former Smokers® campaign
OMB Control Number:
0920-0910
Period of Data Collection:
Pre-launch testing of campaign ads
Attachments:
Online questionnaire, email invitations, recruitment screener, main screenshots, Toluna terms and conditions, Battelle IRB approval, Toluna privacy policy
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Not specified
Topic:
Chemistry lab equipment
Document type:
Instructional exercise
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Students or learners of chemistry
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Change date:
Not specified
Context:
This document is an instructional exercise for identifying and matching the names of chemistry lab equipment with their descriptions.
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Amanda, Ohio
Theme:
Utility permits, street work, construction
Document Type:
Application form
Organization / Institution:
Village of Amanda
Author:
Village of Amanda, Ohio
Target Audience:
Utility companies, contractors
Context:
Form used by utility companies and contractors to request a permit for street work or right-of-way projects in the Village of Amanda, Ohio.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Accra, Ghana
Topic:
Cocoa pricing and political response
Document Type:
News article
Organization / Institution:
Ghana News Agency
Author:
Godwill Arthur-Mensah, Elsie Appiah-Osei
Target Audience:
General public, cocoa farmers
Date of publication:
February 12, 2026
Subject:
Call for dismissal of COCOBOD CEO
Event Date:
February 9, 2026
Price change:
28.6% reduction in producer price of cocoa
New producer price:
GH¢41,392 per tonne, GH¢2,587 per bag
Political context:
Response from New Patriotic Party Minority Caucus in Parliament
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Arlington, VA; St. Louis, MO; Salt Lake City, UT; Orlando, FL
Topic:
Media Asset Management System Integration
Document Type:
Technical specifications
Organization / Institution:
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Author:
VA OI&T
Target Audience:
VA IT and MAM integration teams
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Year:
2025-2026
Region / City:
Eastern USA
Theme:
Swimming competition times
Document Type:
List
Organization:
Eastern Swim League
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Swimmers, Coaches, Swimming Event Organizers
Effective Period:
2025-2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025–2026
Event:
Australian International Documentary Conference 2026
Program:
Cut to the Chase
Document Type:
Submission Guidelines
Organization:
Australian International Documentary Conference (AIDC)
Region:
Australia / International
Submission Opening Date:
30 October 2025, 09:00 (AEDT)
Submission Deadline:
23 January 2026, 23:59 (AEDT)
Late Submission Deadline:
30 January 2026, 23:59 (AEDT)
Event Dates (In-Person Meetings):
2–5 March 2026
Event Dates (International Online Market):
11–12 March 2026
Eligible Applicants:
Key creatives with AIDC 2026 Business Pass or All Access Pass
Submission Fee:
None
Maximum Submissions:
Two projects per pass holder
Project Types:
Screen projects and audio documentary projects
Participants:
Producers, broadcasters, streamers, sales agents, distributors, production companies, funds, festivals and markets
Submission Platform:
MY AIDC account portal
Contact Email:
[email protected]
Year:
2025-26
Region / City:
Victoria, Australia
Topic:
Local Government Budgeting
Document Type:
Guide
Agency / Institution:
Local Government Victoria
Author:
Local Government Victoria
Target Audience:
Local government finance professionals
Effective Period:
2025-26
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Nepal
Theme:
Budget Allocation, Public Health
Document Type:
Terms of Reference
Organization / Institution:
Action Against Hunger (ACF) Nepal
Author:
Action Against Hunger (ACF) Nepal
Target Audience:
Consultants, Health and Nutrition Policy Experts, Government Entities
Period of Activity:
December 20, 2025 – February 20, 2026
Approval Date:
December 2025
Date of Changes:
N/A
Note:
Fiscal Year
Requires Legislation:
☐ Yes ☐ No
Trailer Bill Language:
☐ Yes ☐ No
Budget Bill Language:
☐ Yes ☐ No
Other Department Concurrence:
☐ Yes ☐ No
Year:
2025
Region / City:
[State/District]
Topic:
Federal Budget Cuts, School Meals, Food Insecurity
Document Type:
Letter
Author:
[Your Name]
Target Audience:
School District Leaders, Superintendents, Principals, Business Officials
Period of Action:
2025 and Beyond
Approval Date:
[Date of letter]
Date of Changes:
[If applicable]