№ files_lp_4_process_1_31000
File format: docx
Character count: 1946
File size: 21 KB
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Amanda, Ohio
Theme:
Utility permits, street work, construction
Document Type:
Application form
Organization / Institution:
Village of Amanda
Author:
Village of Amanda, Ohio
Target Audience:
Utility companies, contractors
Context:
Form used by utility companies and contractors to request a permit for street work or right-of-way projects in the Village of Amanda, Ohio.
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Wisconsin
Subject:
Utility facility construction and maintenance permits
Document type:
Application/Permit
Authority:
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Author:
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Target audience:
Utility facility owners
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Department:
Engineering
Reports To:
Manager, Right-of-Way Operations
Classifications:
Non-Bargaining Unit, Exempt, Senior Staff, Bargaining Unit, Non-Exempt
Supervises:
n/a
Position Summary:
Secure and document right-of-way easements and permits, verify land ownership, and assist with related field and office tasks
Experience/Education:
High school diploma or equivalent, associate degree in surveying technology or equivalent experience, valid Michigan driver’s license, notary appointment or ability to obtain, proficiency with position-specific software and equipment, Microsoft Office competency
Essential Duties/Responsibilities:
Investigate land ownership, identify boundaries, explain easements, resolve disputes, prepare documents, assist departments with easement and permit processes
Required Skills:
English proficiency, critical thinking, active listening, reading comprehension, active learning, problem solving, coordination, instructing, service orientation, judgment and decision making, time management, social perceptiveness, learning strategies, persuasion, negotiation, project management, mathematics
Required Attributes:
Diplomacy, oral comprehension, speech recognition, written comprehension, spatial orientation, near and far vision, depth perception, time sharing, memorization, selective attention, problem sensitivity
Note:
Year
Subject:
Utility installation permit application
Document Type:
Instruction Manual
Organization / Institution:
Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT)
Author:
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Target Audience:
Utility facility owners, contractors, municipalities
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Kingman County, Kansas
Subject:
Public works construction and maintenance on county right-of-way
Document Type:
Application
Organization / Institution:
Kingman County Department of Public Works
Author:
Kingman County Department of Public Works
Target Audience:
Contractors, developers, and public works officials
Period of Validity:
Ongoing, specific to project
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Type of Document:
Appraisal report / template form
Jurisdiction/Regulatory Reference:
49 CFR Part 24.103; FAA Advisory Circular 150/5100-17; FAA Order 5100.37B; USPAP Standard Rule 2-2
Purpose:
Valuation for right-of-way acquisition and/or easements for airport project
Intended User:
Right of way acquisition entity (not specified)
Property Type:
Land parcel (with possible easements and remainder)
Valuation Basis:
Fair market value (Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions definition)
Property Interest:
Fee simple estate or leased fee estate (as applicable)
Acquisition Types Covered:
Fee taking, permanent easement, temporary easement, dedication/perpetual easement, other
Report Options:
Appraisal Report or Restricted Appraisal Report (USPAP)
Appraisal Complexity:
Non-complex or complex (49 CFR Part 24.103)
Effective Date of Appraisal:
(blank field)
Date of Report:
(blank field)
Date of Signature:
(blank field)
Appraiser:
(blank field)
License Type/No./Expiration:
(blank fields)
Location/Address:
(blank field)
Parcel/Unit/County:
(blank fields)
Property Area:
Whole property, areas acquired (fee, easements, ROW), remainder (blank fields)
Valuation Results Fields:
Fair market value of whole property; value of taken portion; value of remainder before and after taking; damages to remainder; compensation for easements; total compensation (blank fields)
Farmland Preservation Act Codes:
CL, OC, HL, PL, FL, FS, RL, OL (check boxes)
End of Form Sections:
Scope of work, assumptions/conditions, owner interview, inspection invitation/acceptance (blank fields)
Year:
2017
Region / City:
Wisconsin
Topic:
Utility installation permits on state highways
Document Type:
Instructional guide
Agency / Organization:
Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT)
Author:
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Target Audience:
Utility owners, municipal authorities
Period of Action:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
07/2017
Date of Changes:
N/A
Contextual Description:
Instructional guide for utility owners applying for permits to install, operate, and maintain utility facilities within highway right-of-way areas in Wisconsin.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Various counties
Theme:
Roadway design, Right-of-Way, Drainage
Document Type:
Design and planning document
Organization / Institution:
Transportation Department
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
Transportation engineers, project managers, consultants
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Clay County, Minnesota, USA
Document Type:
Draft Compatibility Determination
Subject:
Right-of-way permit for utility line installation
Organization / Authority:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Refuge:
Northern Tallgrass Prairie National Wildlife Refuge
Refuge Use Category:
Right-of-way and Right to Access
Refuge Use Type:
Right-of-way (utility)
Duration of Permit:
50 years
Construction Period:
Spring, Summer, or Fall 2023
Construction Method:
Plowing underground utility line
Environmental Considerations:
Native prairie habitat preservation, minimal disturbance
Note:
Year
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Navarro County, Texas, USA
Type of Document:
Legal easement agreement
Agency:
United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development
Form Number:
RD 442-20(Rev. 10-96)
Grantor:
[Name redacted in original document]
Grantee:
Corbet Water Supply
Purpose:
Installation, operation, and maintenance of a water line
Width of Easement:
15 feet
Signatures:
Grantor, Notary Public
Endorsement:
Perpetual easement with rights of ingress and egress
Note:
Year
Topic:
Wireless Communications, Public Infrastructure
Document Type:
Ordinance
Contextual Description:
Model ordinance for wireless communications facilities installation and management within public rights-of-way, outlining definitions and regulations for the placement of wireless infrastructure.
Year:
2012
Region / City:
Indiana
Theme:
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), accessibility standards
Document Type:
Resolution
Organization / Institution:
County/City/Town of Indiana
Author:
Commissioners of County/City/Town
Target Audience:
Municipal officials, planners, accessibility professionals
Action Date:
September 18, 2012
Date of Adoption:
September 18, 2012
Context:
Legal source document outlining the adoption of ADA accessibility guidelines for public facilities and pedestrian areas in compliance with federal regulations.
Year:
2002
Region / City:
Michigan
Subject:
Telecommunications
Document Type:
Permit
Issuing Authority:
Municipality
Author:
Municipality
Target Audience:
Telecommunications Providers
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
12/06/02
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Topic:
Right-of-Way Camera Technology
Document Type:
Technical Paper
Author:
Cyrus Minwalla, Hitesh Shah, Damion Orsi
Target Audience:
Professionals in mobile mapping and road condition assessment
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Contextual description:
A technical paper analyzing the challenges and decisions in developing high-performance right-of-way cameras for mobile mapping systems used in road condition assessment and asset extraction.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Note:
Year
Region / city:
Burlington, NC
Topic:
Safety procedures for saw operation
Document type:
Safety analysis
Organization:
City of Burlington
Author:
Safety Director Tommy Simmons
Target audience:
Employees using the saw
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization / Institution:
Board of Examiners
Year:
2025
Region / city:
Global
Theme:
Food loss, waste reduction, climate change, malnutrition
Document Type:
Proposal guidelines
Organization:
CCAC (Climate and Clean Air Coalition)
Author:
CCAC Secretariat
Target audience:
Applicants for the Food & Nutrition Challenge
Period of validity:
2025-2026
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Document code:
WI-NET-CAB-011
Document type:
Assembly instruction
Subject:
Cable jointing and pot-end installation
Cable type:
4 core Wavecon
Application:
Main distributor cable 95, 185 and 300 mm²
Permitted status:
Live and dead jointing
Joint kits covered:
TE Connectivity Joint Kit; Sicame Joint Kit
Manufacturer:
TE Connectivity; Sicame
Materials referenced:
Resin, joint shells, earth electrode kit, earth rod
Safety framework:
Work Element Processes (WEP) per TG-NET-CAB-017
Related catalogues:
Joints and Accessories Catalogue TG-NET-CAB-411
Author:
Atif Haq
Checked by:
Chris Sterling
Approved by:
John Baker
Revision:
2.00
Revision date:
14.12.2021
Revision history:
Converted to new format and updated to include Sicame LV Joint Kit
Source type:
Technical instruction