№ files_lp_3_process_7_005836
File format: docx
Character count: 12322
File size: 176 KB
Datix ID Number:
843
Note:
Health & Care Standard
HBR Ref Number:
3
Risk Target Date:
31/03/2026
Current Risk Rating:
4 x 4 = 16
Objective:
The Health Board is a great place to work where staff feel valued and work together towards a common goal
BAF Ref:
5
Director Lead:
Tina Ricketts, Director of Workforce and OD
Assuring Committee:
Workforce & OD Committee
Risk:
Recruitment of consultant medical & dental staff in hard to fill roles
Date last reviewed:
Jun 2025
Risk Rating (consequence x likelihood):
Initial: 5 x 4 = 20, Current: 4 x 4 = 16, Target: 4 x 3 = 12
Rationale for current score:
National shortages of numbers in some areas
Level of Control:
70%
Rationale for target score:
This remains a challenge and is also a national problem
Date added to the SBU HB risk register:
April 2019
Scope Refreshed:
Jan 2024
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Datix ID Number:
738
Health & Care Standard:
HBR Ref Number: 1
Risk Target Date:
31/12/2025
Objective:
Urgent & Emergency Care (UEC)
Director Lead:
Deb Lewis, Chief Operating Officer
Assuring Committee:
Performance & Finance Committee
Risk:
Access to Unscheduled Care
Date last reviewed:
Jun 2025
Risk Rating:
Initial: 4 x 5 = 20 Current: 4 x 4 = 16 Target: 3 x 4 = 12
Rationale for current score:
The UEC system continues to see high demand, with ambulance attendances higher than seen previously. However, this demand has been mitigated by improvement activity across the hospital resulting in improved flow away from ED.
Level of Control:
50%
Rationale for target score:
The HB is currently under escalating performance monitoring from WG (Targeted Intervention or TI) for delivery of UEC services.
Date added to the SBU HB risk register:
Apr 2019
Controls:
Mitigating actions, Five main areas of work within the plan: Frailty strategy, Grip & control operational management, Senior decision makers at front door services, Pathway of care delays, Implementation of Discharge-To-Reassess (D2RA), Home First, Acute Care Team (ACT).
Assurances:
UEC Redesign meetings, UEC Summit meetings, D2RA Executive meeting.
Gaps in assurance:
Affordability of the UEC Care Co-ordination Hub pending approval of WG Six Goals funding.
Year:
2008-09 to 2013-14 (up to October 2013)
Date of reply:
5-12-2013
Parliamentary body:
Rajya Sabha
Question number:
114 (Unstarred)
Members raising the question:
Shrimati T. Ratna Bai and Shri Mohd. Ali Khan
Subject:
Budgets allocated and utilized for National Highways and Bridges
Geographical coverage:
States and Union Territories of India
Implementing agencies:
National Highways Authority of India (NHAI); Border Road Organisations (BRO); Ministry of Road Transport & Highways (MORTH)
Funds covered:
NH(O), Cess, Toll, Permanent Bridge Fee Fund (PBFF)
Financial units:
Rupees in crore
Content:
Allocation and expenditure for development, maintenance and repair of National Highways; road construction targets and achievements in kilometres
Type of document:
Parliamentary annexures with financial and performance statements
Version:
2.1
Last updated date:
05/02/2026
Last updated by:
William Liu
Country:
Scotland, United Kingdom
Sector:
Medical regulation and professional appraisal
Topic:
Medical appraisal and revalidation training
Document type:
Training course workbook
Institutional context:
NHS appraisal system
Related organisation:
General Medical Council (GMC)
Target audience:
Newly allocated medical appraiser training participants
Structure:
Six training modules with reflection exercises and resources
Modules included:
Appraisal Overview in Scotland; Supporting Information; PDP and Form 4; Appraiser Skills; Using a Coaching Approach in Appraisals; Challenging Appraisal Situations
Associated resources:
Medical Appraisal Scotland website, GMC guidance on supporting information for revalidation, simulated appraisal videos, Form 4 guidance
Purpose within training:
Pre-course preparation, reflection, and note-taking for assessed appraiser training
Assessment note:
Tutor panel assesses readiness of participants to undertake the role of appraiser
Year:
2012
Region / City:
Bangkok
Subject:
Badminton
Document Type:
Council Decision
Organization:
BWF
Author:
Thomas Lund
Target Audience:
Badminton Federations, Sports Organizers
Effective Period:
2014-2017
Approval Date:
November 30, 2012
Modification Date:
N/A
Contextual description:
Decision document outlining the allocation of World Super Series Tournaments to the Badminton Association of India for the years 2014-2017.
Note:
Year
Institution:
Bath Spa University
Target Audience:
Staff, students, and event organizers
Document type:
Administrative form
Subject area:
Health ethics and governance
Jurisdiction:
New South Wales, Australia
Issuing body:
NSW Health
Related guideline:
GL2007_020 Quality Improvement & Ethical Review: A Practice Guide for NSW
Applicable activities:
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement projects
Review pathway:
SESLHD Research Office and Low and Negligible Risk Ethics Committee
Target users:
Health professionals undertaking QA/QI activities
Submission method:
Email to SESLHD Research Office
Sections included:
Ethical Risks Checklist, Project Summary, Risk Management
Form parts:
Part A and Part B
Governing policy framework:
NSW Health ethics review policy
Project title:
Institutionalization of adaptation planning and integration of climate risks into Kazakhstan’s development planning processes
Implementing Partner:
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
Execution Modality:
Direct Implementation Modality (DIM)
UNDAF/Country Programme Outcome:
Outcome 3.2 – By 2025, all people in Kazakhstan, in particular the most vulnerable, benefit from increased climate resilience, sustainable management of the environment and clean energy, and sustainable rural and urban development
UNDP Strategic Plan Output:
1.1, 2.3.1
UNDP Social and Environmental Screening Category:
EXEMPT LOW
UNDP Gender Marker:
GEN2
Atlas Quantum Project Award ID:
1212335
Atlas Quantum Output Project ID:
01001614
UNDP PIMS ID number:
5965
GCF ID number:
KAZ-RS-003
Planned start date:
29 November 2023
Planned end date:
29 February 2028
Financing Plan:
GCF grant USD 2,763,763; Total Budget administered by UNDP USD 2,763,763
Beneficiaries:
Key government ministries, decision-makers, business planners, climate and sectoral experts, women and vulnerable groups
Priority sectors:
Agriculture, forestry, water management, civil protection/disaster risk reduction
Objectives:
Strengthen governance, produce evidence for adaptation, catalyze private sector engagement, increase adaptation finance
Signatories:
Yerlan Nyssanbayev, Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources of the Republic of Kazakhstan; Katarzyna Wawiernia, UNDP Resident Representative
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Fiji
Theme:
Climate change, disaster risk management, urban settlements
Document Type:
Project Proposal
Institution:
United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat)
Author:
UN-Habitat
Target Audience:
Governments, development agencies, urban planners, climate change advocates
Period of Activity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2018
Region:
New South Wales, Australia
Topic:
Modern slavery risk management in procurement
Document type:
Guidance template / Tender schedule
Agency:
NSW Government
Legal reference:
Modern Slavery Act 2018 (NSW)
Intended audience:
Government agencies and suppliers
Related international standards:
UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
Year:
2018
Region / city:
Australia
Topic:
Modern Slavery Risk Assessment
Document type:
Questionnaire
Organization / institution:
Australian Government
Author:
Australian Government
Target audience:
Australian Government agencies, suppliers
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / city:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Nuclear safety regulation, risk assessment, ALARP
Document type:
Technical guidance
Organization:
Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR)
Author:
ONR
Target audience:
Nuclear safety inspectors
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Contextual description:
Template for planning and managing risks in school curriculum activities with guidelines for supervision, student requirements, emergency procedures, and safety measures.
Year:
2011
Region / City:
United States
Subject:
Fire safety, health care kitchens
Document Type:
Checklist
Organization / Institution:
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Health care facility staff, safety inspectors
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2013
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Topic:
Risk assessment, gas pipelines, safety
Document type:
Standard
Organization / Institution:
Institution of Gas Engineers and Managers (IGEM)
Author:
IGEM Gas Transmission and Distribution Committee
Target audience:
Pipeline operators, planners, engineers
Validity period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Amendment date:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / city:
North Central Texas
Theme:
Household Hazardous Waste Management
Document Type:
White Paper
Author:
North Central Texas Council of Governments
Target Audience:
City Managers, Local Government Personnel
Action Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
May 1, 2025
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Ethics, Research, Clinical Trials
Document Type:
Report Form
Organ / Institution:
Parkway Independent Ethics Committee (PIEC)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Research investigators, ethics committee members
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Melbourne, Australia
Theme:
Safety procedures, Risk management
Document type:
Procedure
Agency / Institution:
Melbourne Water
Target audience:
Melbourne Water employees working in lone, isolated, or remote situations
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Risk acknowledgment for participation in activities
Document type:
Agreement
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Participants in the activity
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2019
Region / city:
United States
Topic:
National Register of Historic Places regulations
Document Type:
Comment Letter
Organization / institution:
American Institute of Architects (AIA), Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation
Author:
Kara Kempski, Sara C. Bronin
Target Audience:
Government officials, preservationists, architects, and public stakeholders
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Amendments:
N/A