№ files_lp_3_process_9_70506
File format: docx
Character count: 2334
File size: 92 KB
Administrative academic form recording student declaration, supervisory verification, and institutional compliance checks for submission of a doctoral thesis prior to the viva voce examination.
Institution:
British University in Dubai (BUiD)
Document type:
Academic administrative form
Purpose:
Submission and verification of PhD thesis prior to viva voce examination
Related submission email:
[email protected]
Sections:
Student declaration; Director of Studies verification; Library Services formatting check
Requirements:
Proofreading certificate; Turnitin plagiarism report; Compliance with University formatting guidelines
Policy reference:
University Policy on Academic Honesty
Responsible parties:
Student; Director of Studies (DoS); Library Services officer
Submission deadline:
At least three months before the intended viva voce examination date
Applies to:
PhD candidates submitting thesis for examination
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
University Procedure: UP18/3 Examination of Higher Degree by Research Candidates including Viva Voce
Year:
2024
Region / city:
Western Australia
Theme:
Higher Degree by Research examination procedure
Document type:
University procedure
Institution:
The University of Western Australia
Author:
The University of Western Australia
Target audience:
HDR students, supervisors, examiners, Graduate Research School
Effective period:
Ongoing
Approval date:
24 April 2024
Year:
2020
Region / City:
United Kingdom
Subject:
Postgraduate research, viva examinations, Covid-19 pandemic
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization:
Graduate School, Glasgow Caledonian University
Author:
Lyle Gray, Chair RDC; Cam Donaldson, PVC Research
Target Audience:
Postgraduate research students, supervisors, academic staff
Period of validity:
2020-2021
Date of approval:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Theme:
Occupational Competence Validation, Apprenticeship Assessment
Document Type:
Guideline
Target Audience:
Apprentices
Note:
Year
Organization / institution:
The Society of Clinical Perfusion Scientists of Great Britain and Ireland, The College of Clinical Perfusion Scientists of Great Britain and Ireland
Target audience:
Trainee clinical perfusion scientists
Year:
N/A
Region / City:
Johannesburg
Topic:
Doctoral Thesis Assessment
Document Type:
Guidelines
Institution:
University of Johannesburg
Author:
Faculty of Humanities
Target Audience:
Doctoral Assessors
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Note:
Year
Topic:
Perfusion Science
Document Type:
Examination Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
The Society of Clinical Perfusion Scientists of Great Britain and Ireland, The College of Clinical Perfusion Scientists of Great Britain and Ireland
Target Audience:
Trainee Clinical Perfusion Scientists
Year:
2022
Region / City:
Virginia
Topic:
Course Materials Survey
Document Type:
Survey Report
Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Students
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2025
Region / City:
London
Topic:
Research Degrees, Viva Examination
Document Type:
Report
Organization / Institution:
UCL (University College London)
Author:
UCL Student and Registry Services
Target Audience:
UCL Examination Committee, Viva Chair
Action Period:
2025
Approval Date:
August 2025
Revision Date:
August 2025
Year:
2017
Month:
September
Company:
weinor GmbH & Co. KG
Location:
Cologne, Germany
Product:
Plaza Viva pergola awning
Type:
Press release
Target audience:
Commercial and domestic end users
Features:
Wind-resistant, rainproof, adjustable pitch, OptiStretch option, integrated LED lighting, Valance Plus privacy screen
Technical data:
Max width 6 m, Max projection 5 m, Multi-unit systems optional, Wind protection up to force 6, Roof pitch 4°–25°, Wall/ceiling/roof mounting, Motor drive standard
Media contact:
Christian Pätz, Email: [email protected], Phone: 0221 / 597 09 265, Fax: 0221 / 595 11 89
Institution:
Balaji College of Pharmacy, Anantapuramu
Academic Program:
M.Pharmacy
Event:
Project Viva Voce
Date:
April 2022
Document Type:
Academic project evaluation list
Field of Study:
Pharmacy
Specializations:
Pharmaceutics; Industrial Pharmacy; Pharmaceutical Analysis; Pharmacy Practice
Content:
List of students, hall ticket numbers, guides, specializations, and project titles
Students Included:
B. Amrutha Kala; S. Keerthi; B. Sirisha; K. Chakradhar Balaji; M. Maniteja; P. Jameela; S. Ramya Sri; T. Shameer
Guides:
Dr. P. Rama Krishna Reddy; Dr. V. Sreedhar; Mr. G. Naresh Babu; Mr. G. T. Roopesh; Dr. J. Masthanaiah
Projects Covered:
Drug formulation, gastroretentive floating tablets, sustained release pellets, RP-HPLC analytical method validation, clinical and hospital pharmacy studies
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Edmundston, New Brunswick, Canada
Topic:
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Early Childhood Intervention
Document Type:
Job Posting
Organization:
VIVA Therapeutic Services
Author:
Human Resources, VIVA Therapeutic Services
Target Audience:
Behaviour Consultants and professionals in early childhood intervention
Position Duration:
Temporary
Work Schedule:
Monday to Friday, 8 hours/day, 8:00 am–5:00 pm
Required Qualifications:
Bachelor’s degree in social sciences, health sciences, or education; experience with preschool-aged children with autism spectrum disorder
Language Requirements:
English (French is an asset)
Additional Requirements:
Criminal record check, vulnerable sector check, Social Development prior contact check, valid driver’s license, access to a vehicle
Year:
2026
Region / Institution:
University of Edinburgh
Subject:
Academic research, PhD viva preparation
Document type:
Guide
Author:
University academic staff
Intended audience:
PhD students
Preparation period:
3 weeks to 2 months before viva
Examiners:
Internal and external examiners
Sections:
Introduction, Viva definition, Preparation steps, Viva procedure, Outcomes, Resources
Format:
Digital guide with hyperlinks to official policies
Source type:
Educational and institutional guidance
Institution:
Indian Institute of Technology Patna
Department:
Department of __________________________
Document Type:
Note-Sheet
Subject:
Constitution of Ph.D. Viva Voce Board and approval of travel, TA/DA, local hospitality and honorarium for the External Examiner
City:
Patna
Country:
India
Related Academic Activity:
Ph.D. Viva Voce Examination
Student Status:
Research Scholar
External Examiner:
Professor invited to conduct the Viva Voce examination
Proposed Board Composition:
Chairperson of the DC, Supervisor, one thesis examiner within the country, one faculty member of the department, other DC members as invitees
Travel Provision:
Air India flight up to Economy class
Allowances:
TA/DA, local hospitality, and honorarium for External Examiner as per Institute rules
Approving Authorities:
Thesis Supervisor; Head of Department; Associate Dean (Academic); Director, IIT Patna
Related Reference:
Invitation letter issued by the Academic Section of the Institute
Date:
__________________
Note:
Year
Document Type:
KB Article
Year:
2025
Region / City:
New York City
Theme:
City Planning
Document Type:
Public Notice
Organ / Institution:
City Planning Commission
Author:
City Planning Commission
Target Audience:
Public, Stakeholders
Period of Action:
October 8, 2025
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Software Licensing Agreement
Document Type:
Legal Agreement
Organization / Institution:
Schrödinger, L.L.C.
Author:
Schrödinger, L.L.C.
Target Audience:
Licensee, Users
Effective Period:
3 years
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
License Type:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
YYYY
Region / city:
N/A
Subject:
Pregnancy care, mental health support
Document type:
Medical report
Organization / institution:
Pregnancy Support Program
Author:
Shelley Northridge, CNM
Target audience:
Healthcare professionals
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Tax Law, IRS Regulations
Document Type:
Public Comment
Organization / Institution:
Internal Revenue Service
Author:
Enrolled Agent
Target Audience:
Tax professionals, IRS staff
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A