№ lp_1_06160
File format: docx
Character count: 16547
File size: 474 KB
Year:
2025
Region / City:
New York City
Theme:
City Planning
Document Type:
Public Notice
Organ / Institution:
City Planning Commission
Author:
City Planning Commission
Target Audience:
Public, Stakeholders
Period of Action:
October 8, 2025
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Amendments:
N/A
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Supplementary material for radiomic analysis of MRI sequences using various machine learning methods
Year:
2023
Region / city:
Not specified
Theme:
Radiomics, MRI sequences, machine learning
Document type:
Research Supplement
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Researchers, medical professionals
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2023-24
Region / City:
Banjara Hills, Hyderabad
Topic:
Tender Notice
Document Type:
Official Circular
Organization:
Southern Power Distribution Company of T.S. Ltd.
Author:
Superintending Engineer, Operation Banjara Hills
Target Audience:
Contractors registered with TSSPDCL or similar entities
Period of Validity:
Until 21/09/2023
Approval Date:
06/09/2023
Amendment Date:
None
Context:
Official tender notice from TSSPDCL inviting sealed bids for multiple works under the Banjara Hills Circle, including construction, replacement, and supply contracts.
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Subject:
Employment Contract
Document Type:
Contract
Duration:
2 years
Contextual Description:
A contract for employment outlining the terms, conditions, and benefits of a work agreement between an employer and an employee in the UAE.
Note:
Year
Subject:
Hot water load control systems
Document type:
Project proposal
Organization / institution:
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd
Date of amendments:
March 2024
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Nandi Central, Nandi South, Nandi East, Tindiret, Makueni, Mbooni East, Mbooni West, Kilungu, and other districts in Kenya
Topic:
Functional Skills in English
Document Type:
Examination Questions
Institution:
Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (K.C.S.E.)
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
KCSE candidates, secondary school students
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Modifications:
N/A
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Bangalore
Subject:
Tender Notification
Document Type:
Tender Notice
Organization:
Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP)
Author:
Executive Engineer, Mahalakshmipuram Division
Target Audience:
Registered Contractors of Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike or equivalent registrations
Period of Validity:
180 days from the date of opening of the tender
Approval Date:
25/03/2019
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2019
Region / City:
Manila, Philippines
Subject:
Employment Contract
Document Type:
Contract
Organization / Institution:
Hayya International Services Corp.
Author:
Hayya International Services Corp.
Target Audience:
Employees working abroad
Contract Duration:
Two years
Date of Approval:
2019
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Lafayette, Martinez, Walnut Creek, Concord, Pleasant Hill, Oakland, Antioch
Topic:
Directions to various schools and locations
Document Type:
Directions
Institution:
Multiple schools and locations
Audience:
Public
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Contextual Description:
A collection of driving directions to multiple schools and locations across California.
Year:
2024
Region / City:
King Sabata Dalindyebo Municipality
Theme:
Tender Notice
Document Type:
Bid Notice
Organ / Institution:
King Sabata Dalindyebo Local Municipality
Author:
N. Pakade (Municipal Manager)
Target Audience:
Accredited service providers
Period of Validity:
From 03rd September 2024 to 03rd October 2024
Approval Date:
03rd September 2024
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Kansas City, Wichita
Topic:
Medical Awards
Document Type:
List
Institution:
Various Medical Departments
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Medical professionals, students, faculty
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Malawi
Topic:
Education Reform, Infrastructure Development
Document Type:
Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP)
Agency/Organization:
Ministry of Education, Government of Malawi
Author:
Secretary for Education, Ministry of Education
Target Audience:
Government officials, project implementers, and local communities
Duration:
December 2021 - December 2025
Approval Date:
February 2024
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2021
Month:
November
Region / State:
West Virginia
Country:
United States
Topic:
Student homelessness
Type of document:
Informational report
Legal framework:
McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act; West Virginia Code §18-8A-1
Compiling body:
West Virginia Department of Education
Related agencies:
West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources
Intended use:
Reference for ARP-HCY Grant Application
Target population:
Homeless children and youth, including unaccompanied youth
Education level:
K–12
Funding context:
American Rescue Plan – Homeless Children and Youth (ARP-HCY)
Year:
2026
Region / City:
New York City
Topic:
Contract Extensions
Document Type:
Official Notice
Institution / Organization:
Department of Education, New York City
Author:
N/A
Target Audience:
Vendors, Contractors, Relevant Organizations
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
New York City
Topic:
Contract Extensions, Vendor Agreements
Document Type:
Recommendation Notice
Organization / Institution:
Department of Education, New York City
Author:
Department of Education, New York City
Target Audience:
Vendors, Contractors, Department of Education Staff
Period of Action:
Until contract extension completion
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Makhuduthamaga Local Municipality
Theme:
Water and Sanitation Infrastructure
Document Type:
Bid Notice
Organization:
Makhuduthamaga Local Municipality
Author:
Makhuduthamaga Local Municipality
Target Audience:
Bidders for municipal infrastructure projects
Period of Action:
03/09/2025 - 03/10/2025
Approval Date:
N/A
Amendment Date:
N/A
Note:
Year
Document Type:
KB Article
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Subject:
Software Licensing Agreement
Document Type:
Legal Agreement
Organization / Institution:
Schrödinger, L.L.C.
Author:
Schrödinger, L.L.C.
Target Audience:
Licensee, Users
Effective Period:
3 years
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
License Type:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
YYYY
Region / city:
N/A
Subject:
Pregnancy care, mental health support
Document type:
Medical report
Organization / institution:
Pregnancy Support Program
Author:
Shelley Northridge, CNM
Target audience:
Healthcare professionals
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of changes:
N/A