№ lp_2_3_08857
File format: docx
Character count: 21481
File size: 46 KB
This document is a guide for potential speakers of the ORPA Annual Conference, providing details on how to submit session proposals, deadlines, and session topics.
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Oregon
Theme:
Stronger Together; Navigating into Tomorrow
Document Type:
Guide
Organization:
ORPA
Author:
ORPA Staff
Target Audience:
Potential conference speakers
Period of Validity:
October 18-22, 2021
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2022
Event:
3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #118
Location:
Online
Topic:
Coarse UE location information format and reporting mechanism
Document type:
Meeting report / technical discussion
Organization:
3GPP
Author:
Thales
Agenda item:
6.10.1.1
Deadline for feedback:
2022-05-19 08:00 UTC
Deadline for rapporteur summary:
2022-05-19 10:00 UTC
Proposals for agreement by session chair:
2022-05-19 20:00 UTC
Year:
2020
Region / city:
Johns Hopkins University
Topic:
Coronavirus, Medical Research, Virus Characteristics
Document type:
Informational Article
Organization / institution:
Johns Hopkins University
Author:
Irene Ken
Target audience:
General Public, Researchers
Period of validity:
Ongoing
Date of approval:
4/3/2020
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Eastern
Theme:
Conference, Faculty Information
Document Type:
Conference Guide
Organization / Institution:
Write His Answer Ministries
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Faculty
Effective Date:
July 25, 2025
Date of Approval:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Context:
A guide for faculty members attending the Write His Answer 2025 conference, including details on sign-in procedures, tech checks, conference schedule, and waiver agreement.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Hosted Voice Services
Document Type:
User guide
Organization / Institution:
Clearspan
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
New Administrators and Users of Hosted Voice Services
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
N/A
Region / city:
N/A
Topic:
Power system, wind energy, inverter systems
Document type:
Technical specification
Organization:
N/A
Author:
N/A
Target audience:
Engineers, power system designers
Effective period:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Software Requirements Specification
Document Type:
Guide
Organization:
SoftwareTestingHelp
Author:
SoftwareTestingHelp
Target Audience:
ESS-User, Non-specialists
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Contextual description:
A manual outlining the usage of Adobe Photoshop, including various editing tools, file handling, and image manipulation techniques.
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Verona
Subject:
Housing Application
Document Type:
Application Form
Institution:
ESU di Verona
Author:
ESU di Verona
Target Audience:
Students
Effective Period:
2023
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Towson, MD
Topic:
Healthcare, Endocrinology
Document Type:
Contact Information
Organization:
Bay West Endocrinology Associates
Target Audience:
Patients, Visitors
Note:
Year
Year:
2018
Region / City:
Denton, Texas
Topic:
Information Retrieval
Document Type:
Syllabus
Institution:
University of North Texas
Author:
Brian C. O’Connor, Ph.D.
Target Audience:
Students enrolled in INFO 5206
Period of Validity:
Summer 2018
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Pittsford, NY
Topic:
Baseball, Youth Sports
Document Type:
Event Information
Organization:
MCBR (Monroe County Baseball Region)
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Coaches, Players, Parents
Period of Action:
September 12 to October 31, 2020
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Title:
Advice on Self-Managed Superannuation Funds: Disclosure of Risks
Document number:
INFO 205
Jurisdiction:
Australia
Issuing body:
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Abbreviation of issuing body:
ASIC
Legislation referenced:
Corporations Act 2001
Target audience:
Australian financial services licensees and their representatives
Subject:
Disclosure obligations and risk considerations in providing personal advice on self-managed superannuation funds
Related documents:
Information Sheet 182 Super Switching Advice: Complying with Your Obligations (INFO 182); Information Sheet 206 Advice on Self-Managed Superannuation Funds: Disclosure of Costs (INFO 206)
Type of document:
Regulatory information sheet
Regulatory scope:
Parts 7.7 and 7.7A of the Corporations Act 2001
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Global
Subject:
Telecommunications
Document Type:
Change Request
Organ / Institution:
3GPP TSG-CT WG4
Author:
ZTE, Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell, Samsung
Target Audience:
Telecommunications professionals and engineers
Period of Validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
2020-10-26
Date of Modifications:
N/A
Category:
F (correction)
Release:
Rel-16
Work Item Code:
eNS
Summary of Change:
Define a new service operation – RelocateUeContext for the initial AMF to request the target AMF to relocate a UE context, during an EPS to 5GS handover procedure with AMF re-allocation.
Consequences if not approved:
The N2 SM Info sent by SMF to initial AMF cannot be forwarded to the target AMF thus finally not able to reach NG-RAN, during EPS to 5GS handover procedure with AMF re-allocation.
Clauses Affected:
5.2.2.1, 5.2.2.2.3.1, 5.2.2.2.x(new), 6.1.3.1, 6.1.3.2.4.1, 6.1.3.2.x(new), 6.1.6.1, 6.1.6.2.41, 6.1.6.2.x1(new), 6.1.6.2.x2(new), 6.1.8, A.2
Context Description:
The document defines a change request to add a new service operation for transferring N2 SM information from the source SMF to the target AMF in the EPS to 5GS handover procedure.
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Rochester, MN
Topic:
Cybersecurity of medical and research devices
Document type:
Vendor packet
Organization / Institution:
Mayo Clinic
Author:
Mayo Clinic
Target audience:
Vendors, healthcare technology management teams
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
N/A
Date of amendments:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States, Williamsburg, Virginia
Topic:
Education, Civic Engagement, History, Teacher Fellowship
Document Type:
Fellowship Application Packet
Organization / Institution:
U.S. Department of Education, William & Mary’s Office of Strategic Cultural Partnerships
Author:
We the Teachers Program
Target Audience:
Educators, Teachers
Period of Action:
July 27-30, 2026
Approval Date:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
FY2021
Region:
Alaska, United States
Subject:
Education, Federal Relief Programs, COVID-19 Response
Document Type:
Assurances and Certification Packet
Issuing Authority:
Alaska Department of Education and Early Development
Applicable Programs:
Governors’ Emergency Education Relief Fund (GEERF), Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSERF)
Date Revised:
June 2020
Submission Method:
Grants Management System (GMS)
Legal References:
CARES Act Sections 18002, 18003(d)(1), 18006; GEPA Sections 427, 442; 34 CFR parts 75, 76, 77, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, 99; 2 CFR parts 180, 200, 3474, 3485
Authorized Signatory:
Local Education Agency Superintendent or Authorized Representative
Requirements:
Compliance with federal and state laws, reporting obligations, equitable services to non-public schools, record-keeping and inspection rights
Binding Agreement:
LEA, Alaska Department of Education and Early Development, U.S. Department of Education
Formal Assurances:
Legal authority, access to records, nondiscrimination, labor standards, Single Audit Act, and other federal requirements
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Alaska
Subject:
Education, Federal Grants, COVID-19 Relief
Document Type:
Federal Grant Application
Agency:
Alaska Department of Education and Early Development
Author:
Alaska Department of Education and Early Development
Target Audience:
Local Education Agencies (LEAs)
Effective Period:
FY2025
Approval Date:
July 2024
Revision Date:
July 2024
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Colorado Springs, CO
Topic:
Phlebotomy Technician Certification
Document Type:
Application Packet
Institution:
Pikes Peak State College
Author:
Program Coordinator, Melissa Serna
Target Audience:
Prospective students for the Phlebotomy Technician Certificate Program
Effective Period:
Fall 2026
Approval Date:
April 1, 2026
Modification Date:
N/A