№ files_lp_4_process_3_096193
File format: docx
Character count: 10287
File size: 3194 KB
This document is a teacher resource that provides core texts for the "Knowing the rules to break the rules" program for Year 8 English, aligning with the NSW English K–10 Syllabus.
Year:
2022
Region / City:
New South Wales, Australia
Topic:
English education program
Document type:
Core Text Resource
Institution:
NSW Department of Education
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
Teachers of Year 8 English
Period of validity:
Term 1, Year 8
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of last update:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Context:
A lesson plan for KG2 students focusing on learning about political, traditional, and religious leaders in the community, with activities to enhance their understanding of leadership roles and basic concepts of measurement.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Laguna Hills, CA
Theme:
Christian Faith, Salvation, Biblical Teaching
Document Type:
Sermon
Organization / Institution:
Compass Bible Church
Author:
Dr. Mike Fabarez
Target Audience:
Christian community, Bible study groups
Period of validity:
December 2025
Date of approval:
December 20, 2025
Date of changes:
N/A
Year:
2018
Region / city:
Norway, UK, Scotland
Topic:
Power, politics, emotions in organizational learning
Document type:
Symposium call for papers
Organization:
BI Norwegian Business School, University of St. Andrews, Warwick Business School, University of Bath
Author:
Cathrine Filstad, Bjørn Erik Mørk, Kevin Orr, Russ Vince
Target audience:
Scholars and practitioners in organizational learning, management, and social sciences
Period of validity:
2018
Approval date:
N/A
Date of modifications:
N/A
Contextual description:
A symposium call for papers focusing on the intersection of power, politics, and emotions in organizational learning.
Author:
Gary T. Meadors, Th.D.
Academic Title:
Emeritus Professor of Greek and New Testament
Affiliation:
Grand Rapids Theological Seminary
Year:
2024
Subject:
Biblical theology and discernment of God’s will
Type of Document:
Lecture course outline and introductory material
Structure:
Sixteen lectures divided into four parts and an appendix
Primary Source Base:
The Bible (Old and New Testament)
Related Publication:
Decision Making God’s Way: A New Model for Knowing God’s Will (2003 edition)
Comparative Models Discussed:
Blackaby; Smith; Friesen
Teaching Format:
Video lectures with slides and notes
Intended Audience:
Christians and students of biblical theology
Theological Focus:
Scriptural foundations, worldview and values model, subjective factors in discernment, decision-making process
Publisher of Related Book:
Baker (2003 edition)
Course Website:
www.biblicalelearning.org
Grade Level:
8
Note:
Year
Document Type:
Lesson Plan
Target Audience:
Students (Grade 8)
Date:
June 16th and 17th
Time:
9:00-4:30
Location:
Juvenile Justice Center, Minneapolis, MN
Target Audience:
GALs, child welfare professionals
Description:
Two-day in-person session focusing on the development of racial and ethnic identity for youth in care, emphasizing awareness and skills for supporting youth in the child welfare system.
Year:
2017
Author:
Dr. Gina Wong
Adapted Sources:
Guba and Lincoln (1994, 2005), Morgan (2007), Mertens (2015)
Type of Document:
Academic summary / Review
Region:
International
Subject Area:
Research methodology and philosophy
Intended Audience:
Researchers, evaluators, students in social sciences
Document Scope:
Positivist, postpositivist, constructivist/interpretive, critical/emancipatory/transformative, Indigenous, pragmatic paradigms
Methodological Focus:
Qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, decolonizing practices, holistic approaches
Philosophical Emphasis:
Ontology, epistemology, methodology, axiology
Year:
1904
Region / City:
Eliot, Maine
Document Type:
Religious speech
Author:
Mirza Abul Fazl
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval Date:
N/A
Modification Date:
N/A
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Unknown
Theme:
Workplace Privacy, Employee Rights
Document Type:
Grievance and Request for Information
Organization:
United States Postal Service (USPS)
Author:
Unknown
Target Audience:
USPS Employees, Management, Union Representatives
Effective Period:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Unknown
Date of Amendments:
Unknown
Year:
2018
Region / City:
International, primarily Australia
Subject:
Higher Education, Assessment, Learning
Document Type:
Book Review
Publisher / Institution:
Routledge
Editors:
D. Boud, R. Ajjawi, P. Dawson, J. Tai
Reviewer:
Stephen Merry
Target Audience:
Academics, Educational Researchers, Higher Education Professionals
Sections:
Conceptualising Evaluative Judgement; Theoretical Perspectives; Developing Evaluative Judgement; Evaluative Judgement in Practice
Chapters:
19
Authors:
36 academics
Key Topics:
Peer and self-assessment, digital technology in learning, professional judgement, reflective practice, curriculum-wide development
Grade:
Kindergarten
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Mathematics, Counting, Early Childhood Education
Document Type:
Lesson Plan
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Kindergarten students
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Breed:
Sprocker Spaniel
Type of document:
Guide / Informational Article
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Dog owners, especially Sprocker Spaniel owners
Topics:
Dog behaviour, attachment, training, confidence building
Key concepts:
Attachment, independence, behavioural cues, rescue dogs
Publication format:
Online / Web article
Source:
Canine behaviour guidance
Year:
1898
Date of publication:
May 12, 1898
Source:
The Present Truth, Volume 14, Issues 19, pp. 274–294
Author:
A. T. Jones
Type of document:
Religious article
Theme:
Christian theology, Sabbath observance, knowledge of God
Audience:
Christians, religious readers
Key concepts:
Knowledge of God through Christ, sanctification of the Sabbath, death to sin, grace of God
Period covered:
1898
Year:
Forthcoming
Publication:
The Philosophical Review
Author:
Matthew McGrath
Topic:
Epistemology, Perception
Document type:
Academic article
Target audience:
Philosophers, researchers in epistemology
Main concepts:
Immediate knowledge, mediate knowledge, perception, phenomenology
Note:
Year
Theme:
Religious Education
Document Type:
Script
Target Audience:
Children, Educators
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
North Karanpura
Theme:
Price breakdown for construction and engineering services
Document Type:
Contract / Tender
Organization:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Contractors and service providers in the construction and engineering field
Validity Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2007
Region / city:
England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales
Subject:
Adoption, Fostering, Health Assessment
Document type:
Health Report
Organization:
Agency responsible for adoption and fostering
Author:
Unknown
Target audience:
Prospective adoptive parents, foster carers, GP
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / city:
Manchester
Topic:
Property law, Lease disputes
Document type:
Judgment
Court / institution:
High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts in Manchester
Author:
Judge Hodge QC
Target audience:
Legal professionals, Property lawyers, Academics
Period of validity:
2021
Approval date:
1 April 2021
Date of changes:
None