№ files_lp_3_process_9_11340
File format: docx
Character count: 2563
File size: 57 KB
This report outlines the activities, partnerships, and outcomes of the Indy Summer Youth Programs during the summer of 2020, including adaptations made due to COVID-19 and lessons learned for future programs.
Year:
2020
Region / City:
Indianapolis, IN
Theme:
Youth Programs, Education
Document Type:
Grant Report
Organization:
Indy Summer Youth Programs, The Indianapolis Foundation
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Youth program administrators, grant recipients
Period of Validity:
Summer 2020
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
Note:
Year
Region / City:
Indianapolis, IN
Topic:
Utility & Rent Assistance, Food/Clothing Assistance, Housing Assistance/Shelters, Additional Assistance
Document Type:
Referral List
Organization / Institution:
Various Nonprofits and Government Agencies
Target Audience:
Residents of Indianapolis in need of assistance
Year:
2026
Region / city:
Durham
Service:
Adult and Health Services
Team:
NQSW Team
Document type:
Portfolio / Assessment Tool
Author:
NQSW
Assessor:
ASYE Assessor
Line manager:
Line Manager (if different from ASYE Assessor)
Employing organisation:
Durham County Council
Period covered:
First three months of ASYE
Standards referenced:
Post Qualifying Standards (PQS), Knowledge and Skills Statement (KSS)
Sections included:
Foundational Review, Supervision Log, Training Log, Protected Development Time Log, Self-Assessment Tool, Professional Development Plan, Direct Observation, Feedback Records, Verification of Professional Documentation
Year:
2025
Region / City:
East London
Theme:
Social Work, Employment Training, Mental Health
Document Type:
Policy
Organization / Institution:
East London NHS Foundation Trust
Author:
Katie Lander
Target Audience:
Social Workers, Service Managers, ASYE Assessors, Newly Qualified Social Workers
Effective Period:
January 2026
Approval Date:
24/01/2025
Review Date:
January 2027
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Washington State
Theme:
Supported Employment, Medicaid Transformation
Document Type:
Policy Chapter
Organization / Institution:
Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS)
Author:
Michael Corcoran, Jim Bischoff, Sammy Bernardy, Ruby Pham, Muriel McAuliff, Laura DeVol, Katie Stettler
Target Audience:
Employment Specialists, Service Providers, Individuals with Disabilities
Period of Application:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Denbighshire
Theme:
Housing Support
Document Type:
Referral Form
Organization / Institution:
Denbighshire County Council
Author:
Denbighshire County Council
Target Audience:
Social Services, Health, Local Authority Homeless Team, Police, Probation, YOT, Housing Associations, Hostels, and other related services
Effective Period:
From April 1st, 2024
Approval Date:
January 2024
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2021
Region / City:
United States
Topic:
Research Guidelines and Requirements
Document Type:
Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
National Institute of Justice, Bureau of Prisons
Author:
National Institute of Justice
Target Audience:
Researchers in the field of criminal justice and corrections
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Approval Date:
2021
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Social work, professional development
Document type:
Template, assessment tool
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Newly qualified social workers (NQSW)
Period of validity:
ASYE year
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Note:
Year
Topic:
Social Work, ASYE Program
Document type:
Support and Assessment Agreement
Organization / institution:
Social Work England
Author:
ASYE Assessor
Target audience:
Newly qualified social workers (NQSWs)
Period of validity:
Duration of the ASYE program
Year:
2017
Note:
Region / City
Topic:
Supported Living, Disability Services
Document Type:
Best Practice Checklist
Target Audience:
Support coordinators, supported living coaches, personal support providers
Note:
Year
Subject:
Social Work, Assessment
Document type:
Template
Organization / Institution:
Social Work England
Target audience:
Newly qualified social workers (NQSWs), Assessors, Supervisors
Year:
2023
Region / city:
UK
Subject:
Mental health, online interventions
Document type:
Participant Information Sheet
Organization / institution:
Lancaster University, University College London (UCL), The University of Liverpool, NHS Trusts
Author:
Lancaster University, UCL, University of Liverpool
Target audience:
NHS staff
Period of validity:
Duration of the research project (3 years)
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of amendments:
Not specified
Research ethics committee approval:
NHS Research Ethics Committee
Funding:
National Institute of Health Research (NHIR)
Context:
This is a participant information sheet for the IMPART study, aiming to investigate the implementation of an online toolkit for supporting relatives of people with mental health conditions within the NHS.
Year:
2011
Region / city:
Rural and Frontier Areas
Theme:
Employment, Rural Areas, Supported Employment
Document Type:
Report
Agency / institution:
IPS Trainers
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Employment specialists, mental health professionals
Period of validity:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Date of changes:
Not specified
Grade:
Scale 5
Year:
2025
Region / city:
South Derbyshire District
Theme:
Housing, Homelessness Prevention, Public Sector Services
Document Type:
Job Description
Department / Institution:
South Derbyshire District Council, Housing Services
Author:
Housing Solutions Supervisor
Target Audience:
Local government staff, housing service professionals, private landlords, tenants
Effective Date:
May 2025
Date of Approval:
May 2025
Date of Changes:
N/A
Year:
2015
Region / City:
Durham
Theme:
Social Work, Professional Development
Document Type:
Portfolio
Author:
Durham County Council
Target Audience:
Newly Qualified Social Workers (NQSWs)
Period of Validity:
ASYE Program Duration
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Bolton
Theme:
Education, Internship
Document Type:
Application Form
Organization / Institution:
Bolton Council
Author:
Bolton Council
Target Audience:
Individuals aged 16+ with an Education, Health, and Care Plan
Effective Period:
September 2026 - June 2027
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified
Year:
2024
Region / City:
Seattle
Topic:
Service dogs, ableism, disability justice
Document Type:
Research Article
Organization / Institution:
Seattle Pacific University, Department of Physics
Author:
Amy D. Robertson
Target Audience:
Researchers, disability advocates, public policy experts
Period of Action:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2023
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Investment Reporting and Project Progress
Document Type:
Report
Organization:
Gates Foundation
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Grantees, Program Officers
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Amendments:
Not specified
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2026
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Transitional Housing, Domestic Violence Support
Document Type:
Application Guide
Organization:
Office on Violence Against Women (OVW)
Author:
OVW
Target Audience:
Applicants for OVW Transitional Housing Assistance Grant Program
Period of Effect:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Amendment Date:
Not specified