№ lp_1_22410
File format: docx
Character count: 3552
File size: 51 KB
This document provides guidelines for teaching Auslan (Australian Sign Language) through the use of specific handshapes, orientations, locations, movements, and facial expressions, focusing on students from Foundation to Year 10.
Year:
2025
Region / City:
Australia
Topic:
Auslan Education
Document Type:
Curriculum Guide
Organization:
Australian Curriculum
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Educators and Students learning Auslan
Validity Period:
2025
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Price: 8 / 10 USD
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
The file will be delivered to the email address provided at checkout within 12 hours.
Don’t have cryptocurrency yet?
You can still complete your purchase in a few minutes:- Buy Crypto in a trusted app (Coinbase, Kraken, Cash App or any similar service).
- In the app, tap Send.
- Select network, paste our wallet address.
- Send the exact amount shown above.
The final amount may vary slightly depending on the payment method.
The file will be sent to the email address provided at checkout within 24 hours.
The product description is provided for reference. Actual content and formatting may differ slightly.
) and join the S1NET. For guides with in depth examinations of performance measure definitions, go to:
https://www.milsuite.mil/book/docs/DOC-129783
Table of Contents (Hyperlinks to Sections):
Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ OER Narratives: Notes, Rules, and Instructions OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: Negative Comment Rules Referred OERs Narrative Comment Examples Block a. APFT and HT/WT Block b. Overall Performance Block c. Character (to include SHARP comments) Block d. Presence Block e. Intellect Block f. Leads Block g. Develops Block h. Achieves Senior Rater Potential Senior Rater Narrative Examples Senior Rater Narrative Comment Examples (for potential, promotion, school, etc.) Successive Assignments Other SR Comments (explanations of anything unusual about OER) Effective Words for Evaluations JUNIOR OFFICER PLATE (DA FORM 67-10-1) NOTE: 2LTs who have NOT completed BOLC, will not receive an OER until they complete BOLC (AC and ARNG; USAR officers can receive an OER before completing BOLC). The FROM date will be their commissioning date. All time until their BOLC graduation will be NONRATED on their first OER. OER PROFILING: OERs: Rater and Senior Rater Profiles are CONSTRAINED, meaning Officers are only allowed to grant 49% of each rank they rate with either an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). HOWEVER, if you have an immature profile, and have only just begun rating/senior rating Officers of a certain rank, you are allowed a ONE TIME option of giving one of the first two evaluations you make at a particular grade, an “EXCELS” (as Rater) or “MOST QUALIFIED” (as Senior Rater). OER (OER SUPPORT FORM) PART III: Developing ‘Significant Duties and Responsibilities’ (blocks a., b., and c.): Refer to DA PAM 611-21 (https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/smartbookdapam611-21
) and DA PAM 600-3 (Commissioned Officer Professional Development and Career Management), to assist in the development of PART III, block d. As a minimum, the duty description will include pr:
- Number of personnel supervised, - Amount of resources under the rated officer’s control, - Scope of responsibilities. 3) Descriptions must be clear and concise with emphasis on specific functions required. 4) Note conditions unique to the assignment; e.g. RA officers assigned to FT support duties with RC units or USAR officers assigned to RA units OER NARRATIVES: Notes, Rules, and Instructions Rater and Senior Rater Narratives: - Requires candor and courage; frank and accurate assessment. - Quantify officer’s value relative to peers and do so in concert with rater/senior rater box check. - Are short; tell a simple story about the quality of officer being evaluated. - Are interesting and compelling. - Are looked at by selection board members when they are looking for in-depth information about a rated officer’s performance and potential. - Numbers; 1-10, write them out (e.g. one, two, ten). 11 or higher, write the number; e.g. 11, 15, 105. Exception, when a 1-10 is WITH an 11 or higher; e.g. “5 tool kits with 20 tools each.” - Fashion the narrative to the officer; double check use of “he/his” vs. “she/hers.” - Awards: Awards and/or special recognition received during the rating period may be cited in evaluation comments (for example, “received the Humanitarian Service Medal” or “named the Instructor of the Year”). - Raters and SR CAN use the officer’s name in the narrative; e.g. “1LT Joe was ….” Rater and Rater Narratives: - Focus on PERFORMANCE; explaining what the rated officer did and how well he/she did it. - Focus on specifics to quantify and qualify performance. - Raters should advocate the rated officer to the SR. - When there is no SR (due to lack of qualifications), rater’s narrative provides the input on both performance and potential. Senior Rater (SR) and SR Narrative (see SR Rater Narrative section for examples): - Focus on POTENTIAL, 3-5 years out (promotions, command, school, & assignments). - Can amplify box checks by using the narrative to clearly send the appropriate message to selection boards. - CANNOT mention Box Check. - Additional information for when SR is also Rater can be found in DA PAM 623-3, pg. 26, “DA Form 67–10–1, part VI: block c—Senior Rater Narrative.” OER Narrative Prohibited Techniques, Inconsistencies, No-Go’s: - School/Course Comments: Bullets about how a Soldier did in a school or course are ONLY allowed if that school did not produce an AER/DA Form 1059. - Narratives are not a laundry list of superlatives – more is not necessarily better. - Brief, unqualified superlatives or phrases, particularly if they may be considered trite. - Excessive use of technical acronyms, or phrases not commonly recognized. - Techniques aimed at making specific words, phrases, or sentences stand out from the rest of the narrative; e.g. excessive use of capital letters; unnecessary quotation marks; repeated use of exclamation points; wide spacing between selected words, phrases, or sentences to include double spacing within a paragraph or between paragraphs. - Inappropriate references to box checks; e.g “Would be TOP BLOCK if profile allowed” or “absolutely far exceeded the standard”. - Trying to quantify (e.g. “top 2% of my captains”) with a small population. - Stay in your lane/level; avoid comments like “Best 1LT in the Army” unless you’re the Army CoS. - Stating “the best ever”; having 10 in the population, 50 in the profile. - Using overused phrases and clichés that are counterproductive or overused; e.g. stellar, historic, “delivered a dazzling performance,” “hit the ground running,” consummate professional, and unlimited potential. - Using specific selection board-type language. Examples of this include, “definitely a 6+ Soldier”. - Don’t exaggerate; “If I could prove it, CPT X is an LTC disguised as a CPT.” - Be mindful of what IS NOT said; it can have the same impact as what is said; e.g. NOT having numbers, or quantifiable points. - Don’t say the sa
Note:
en
Topic:
Officer Evaluation, Narrative Guidelines
Document Type:
Guide
Target Audience:
Raters, Senior Raters
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Pennsylvania
Topic:
Academic Integrity, Disability Access, Counseling Services, Non-Discrimination, Mandated Reporting
Document Type:
Syllabus Template
Organization / Institution:
The Pennsylvania State University
Author:
Penn State University
Target Audience:
Students, Faculty
Period of Validity:
Spring 2026
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Contextual Description:
A template document providing essential information on academic integrity, disability access, counseling services, non-discrimination, and mandated reporting for students and faculty at Penn State University.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Pennsylvania
Topic:
Academic Integrity, Disability Access, Counseling, Non-Discrimination, Mandated Reporting
Document Type:
Syllabus Template
Organization / Institution:
The Pennsylvania State University
Author:
Unspecified
Target Audience:
Students
Effective Period:
Spring 2026
Approval Date:
Not provided
Amendment Date:
Not provided
Year:
2021
Region / city:
New Zealand
Topic:
Education, Teaching Standards
Document type:
Template
Organization / institution:
Te Rito Maioha
Author:
Not specified
Target audience:
Graduate students of Teaching (ECE) and Primary
Effective period:
Not specified
Approval date:
Not specified
Modification date:
Not specified
Year:
2017
Region / City:
N/A
Theme:
Electrochemical analysis, pharmaceutical sciences
Document Type:
Research Paper
Author:
Tanuja S B, Kumara Swamy B E, Vasantakumar Pai K
Target Audience:
Researchers, professionals in electrochemistry and pharmaceuticals
Period of Action:
N/A
Date of Approval:
N/A
Date of Changes:
N/A
Context:
Research paper presenting a study on electrochemical techniques for the determination of paracetamol in presence of folic acid using modified electrodes.
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Not specified
Theme:
Character customization for male Viera bodies
Document Type:
Guide
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Players of a specific game (Final Fantasy XIV)
Date of creation:
Not specified
Date of last modification:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Global
Topic:
Computer Skills
Document Type:
Instructional Guide
Organization / Institution:
Educational Resource
Author:
Unspecified
Target Audience:
Students and computer users
Applicable Period:
Current usage
Date of Issue:
2026-03-16
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Education, STEM, Creative Industries, Career Development
Document Type:
Educational Resource
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Children aged 7 - 11, KS2 pupils, Teachers
Duration:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Revision Date:
Not specified
Year:
2026
Region / City:
Kenya
Document Type:
Terms of Reference (TOR)
Organization:
Echo Network Africa Foundation (ENAF), Democracy Trust Fund (DTF)
Author:
Echo Network Africa Foundation (ENAF), Democracy Trust Fund (DTF)
Target Audience:
Consultants, Gender Experts, Development Organizations
Period of Effect:
2026
Approval Date:
January 2026
Date of Revision:
N/A
Note:
Contextual Description
Year:
2021
Region / City:
Brooklyn, NY
Topic:
Investment Strategy
Document Type:
Financial Advice
Organization:
Maiorano & Associates, Inc.
Author:
Maiorano & Associates, Inc.
Target Audience:
Individual investors
Effective Period:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Year:
2021
Region / City:
United States
Theme:
Mental Health, ADHD, Comorbidity
Document Type:
Research Study
Organization / Institution:
Stony Brook University, Department of Health Sciences
Author:
Constantinos Parpounas
Target Audience:
Parents, Mental Health Professionals, Psychiatrists, Psychologists
Period of Validity:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Date of Changes:
Not specified
Keywords:
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Mental Health, Comorbidities, Diagnosis, Treatment
Year:
2023
Region / City:
South Dublin
Theme:
Mental Health, Health and Wellbeing
Document Type:
Funding Guidelines
Organization / Institution:
South Dublin County Council
Author:
South Dublin County Council
Target Audience:
Organizations working with disadvantaged groups, community organizations, local authorities
Period of Action:
2013-2025
Approval Date:
2023
Amendment Date:
N/A
Year:
Not specified
Region / City:
Not specified
Topic:
Performance under pressure, Focus training
Document Type:
Guide
Organization / Institution:
Not specified
Author:
Not specified
Target Audience:
Athletes, Coaches
Period of Effect:
Not specified
Approval Date:
Not specified
Modification Date:
Not specified
Year:
2023
Region / City:
India
Field:
IT / DevOps / System Administration
Document Type:
Resume / CV
Organization / Institution:
CtrlS, TMI Group
Author:
Kranthi Gnappareddy
Target Audience:
Hiring managers, recruiters, IT professionals
Period of Validity:
Ongoing
Date of Approval:
Not Applicable
Date of Changes:
October 2023
Year:
2026
Region / city:
United Kingdom, Northern Ireland
Subject:
Mental health awareness, suicide prevention in farming
Document type:
Press release
Organization:
Livestock and Meat Commission (LMC)
Author:
Colin Smith, Chief Executive of LMC
Target audience:
Farmers, agricultural community, general public
Campaign period:
9–13 February 2026
Associated organization:
Farm Safety Foundation (Yellow Wellies), Farm Safety Partnership (FSP)
Contact information:
028 9263 3000, [email protected], [email protected]
Context:
Press release detailing LMC’s support for the Mind Your Head campaign, highlighting mental health challenges among UK farmers and providing information on ongoing awareness efforts and resources.
Year:
2013
Region / City:
Washington D.C.
Theme:
Employee training, accountability, workload management
Document Type:
Statement for the record
Organization / Institution:
American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE)
Author:
AFGE National Veterans’ Affairs Council
Target Audience:
Members of the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs, veterans, VBA employees
Period of validity:
N/A
Approval date:
March 20, 2013
Modification date:
N/A
Year:
2019
Location:
Nairobi, Kenya
Field:
Mechanical Engineering
Program:
Internship
Host organization:
Illumina Africa
Participant:
Thulith Edirisinghe
Home country:
Sri Lanka
Role:
Systems Engineer
Project focus:
Solar and battery storage system automation
Mentor/Collaborator:
Pulkit Shamsherry, MIT graduate
Project outcome:
Automation of system design process, increased accuracy and turnaround time
Personal experience:
Cultural immersion and exploration of Kenya, engagement with local community and hosts
Year:
2021
Region:
Southern Africa
Country Office:
Malawi
Type of document:
Evaluation report
Organization:
UNICEF
Person in charge:
Beatrice Targa
Target group:
Vulnerable households, children
Scope:
National Social Support Programme (MNSSP II)
Focus:
Cash-based programming and shock-sensitive social protection
Implementation partners:
Government ministries, donors, WFP, other agencies
Status of recommendations:
Underway, with some actions completed or in preparation
Intended use:
Inform program adjustments, advocacy, and future evaluations
Evaluation context:
Humanitarian situations affecting social protection delivery